Case law

Brown v. City of Royal Oak

202 F. App'x 62 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 18, 2006

Brown relies on Nasierowski Brothers Investment Co. v. … In Bigelow v. Mich.

National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. Great Scot, Inc., Respondent/cross-Petitioner

39 F.3d 678 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 14, 1994

. v. … San Francisco Local Joint Executive Board of Culinary Workers, and Robert Cassel, 207 NLRB 199 , 205 (1973). See also NLRB v.

Integrated Health Services of Michigan, at Riverbend, Inc., Petitioner/cross-Respondent, Teamsters Local 332 (97-6034), Intervenor v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner

191 F.3d 703 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 17, 1999

Beverly California Corp. v. … Ctr. v. NLRB, 156 F.3d 405 , 412-13 (2d Cir. 1998) (rejecting Sixth Circuit approach); Schnuck Markets v. NLRB, 961 F.2d 700, 703 (8th Cir. 1992); NLRB v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Mr. Porto, Inc., D/B/A Custom Display Studios

590 F.2d 637 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 29, 1978

This cause is distinguishable from NLRB v. … NLRB v. Mattison Machine Works, 365 U.S. 123 , 81 S.Ct. 434 , 5 L.Ed.2d 455 (1961); NLRB v. Bostik Division, USM Corp., 517 F.2d 971, 975 (6th Cir. 1975); NLRB v.

Brown v. Piper

64 F.3d 662 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 9, 1995

Elliot James BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Paul J. PIPER, M.D.; Henry Grayson; N'Dubisi Izima; Jerome Wisneski; Timothy Barth; Eric P. … As Brown does not challenge the imposition of costs, any such challenge is considered abandoned on appeal. Boyd v.

National Labor Relations Board v. General Drivers, Salesmen, Warehousemen & Helpers, Local Union 984

251 F.2d 494 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 23, 1958

251 F.2d 494 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … This was in violation of Section 8(b)(4)(A) of the National Labor Relations Board Act. See National Labor Relations Board v.

Chandler v. Brown

62 F.3d 1417 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 27, 1995

Fred Darnell CHANDLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert BROWN, Jr.; Dean Rieger; Larry Donovan; John Cason; Duane Corey; Travis Jones; Dr. Husain; J. Epp; David E. King; W. … Will v.

Kenneth B. McLean D/B/A Ken's Building Supplies v. National Labor Relations Board

333 F.2d 84 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 9, 1964

B. v. … B. v.

Sheila White, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co., Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee

364 F.3d 789 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 14, 2004

In November 1995, while her lawsuit was still pending, the Vanderbilt Board of Trustees reversed the decision of the dean and rehired her as a tenured professor. Id. … The board also granted her back pay to account for the delayed promotion and the period of unemployment. Id.

Polkow v. CSX Trans

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 18, 2005

Brown I. … The controlling authority on removal jurisdiction begins with Franchise Tax Board of The State of California v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern California, 463 U.S. 1 (1983).

Martin v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority

83 F. App'x 114 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 8, 2003

Board of Pardons v. Allen, 482 U.S. 369, 373 , 107 S.Ct. 2415 , 96 L.Ed.2d 303 (1987). *115 This court has also held that parole regulations do not create federal constitutional rights, Sweeton v. … Brown, 27 F.3d 1162, 1164-65 (6th Cir.1994) (en banc), and that, because parole is discretionary, there is no federal due process right involved. Inmates of Orient Corr. Inst. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Child World, Inc. D/B/A Children's Palace

817 F.2d 1251 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 1, 1987

Meijer, Inc. v. NLRB, 564 F.2d 737, 740 (6th Cir.1977). … As such, the Board’s determination regarding the supervisory status of the line operators is not to be overturned as long as there is substantial evidence in the record as a whole to support its finding. NLRB v.

Commissioner v. National Land & Construction Co.

70 F.2d 349 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 13, 1934

Compare United States v. Chicago & E. I. R. Co. (D. C.) 298 F. 779, 781 ; United Thacker Coal Co. v. Commissioner (C. C. A.) 46 F.(2d) 231, 233 ; Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. Burnet, 282 U. S. 283, 286 , 51 S. … In holding that there was not a failure to file a return, the Board of Tax Appeals relied on United States v. Tillinghast, 55 F.(2d) 279 (District Court, R.

Board of Trustees of Hardy Tp. v. Brattleboro Sav. Bank

109 F. 1057 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 21, 1901

Eric Brown v. City of Wyoming, Mich.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 9, 2024

See, e.g., Brown v. Lewis, 779 F.3d 401, 415 (6th Cir. 2015); United States v. Rogers, 861 F. App’x 8, 14 (6th Cir. 2021). -7- No. 23-1285, Brown v. … - 10 - No. 23-1285, Brown v.

Torbitt & Castleman, Inc., Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner

123 F.3d 899 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 19, 1997

NLRB v. Garon, 738 F.2d 140, 141 (6th Cir.1984). The assignment of credibility to witnesses is the prerogative of the Board. Ibid. … Additionally, the Board’s application of the law to the facts is reviewed under the substantial-evidence standard and the Board’s reasonable inferences drawn from those facts may not be displaced upon review. NLRB v.

Mills v. Dir OWCP

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 27, 2003

Goldberg, Board where it is supported by substantial evidence and in UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, OFFICE conformance with the applicable law. Glen Coal Co. v. … Brown v. Rock Creek Mining Co., 996 F.2d 812, 816 (6th Cir. 1993). First, Mrs.

United States v. Madden

515 F.3d 601 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 25, 2008

United States v. … See United States v. Ferguson, 456 F.3d 660, 664 (6th Cir.2006). Brown’s sentence is therefore presumptively reasonable. See, e.g., United States v. Heriot, 496 F.3d 601, 608 (6th Cir.2007).

Detroit Housing Commission v. Lewis

226 F.2d 180 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 5, 1955

To the same effect is Barrows v. Jackson, 346 U.S. 249 , 73 S.Ct. 1031 , 97 L.Ed. 1586 , decided in 1953. See also Dawson v. Mayor, 4 Cir., 220 F.2d 386 , which holds that the ruling of Brown v. … Due to the pendency of the proceedings in this court there has been another appropriate delay in view of the possible application of Brown v.

Arthur W. Einstein and Jean M. Einstein v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Robert M. Brown and Margaret L. Brown v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, G. Glen Anderson and Naomi D. Anderson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

230 F.2d 951 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 24, 1956

Einstein, Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. Robert M. BROWN and Margaret L. Brown, Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. G. Glen ANDERSON and Naomi D. … Anderson, Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. Nos. 12545-12547. United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit. Feb. 24, 1956.