Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca6

10,000+ results

0.91s

  • Davis v. Clinton

    74 F. App'x 452 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 4, 2003

    See Brown v. Bargery, 207 F.3d 863, 867 (6th Cir.2000). … See Brown v. Toombs, 139 F.3d 1102, 1103-04 (6th Cir.1998).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Erickson Trucking Serv., Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    929 F.3d 393 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 10, 2019

    The Board’s General Counsel must show that “animus, whether toward the union or an employee’s protected conduct,” caused the discharge. NLRB v. Vemco, Inc., 989 F.2d 1468, 1476 (6th Cir. 1993); see NLRB v. Transp. Mgmt. … Temp-Masters, Inc. v. NLRB, 460 F.3d 684, 693 (6th Cir. 2006). Was the Board’s remedy a permissible one?

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Wendy Browning v. Edmonson Cnty., Ky.

    18 F.4th 516 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 17, 2021

    No. 20-6078 Browning, et al. v. Edmonson Cnty., Ky., et al. … No. 20-6078 Browning, et al. v. Edmonson Cnty., Ky., et al.

    Cited 59 timesPublished
  • Ricky Flamingo Brown v. James Crody John House Roy Knight Sandra Hall Thomas Vance Richard Merchant Roy Hughes Michael Dutton

    21 F.3d 427 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 17, 1994

    Ricky Flamingo BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James CRODY; John House; Roy Knight; Sandra Hall; Thomas Vance; Richard Merchant; Roy Hughes; Michael Dutton, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-5487. … United States v. Vasquez, 985 F.2d 491, 495 (10th Cir.1993); King v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (Uaw) v. National Labor Relations Board

    670 F.2d 663 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 17, 1982

    Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 488 , 71 S.Ct. 456, 464 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951); Andino v. NLRB, 619 F.2d 147, 151 (1st Cir. 1980). … Accordingly, the Board’s order dismissing the complaint is AFFIRMED.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. The Richard W. Kaase Company and Bakery and Confectionery Workers International Union, Local 19

    346 F.2d 24 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 20, 1965

    Compare FTC v. … Enforcement of so much of the Board’s order as directs respondent Kaase to bargain with ABC Local 219 is denied. In all other respects the Board’s order is enforced. 2 . See NLRB v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Detroit Resilient Floor Decorators Local Union No. 2265

    317 F.2d 269 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 22, 1963

    317 F.2d 269 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. DETROIT RESILIENT FLOOR DECORATORS LOCAL UNION NO. 2265 OF the UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, Respondent. No. 15082. … See, National Labor Relations Board v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Udine Ellis, Guardian for Lateasha Pendergrass v. Cleveland Municipal School District

    455 F.3d 690 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 24, 2006

    So she got up and told me to write my name on the board, and I did, and she got mad at me, and she slammed me up against the wall, and the back of my head hit the board, and she then slung me on the ground and jumped on me … Brown v. Shaner, 172 F.3d 927, 931 (6th Cir.1999).

    Cited 339 timesPublished
  • Charles Warkentien and Patricia Ann Warkentien v. James J. Vondracek and Donna L. Vondracek

    633 F.2d 1 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 23, 1980

    , Johnson v. … n. o. v. under Rule 50(b).

    Cited 80 timesPublished
  • Joe D. Pennycuff v. Fentress County Board of Education and Homer Lee Linder, Jr., Superintendent of Fentress County Schools

    404 F.3d 447 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 12, 2005

    Bowden, 29 S.W.3d at 465 (quoting Sanders v. Vinson, 558 S.W.2d 838, 843 (Tenn.1977)). Noting its holding in Reeves v. Etowah City Sch. … V. Pennycuffs final argument is that the Fentress County Board is judicially es-topped from denying him tenure.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • White v. Wyndham Vacation Ownership, Inc.

    617 F.3d 472 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 11, 2010

    v. … Browning, 283 F.3d at 776 .

    Cited 177 timesPublished
  • Community National Bank of Pontiac v. Saxon

    310 F.2d 224 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 26, 1962

    Fahey v. O’Melveny & Myers, 200 F.2d 420, 472, 474, 477 (C.A. 9), certiorari denied, 345 U.S. 952 ; O’Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, 340 U.S. 504, 508 , 71 S.Ct. 470 , 95 L.Ed. 483 ; Securities & Exchange Comm. v. … Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System, 303 F.2d 832 (C.A. 8); Walker v. Altmeyer, 137 F.2d 531 (C.A. 2). See, also, United States v. Shimer, 367 U.S. 374, 381-382 , 81 S.Ct. 1554 , 6 L.Ed.2d 908 ; Noren v.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Gary Love v. Electric Power Board of Chattanooga

    392 F. App'x 405 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 20, 2010

    Electric Power Board in wage or salary, a less distinguished title, a material loss of benefits, significantly diminished material responsibilities.” Momah v. Dominguez, 239 F. … Electric Power Board ADEA’s retaliation provision, 29 U.S.C. § 623(d), requires the plaintiff to show, inter alia, “that he engaged in a protected activity.” Fox v. Eagle Distrib.

    Cited 12 timesUnpublished
  • Barry Howard v. Railroad Retirement Board

    991 F.2d 795 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 1, 1993

    Barry HOWARD, Petitioner, v. RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent. No. 92-3826. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. April 1, 1993. … Board in this case be and it hereby is affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • United States v. Ronald Ted Alsobrook and George Alvin Rolls

    620 F.2d 139 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 22, 1980

    BAILEY BROWN, Circuit Judge. … Alsobrook was subsequently seen boarding a flight leaving Detroit. On December 8, 1977, FBI agents in Los Angeles observed Alsobrook boarding a flight bound for Detroit.

    Cited 43 timesPublished
  • Consolidated Foods Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, and Retail Store Employees Union, Local No. 876, Intervenor

    403 F.2d 662 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 21, 1968

    N.L.R.B. v. Barberton Plastics Products, Inc., 354 F.2d 66 (6th Cir.1965). See also Montgomery Ward & Co. v. N.L.R.B., 377 F.2d 452 (6th Cir.1967). Likewise, there is no evidence to indicate that Mrs. … See N.L.R.B. v. Tennessee Packers, Inc., 390 F.2d 787 (6th Cir.1968). The Board placed great stress on the company’s unrelated anti-union actions and its hostile attitude toward the Fletchers after their discharge.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • General Truck Drivers, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Local No. 957 v. National Labor Relations Board

    934 F.2d 732 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 10, 1991

    That finding is consistent with Board findings in similar cases involving delivery of goods to a construction site. See Drivers Local 695 v. NLRB, 361 F.2d 547 , 552 n. 19 (D.C.Cir.1966). … In doubtful situations, we give weight to the Board's application of the Act, NLRB v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Euclid National Bank v. The Federal Home Loan Bank Board and the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation

    396 F.2d 950 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 14, 1968

    Citing Fleetwood Acres v. Federal Housing Administration, 171 F.2d 440, 442 (2nd Cir. 1948). For the reasons stated in the District Judge’s memorandum opinion, the judgment is affirmed.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Allied Erecting & Dismantling Co. v. Surface Transportation Board

    835 F.3d 548 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 22, 2016

    Nicholson v. ICC, 711 F.2d 364, 367 (D.C. Cir. 1983) (emphasis omitted). Railroad lines fall within the Board’s general jurisdiction over railroad transportation, pursuant to section 10501. … See Port City Prop. v. Union Pacific R. Co., 518 F.3d 1186, 1188 (10th Cir. 2008).

    Cited 3 timesUnpublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Turner Construction Company and International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 917, AFL

    227 F.2d 498 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 10, 1955

    The Board’s sole reliance is the Supreme Court’s decision in Radio Officers’ Union v. N. L. R. B., 1953, 347 U.S. 17 , 74 S.Ct. 323 , 98 L.Ed. 455 . The case is not apposite. … Weight must be given to findings of fact by the trier of facts who has opportunity denied to us and to the Board for determining the credibility of witnesses. Finally, N. L. R. B. v. Pittsburgh S. S.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.