Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca6

10,000+ results

3.27s

  • Heather Fenton v. Hisan, Inc.

    174 F.3d 827 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 23, 1999

    In Blankenship v. … In Moon v.

    Cited 112 timesPublished
  • United States v. Mark Brown

    Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 7, 2018

    The probable cause standard is flexible and based on common sense, Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730, 742 (1983); it requires more than mere suspicion but less than prima facie proof. United States v. … -3- No. 17-6430 United States v. Brown 2002). We also consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the government. United States v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Chicago Beef Company

    944 F.2d 905 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 12, 1991

    NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. CHICAGO BEEF COMPANY, Respondent. No. 91-5123. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Sept. 12, 1991. 1 Before RALPH B. GUY, Jr., Circuit Judge, JOHN W. … the Board's order, as corrected; 3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED by the Court that the said order, as corrected, of the Board be and the same is hereby enforced; and that the Respondent, Chicago Beef Company, Detroit

    Cited 1 timesUnpublished
  • Ziemba v. Consolidation Coal Co.

    56 F. App'x 232 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 3, 2003

    See id.; see also Brown v. Rock Creek Mining Co., 996 F.2d 812, 816 (6th Cir.1993) (employing “hastening” standard). … See, e.g., Cornett v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pennsylvania R. v. Schafer

    290 F. 140 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 5, 1923

    This crew was engaged in moving ten cars attached to an engine, on the scale track of the Brown-Bonnell plant of the Republic Iron & Steel Company. Two of these cars were required to be detached from the train. … The defendant introduced in evidence a rule of the defendant railroad company of which the following is a copy: “Employes must examine and know for themselves that grabirons, brake shafts and attachments, running boards,

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Robert Bright v. Gallia Cnty., Ohio

    753 F.3d 639 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 3, 2014

    Board of Regents of State Colls. v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 (1972). … See Quinn v. Shirey, 293 F.3d 315, 320 (6th Cir. 2002) (citing Brown v. City of Niota, 214 F.3d 722–23 (6th Cir. 2000)). Thus, we AFFIRM the dismissal of this claim. 4.

    Cited 209 timesPublished
  • Jane Doe v. Claiborne County, Tennessee

    103 F.3d 495 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 26, 1996

    the County and/or the School Board is responsible for that violation. 44 See Collins v. … Co. v. Browning, 310 U.S. 362, 369 , 60 S.Ct. 968, 972 , 84 L.Ed. 1254 (1940). It must reflect a course of action deliberately chosen from among various alternatives. City of Oklahoma v.

    Cited 212 timesPublished
  • Kendrix M. Easley v. University of Michigan Board of Regents Terry Sandalow, Individually and as Dean of Law School

    853 F.2d 1351 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 11, 1988

    The court thereafter: (1) dismissed the Board of Regents in their official and individual capacities; (2) declined to exercise its discretion to hear the pendent state claims in Counts V, VI, VII, and VIII and dismissed them … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 576 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2708 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972).

    Cited 74 timesPublished
  • William Lona White, Shirley Jean White v. Kentuckiana Livestock Market, Inc.

    397 F.3d 420 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 9, 2005

    Comm’n v. Metro Transp. Co. … ”); Laracuente v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Half-Century, Inc. D/B/A Holiday Inn of Niles, Michigan

    652 F.2d 612 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 21, 1981

    The Board’s decision and order are reported at 241 N.L. R.B. No. 101. … The Administrative Law Judge and the Board found that respondent had committed an unfair labor practice by refusing to bargain by the time the union filed such charge with the Board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mississippi Extended Care Center, Inc., D/B/A Care Inn, Collierville v. National Labor Relations Board

    496 F.2d 862 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 21, 1974

    The Board has cross-applied for enforcement of its order. 202 N.L.R.B. 139 . Reference is made to the reported decision of the Board for detailed recitation of the pertinent facts. … It is, accordingly, ordered that the cross-application of the Board for enforcement of its order is granted.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. South Point Barge Company, Inc., and South Point Towing Company, Inc.

    470 F.2d 998 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 3, 1973

    The Board’s Decision and Order, issued on March 16, 1972, is reported at 195 NLRB No. 168 . We are satisfied that the Order of the Board is supported by substantial evidence on the record. … Now, therefore, it is ordered that the Order of the Board be, and it is, hereby enforced.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Williams v. Detroit Board of Education

    226 F. App'x 446 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 5, 2007

    Johnson v. Karnes, 398 F.3d 868, 873 (6th Cir. 2005). … Id. at 522; see also Nuyen v. Slater, 127 N.W.2d 369, 373 (Mich. 1964); Swenson-Davis v. Martel, 354 N.W.2d 288, 290-91 (Mich. Ct. App. 1984).

    Cited 1 timesUnpublished
  • Phelps v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'n

    112 F. 453 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 3, 1901

    They are Brown v. Vancleave, 86 Ky. 381 , 6 S. W. 25 , and Meadows v. Goff, 90 Ky. 540 , 14 S. W. 535 . Brown v. … It was not thereby sought to amend the original petition, nor to tack onto the original cause of action a new and distinct suit, as in Brown v. Yancleave, cited above.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Froman v. Peterson

    74 F. App'x 484 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 8, 2008

    P. 34(a) Froman sued prison psychologists, a guard, and members of the Kentucky Parole Board. … See Chambers v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • United States v. Aaron Brown

    86 F.3d 1156 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 24, 1996

    A panel of this court affirmed Brown's conviction and sentence on appeal. United States v. … The record reflects that the evidence on which Brown relies would not likely lead to an acquittal if his case were retried. See United States v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • City of Gladstone v. Throop

    71 F. 341 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 3, 1895

    Shannon v. People, 5 Mich. 71 ; Breitung v. Lindauer. 87 Mich. 217 ; Dewey v. Manufacturing Co., 42 Mich. 399 , 4 N. W. 179 ; Feige v. Railroad Co., 62 Mich. 1 , 28 N. W. 685 ; U. S. v. Claflin, 97 U. … Parkersburg v. Brown, 106 U. S. 487, 503 , 1 Sup. Ct. 442, and cases there cited. It is said the bonds were illegal because in excess of 5 per cent, of the assessed value of the property in the district.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Blankenship v. Blackwell

    Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 16, 2005

    Brown, CAPITAL UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL, Columbus, Ohio, Michael P. Cassidy, CASSIDY & ASSOCIATES, Independence, Ohio, for Appellants. … Blankenship v. Blackwell, 817 N.E.2d 382, 385 (Ohio 2004). Appellants’ mandamus action challenged only the 8,009 signatures that had been invalidated by the local election boards prior to the protest action. Id. at 386.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Michael Charles Ward v. Dennis Dyke Fred Christians Robert J. Mayer Sherry Burt, Dan Bolden Donald Houseworth Robert Brown, Jr. David Haskell, Warden

    58 F.3d 271 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 29, 1995

    See Turner v. … In an Opinion and Order entered on May 25, 1993, the district court granted defendants’ partial motion for summary judgment as to defendants Brown, Bolden, Houseworth, and Haskell.

    Cited 127 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Cas Walker's Cash Stores Inc., and Independent Union of Grocer's Employees

    659 F.2d 79 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 14, 1981

    Conflicts in the evidence are for the Board to resolve and, if supported by substantial evidence, such resolu *81 tions must be accepted by this Court. NLRB v. Pinkerton’s Inc., 621 F.2d 1322, 1324 (6th Cir. 1980). … We find substantial evidence in the record to support the Board’s findings of the unfair labor practices listed above. We also find the Board properly applied the guidelines of NLRB v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.