Case law

Laborers' International Union of North America, Afl-Cio, Local No. 83 v. National Labor Relations Board

497 F.2d 1337 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 6, 1974

This court is of the view that there is substantial evidence on the record to support the Board’s conclusion that the Union violated § 8(b)(1)(A) and (2) of the Act. Universal Camera Corp. v. … The Union, however, did not introduce this agreement into evidence, but rather contends that the Board had the burden of producing it as part of its ease. In N.L.R.B. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Moe Scharfstein & Phil Scharfstein, D/B/A Stein-Way Clothing Company

209 F.2d 261 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 2, 1953

The National Labor Relations Board, having on March 31, 1953 issued an order against Respondents, and having filed its brief and record in the above case, and subsequent thereto having filed its motion for summary entry of … Take the following affirmative action, which the National Labor Relations Board has found will effectuate the policies of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq.

International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Ship Builders, Blacksmiths, Forgers & Helpers Local 105 v. National Labor Relations Board

781 F.2d 569 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 27, 1986

Upon consideration of the briefs and record herein and after oral argument, the judgment of the National Labor Relations Board is AFFIRMED for the reasons stated in the entered opinion of the Board.

Lapeer County, Michigan, a Municipal Corporation v. Montgomery County, Ohio, a Municipal Corporation Montgomery County Sheriff's Department

108 F.3d 74 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 9, 1997

See County of Monroe v. … See EEOC v. Brown & Root, Inc., 688 F.2d 338 (5th Cir.1982) (movant failed to demonstrate adverse effect of failure to join party).

Lawrence v. Welch

531 F.3d 364 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 3, 2008

v. … In Loriz v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Local 742, International Union of Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio

519 F.2d 815 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 16, 1975

ORDER The application for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board, reported at 213 N.L.R.B. # 19 having come on to be heard, and it appearing that substantial evidence on the record as a whole supports … the Board’s finding that the union caused some of the employees to refuse to work overtime for the purpose of compelling the company to accept respondent’s bargaining demands, and that the Board was correct in its determination

Heather Fenton v. Hisan, Inc.

174 F.3d 827 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 23, 1999

In Blankenship v. … In Moon v.

In Re Romulus Community Schools

729 F.2d 431 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 7, 1984

Before KEITH and WELLFORD, Circuit Judges and BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge. … Compare Austwick v. Board of Education, 555 F.Supp. 840, 842 (N.D.Ill.1983) (Thermtron prohibits discretionary remands of pendent state claims after voluntary dismissal of federal claim) with Zahnow v.

Pennsylvania R. v. Schafer

290 F. 140 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 5, 1923

This crew was engaged in moving ten cars attached to an engine, on the scale track of the Brown-Bonnell plant of the Republic Iron & Steel Company. Two of these cars were required to be detached from the train. … The defendant introduced in evidence a rule of the defendant railroad company of which the following is a copy: “Employes must examine and know for themselves that grabirons, brake shafts and attachments, running boards,

National Labor Relations Board v. Edgar Spring, Inc. D/B/A Spring Industries and Tri-State Asphalt Corporation

800 F.2d 595 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 4, 1986

See also NLRB v. Heck’s, Inc., 369 F.2d 370, 371 (6th Cir.1966) (“[Cjompliance with [an] order [of the Board] is no defense against the entry of a decree of enforcement.”). … See NLRB v.

United States v. Mark Brown

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 7, 2018

The probable cause standard is flexible and based on common sense, Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730, 742 (1983); it requires more than mere suspicion but less than prima facie proof. United States v. … -3- No. 17-6430 United States v. Brown 2002). We also consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the government. United States v.

Ziemba v. Consolidation Coal Co.

56 F. App'x 232 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 3, 2003

See id.; see also Brown v. Rock Creek Mining Co., 996 F.2d 812, 816 (6th Cir.1993) (employing “hastening” standard). … See, e.g., Cornett v.

Robert Bright v. Gallia Cnty., Ohio

753 F.3d 639 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 3, 2014

Board of Regents of State Colls. v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 (1972). … See Quinn v. Shirey, 293 F.3d 315, 320 (6th Cir. 2002) (citing Brown v. City of Niota, 214 F.3d 722–23 (6th Cir. 2000)). Thus, we AFFIRM the dismissal of this claim. 4.

George G. Abraham and Herbert Abraham, Trustees of the Abraham Trust v. United States

406 F.2d 1259 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 13, 1969

Except for a conflict of opinion in the decided cases in this circuit, we would affirm on Judge Brown’s well-reasoned opinion. Abraham v. United States, 272 F.Supp. 807 (W.D.Tenn.1967). … See Mor-rissey et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (1935) 296 U.S. 344 , 56 S.Ct. 289 , 80 L.Ed. 263 .” 3 . Cf. A. A. Lewis & Co. v.

Jane Doe v. Claiborne County, Tennessee

103 F.3d 495 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 26, 1996

the County and/or the School Board is responsible for that violation. 44 See Collins v. … Co. v. Browning, 310 U.S. 362, 369 , 60 S.Ct. 968, 972 , 84 L.Ed. 1254 (1940). It must reflect a course of action deliberately chosen from among various alternatives. City of Oklahoma v.

Fox Painting Company and Fox Painting and Decorating, Inc., and v. National Labor Relations Board, and Cross-Applicant

919 F.2d 53 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 16, 1990

International Association of Bridge, Structural and Ornamental Iron Workers v. NLRB, 843 F.2d 770 (3d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Deklewa v. NLRB, 488 U.S. 889 , 109 S.Ct. 222 , 102 L.Ed.2d 213 (1988). … Adair Standish Corp. v. NLRB, 912 F.2d 854, 866 (6th Cir.1990).

Owens (Lee) v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U.S. Department of Labor Benefits Review Board

746 F.2d 1478 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 4, 1984

746 F.2d 1478 Owens (Lee) v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U.S. Department of Labor Benefits Review Board NO. 84-3184 United States Court of Appeals, sixth Circuit. OCT 04, 1984 1 Appeal From: Ben.

Kendrix M. Easley v. University of Michigan Board of Regents Terry Sandalow, Individually and as Dean of Law School

853 F.2d 1351 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 11, 1988

The court thereafter: (1) dismissed the Board of Regents in their official and individual capacities; (2) declined to exercise its discretion to hear the pendent state claims in Counts V, VI, VII, and VIII and dismissed them … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 576 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2708 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972).

William Lona White, Shirley Jean White v. Kentuckiana Livestock Market, Inc.

397 F.3d 420 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 9, 2005

Comm’n v. Metro Transp. Co. … ”); Laracuente v.

National Labor Relations Board v. International Credit Service, a Division of Lucas County Credit Bureau, Inc.

651 F.2d 1172 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 6, 1981

The existence of an agreement is a question of fact, and it is the Board’s *1174 function to determine whether the employer refuses to sign and honor the bargain produced by the negotiations. N.L.R.B. v. … We should enforce the Board’s order if we find substantial evidence supports the finding that an agreement was reached. Adams Potato Chips, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 430 F.2d 90 (6th Cir. 1970).