Case law

Henry Hodges v. Roland Colson

711 F.3d 589 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 26, 2013

See Richmond v. Polk, 375 F.3d 309 (4th Cir.2004); United States v. … Elzy v.

Earl B. Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

865 F.2d 1267 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 4, 1989

BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee. No. 88-5440. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Jan. 4, 1989. Before MILBURN and ALAN E. … Brown, appeals from a district court order awarding attorney fees under one of the two alternative provisions of the Equal Access to Justice Act under which plaintiff claimed attorney's fees.

Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v. Lilburn Rowe

710 F.2d 251 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 17, 1983

Bumble Bee Seafoods v. Director, OWCP, 629 F.2d 1327 , 1329 (9th Cir.1980). Accord Miller v. Central Dispatch, Inc., 673 F.2d 773, 778-79 (5th Cir.1982); Janusziewicz v. … opinion. 5 Spra-gue v.

Russell Kiser v. Harry Kamdar

831 F.3d 784 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 5, 2016

In the seminal case establishing the right of commercial speech, Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. … V.

C. F. Hornback and Louis P. Tschiffely v. Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen, Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. v. Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen, Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen v. C. F. Hornback and Louis P. Tschiffely, and Louisville& Nashville Railroad Co.

346 F.2d 161 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 27, 1965

Eldred, Louisville, Ky., Brown & Eldred, Louisville, Ky., of counsel, for C. F. Hornback et al. John P. Sandidge, Lousville, Ky., Woodward, Hobson & Fulton, H. G. Breetz, M. D. … Wooten v. Ohler, 303 F.2d 759 (C.A.5); Holzer v.

John Doe v. David Baum

903 F.3d 575 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 7, 2018

Doe v. … The Appeals Board also  No. 17-2213 Doe v. Baum, et al.

Brooks Lee Anderson v. Wilburn C. Johnson, Warden, Tennessee State Penitentiary

371 F.2d 84 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 22, 1966

Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443, 482 , 73 S.Ct. 397, 420 , 97 L.Ed. 469 , rehearing denied [Speller v. Allen], 345 U.S. 946 , 73 S.Ct. 827 , 97 L.Ed. 1370 . … Greenfield Ed Brown Charlie Harrison John W. Joyce A. M.

Imboden v. United States

194 F.2d 508 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 6, 1952

Miller v. United States, 6 Cir., 169 F.2d 865 . In Niznik v. … Niznik v.

United States v. Jack Frederick McKart

395 F.2d 906 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 14, 1968

In Estep v. … [Cf.: Estep v. United States, supra, 327 U.S. 114 , 66 S.Ct. 423 ; Williams v. United States, 203 F.2d 85, 88 (9th Cir. 1953).]” Accord, Moore v. United States, 302 F.2d 929 (9th Cir.); Breen v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Local Union 136, Muskingum Valley District Council of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America

404 F.2d 854 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 20, 1968

ORDER This cause is before the Court upon a petition of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order finding that the respondents violated Section 8(b) (1) (A) of the National Labor Relations Act ( 29 U.S.C … Accordingly, It is ordered that the petition for enforcement of said order of the National Labor Relations Board ( 165 NLRB No. 139 ) be and it is hereby denied.

National Labor Relations Board v. Local Union No. 141 Of The Sheet Metal Workers' International Association

425 F.2d 730 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 5, 1970

(BNA) 2193 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, and Cincinnati Sheet Metal Engineering Company, Intervenor, v. … that the Board's rulings of law are correct and that its findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence. 5 Enforcement of the order is granted.

Jahangir Babai and Gitti Fakrainejad v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

985 F.2d 252 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 3, 1993

INS v. Jong Ha Wang, 450 U.S. 139, 145 , 101 S.Ct. 1027, 1031 , 67 L.Ed.2d 123 (1981). Our task in this case is to review the Board’s exercise of its discretion. … The Board acknowledged that “[Relevant factors, though not ‘extreme’ in themselves, must be considered in the aggregate in determining whether ‘extreme hardship’ exists.” Board Decision at 3. See Hernandez-Patino v.

COMMISSIONER OF INT. REVENUE v. Kilpatrick's Estate

140 F.2d 887 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 18, 1944

In this type of case interest is assessable under the statute only after the Board has acted. This view is consistent with the authorities. United States v. … Income Taxation, Vol. 9, § 50.10, footnote 67, and Vol. 10, § 55.02 (page 8); Capital Bldg. & Loan Ass’n v. Com’r, 23 B. T. A. *889 848. See, also, Superheater Co. v. Com’r, 2 Cir., 125 F.2d 514 ; Epstein v.

Scarborough v. Morgan

21 F. App'x 279 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 8, 2001

Brown v. Bargery, 207 F.3d 863, 866-67 (6th Cir.2000). … Miller v. Menghini, 213 F.3d 1244, 1246 (10th Cir.2000); Brown v. Sikes, 212 F.3d 1205, 1207 (11th Cir.2000). Scarborough did not exhaust his administrative remedies for any of his claims.

National Labor Relations Board v. Fred H. Johnson, Trustee Under the Will of Clay M. Thomas, Deceased, D/B/A Atlas Linen and Industrial Supply

310 F.2d 550 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 5, 1962

The Board is not bound by the Examiner’s findings. It may disagree with them. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 . … National Labor Relations Board, supra; National Labor Relations Board v. Walton Manufacturing Company, 369 U.S. 404 , 82 S.Ct. 853 , 7 L.Ed. 2d 809 . Enforcement of the Board’s order is hereby granted.

Rase v. United States

129 F.2d 204 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 29, 1942

S. 8 , 28 S.Ct. 201 , 52 L.Ed. 369 ; Angelus v. Sullivan, supra; Arbitman v. Woodside, 4 Cir., 258 F. 441 ; United States v. … In Jacobson v.

Jackson, Tennessee Hospital Co. v. West Tennessee Healthcare, Inc.

414 F.3d 608 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 11, 2005

A Under the so-called “state action doctrine,” it is well established that antitrust law does not apply to states acting as sovereigns.4 Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341 (1943). … See, e.g., Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 509 U.S. 209, 251 (1993) (“[an element] of the violation is the competitive consequences of predatory conduct.”); Texaco Inc. v.

Nathaniel Griggs v. Robert Brown, Jr.

787 F.2d 590 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 3, 1986

Miller v. Solem, 728 F.2d 1020, 1024 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 105 S. Ct. 145 (1984); Riley v. Jeffes, 777 F.2d 143, 147 (3d Cir. 1985); Davidson v. … Riley v. Johnson, 528 F. Supp. 333, 341 (E.D.

Hassan v. Holder

604 F.3d 915 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 11, 2010

Because the Board in this case issued an independent opinion as to this claim, we review the decision of the Board as the final agency determination. See, e.g., Morgan v. … Abdulahad v. Holder, 581 F.3d 290, 296 (6th Cir. 2009); see also Petrov v.

United States v. Joseph Thomas Mulloy

412 F.2d 421 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 10, 1969

In Smith v. … United States v. Seeger, supra; Dickinson v. United States, 346 U.S. 389 , 74 S.Ct. 152 , 98 L.Ed. 132 (1953); Estep v. United States, 327 U.S. 114 , 66 S.Ct. 423 , 90 L.Ed. 567 (1946); United States v.