Case law

Ayers Ratliff v. Wellington Exempted Village Schools Board Of Education

820 F.2d 792 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 10, 1987

Before MARTIN and MILBURN, Circuit Judges; and BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge. BAILEY BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge. 1 Defendants-Appellants Wellington Exempted Village Schools Board of Education (the Board) and Dr. … Healthy City School District Board of Education v.

Farley v. Cincinnati, H. & D. R. Co.

108 F. 14 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 2, 1901

Law (2d Ed.) 488; Brown v. Scarboro, 97 Ala. 316 , 12 South. 289 ; Railway Co. v. Williams, 91 Tex. 255 , 42 S. W. 855 ; Gardner v. New Haven & N. Co., 51 Conn. 143, 150 ; Railroad Co. v. O’Keefe, 168 Ill. 115 , 48 N. … Y. 289 ; Byrne v. Same, 104 N. Y. 362 , 10 N. E. 539 ; Railroad Co. v. White, 84 Va. 498 , 5 S. E. 573 ; Davis v. Railway Co., 58 Wis. 646 , 37 N. W. 406 ; Hooker v. Railroad Co., 76 Wis. 542 , 44 N. W. 1085 ; Troy v.

National Labor Relations Board, and Communication Workers of America, Intervenor v. North Electric Company

588 F.2d 213 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 14, 1978

The Board’s Decision and Order is reported at 225 NLRB No. 53 . We are satisfied that the Order of the Board is supported by substantial evidence on the record. … NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Order of the Board be, and it is, hereby enforced.

United States v. Samuel Lewis Brown

110 F.3d 65 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 3, 1997

United States v. Jones, 102 F.3d 804, 809 (6th Cir.1996). But see United States v. … But see United States v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Medical Mutual of Cleveland, Inc.

659 F.2d 726 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 17, 1981

The standard of review in Board cases is whether the Board’s decision is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole, including the body of evidence opposed to the Board’s view. Jim Causley Pontiac v. N. … Randall v. N. L. R. B., 638 F.2d 957 (6th Cir. 1981). Upon review, the Court has examined the record, including portions of the hearing held before the Administrative Law Judge.

National Labor Relations Board v. Stanley Air Tools, Division of the Stanley Works

432 F.2d 358 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 13, 1970

This case was first heard before National Labor Relations Board v. … this finding as well as the other findings of the Board.

Grand Lodge of Free & Accepted Masons, Masonic Home v. National Labor Relations Board

548 F.2d 1276 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 15, 1977

ORDER Upon consideration of the entire record and the arguments and briefs of counsel, we are of the opinion that the order of the Board is supported by substantial evidence, and that the Board did not commit any error of … It is therefore ORDERED that the order of the Board be enforced.

National Labor Relations Board v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Helpers & Taxicab Drivers, Local Union 327

432 F.2d 933 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 15, 1970

Respondent seeks to have the italicized portion of the order deleted and relies on this Court’s modification of a similar order in N.L.R.B. v. … , Local Union No. 327, (Greer Stop Nut Company), 160 N.L.R.B. 1919 (1966) ; Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Helpers and Taxicab Drivers, Local Union No. 327, (Hartman Luggage Company), 173 N.L.R.B. 220 (1969), modified, N.L.R.B. v.

United Parcel Service, Inc., Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner, David Dunning, Intervenor

228 F.3d 772 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 29, 2000

“The Board’s application of the law to the facts is also reviewed under the substantial evidence standard, and the Board’s reasonable inferences may not be displaced on review.” NLRB v. … UPS attempts to glean this argument from Rockingham Sleepwear, Inc., 188 N.L.R.B. 698 , 1971 WL 32368 (1971), and Transcon Lines v. Brown, 235 N.L.R.B. 1163 , 1978 WL 7496 (1978).

United States v. James Brown

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 3, 2021

Case No. 20-4052, United States v. Brown At the time of Brown’s motion, courts were divided on what qualified as extraordinary and compelling reasons to grant a defendant’s motion. … United States v. Elias, 984 F.3d 516, 518–20 (6th Cir. 2021); United States v.

The Benjamin Noble

244 F. 95 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 30, 1917

Since the board of directors of the corporation must be presumed to have exercised a supervision over its business, the board is to be charged with knowledge of the extent of the power usually exercised by its ship manager … C.) 44 Fed. 364, 365 ; Rudolf v. Brown (D. C.) 137 Fed. 106, 108, 109 ; and the same rule is recognized, though perhaps this was not necessary, in the decision of Richardson v. Harmon, 222 U. S. 96 , 103 to 106, 32 Sup.

Nathan H. Cohen v. United States of America

593 F.2d 766 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 12, 1979

Wright v. United States Board of Parole, 557 F.2d 74, 77 (1977). That holding is reflective of the clearly prevailing rule that judicial review of events occurring after sentence is properly had under § 2241. … Warden, 545 F.2d 286, 295-296 (2nd Cir. 1976); Harris v. Superintendent, 518 F.2d 1173, 1174 (4th Cir. 1975); United States v. Brown, 500 F.2d 375, 377 (4th Cir. 1974); Correale v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Child World, Inc. D/B/A Children's Palace

817 F.2d 1251 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 1, 1987

Meijer, Inc. v. NLRB, 564 F.2d 737, 740 (6th Cir.1977). … As such, the Board’s determination regarding the supervisory status of the line operators is not to be overturned as long as there is substantial evidence in the record as a whole to support its finding. NLRB v.

Board of Trustees of Hardy Tp. v. Brattleboro Sav. Bank

109 F. 1057 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 21, 1901

V & S Progalv, Inc., Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner

168 F.3d 270 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 19, 1999

V & S ProGalv, Inc. … In NLRB v.

Torbitt & Castleman, Inc., Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner

123 F.3d 899 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 19, 1997

NLRB v. Garon, 738 F.2d 140, 141 (6th Cir.1984). The assignment of credibility to witnesses is the prerogative of the Board. Ibid. … Additionally, the Board’s application of the law to the facts is reviewed under the substantial-evidence standard and the Board’s reasonable inferences drawn from those facts may not be displaced upon review. NLRB v.

Schimberg v. Cutler

142 F. 701 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 24, 1906

In Blodgett v. … Salem, 3 Allen, 374 ; Dickey v. Maine Tel. Co., 46 Me. 483 ; Brown v. Skowhegan, 82 Me. 273 , 19 Atl. 399 ; Sykes v. Pawlet, 43 Vt. 446 , 5 Am. Rep. 595 ; Goodin v. City of Des Moines, 55 Iowa, 67 , 7 N.

Bowater North America Corp. v. Murray Machinery, Inc.

773 F.2d 71 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 16, 1985

Plaintiff relies on Browning v. Holloway, 620 S.W.2d 611 (Tex.Civ.App.1981), to support the argument that the trial court erred in rendering judgment without affording plaintiff a jury trial. … Thus, the instant case is distinguishable and is taken out of the purview of the undeveloped state of facts found in Browning . In further contrast to Browning , plaintiffs underlying claim is unliquidated.

National Labor Relations Board v. Centra, Inc. Central Transport, Inc. Central Cartage Company

59 F.3d 30 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 13, 1995

CONSENT JUDGMENT This court having on January 17, 1992, entered its judgment enforcing the Board’s decision and order issued in Board Case Nos. 8-CA-19212 and 8-CA-19282 against Respondent, Centra, Inc.; Central Transport … , Inc.; and Central Cartage Company, its officers, agents, successors, and assigns, and the parties by a stipulation dated April 6, 1995, having consented to the entry of a consent judgment enforcing a supplemental Board

Bowling Transportation, Inc., Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner

352 F.3d 274 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 15, 2004

NLRB v. General Security Services Corp., 162 F.3d 437, 441 (6th Cir.1998). Conflicts in testimony give rise to fact and credibility calls for the Board to resolve. NLRB v. … to the Board's view.' " Loral Defense Systems-Akron v.