Case law

Application of Robert Edward Lipscomb for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

408 F.2d 1003 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 7, 1969

In Hill v. … United States v. Hayman, 342 U.S. 205 , 72 S.Ct. 263 , 96 L.Ed. 232 ; Burdette v. Settle, 8 Cir., 296 F.2d 687 ; Simmons v. United States, 8 Cir., 253 F.2d 909 .” In Brown v. Warden, U. S.

Richard Hayes v. The Board of Regents of Kentucky State University, a Body Corporate

495 F.2d 1326 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 25, 1974

Hayes v. Board of Regents of Kentucky State University, 362 F.Supp. 1172 (E.D.Ky.1973). … Vlandis v. Kline, supra.

Consolidated Television Cable Service, Inc. v. City of Frankfort

857 F.2d 354 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 21, 1988

Brown, 317 U.S. 341 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943). … The state action immunity doctrine was established in 1943 in Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943).

Kraus v. Board Of County Road Commissioners For The County Of Kent

385 F.2d 864 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 30, 1967

Trbovich v. City of Detroit, 378 Mich. 79 , 142 N.W.2d 696 (1966); Boike v. … Trbovich v.

Landay v. United States

108 F.2d 698 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 14, 1939

In Valli v. … Yeiser v. U. S. Board & Paper Co., 6 Cir., 107 F. 340, 348, 349 , 52 L.R.A. 724 ; McCandless, Receiver v. Furlaud, supra.

The Painting Company, Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner

298 F.3d 492 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 6, 2002

one.”); NLRB v. … NLRB, 768 F.2d 778, 781 (6th Cir.1985) (quoting NLRB v. Browning-Ferris Indus. of Pennsylvania, Inc., 691 F.2d 1117, 1124 (3d Cir.1982)).

United States v. Clyde Eugene Garner, United States of America v. Lorene Brown, United States of America v. Dennis Dwayne Garner

529 F.2d 962 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 19, 1976

In Prussian v. … In addition, he notes that the Parole Board would not consider his application for parole from his South Carolina conviction until the Tennessee case was terminated.

National Labor Relations Board v. J. W. Saltsman, D.B.A. Saltsman Construction Company

283 F.2d 472 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 22, 1960

We have duly considered the issues presented on this petition for review of the order of the National Labor Relations Board; and, After considering the record and the oral arguments and briefs of the attorneys, we are of … opinion that the order of the labor board should be enforced, save in one respect: Namely, the respondent should not be required, as ordered by the board, to reimburse those of the respondent’s employees who were members

National Labor Relations Board v. Production Molded Plastics, Inc. And Detroit Plastic Molding Co.

604 F.2d 451 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 16, 1979

Fibre-board Corp. v. NLRB, supra 379 U.S. at 213 , 85 S.Ct. at 404. Finally, we find further support for our position in the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in Ford Motor Co. v. … This case, therefore, is one of those situations in which we should “recognize without hesitation the primary function and responsibility of the Board . . .,” Labor Board v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Continental Corporation of Michigan, Inc. Dba Holiday Inn West

612 F.2d 257 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 26, 1979

The Board issued a bargaining order and this appeal was brought. 1 As a general rule, the N.L.R.B. has very broad discretion in determining bargaining units. In Packard Motor Car Co. v. … It involves of necessity a large measure of informed discretion, and the decision of the Board, if not final, is rarely to be disturbed.” See Mei-jer, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 564 F.2d 737 (6th Cir. 1977).

United States v. Travis D. Brown

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 30, 2023

Brown argues that he did not act -5- Case No. 22-3478, United States v. … Brown A below-Guidelines sentence like Brown’s is presumptively reasonable. United States v. Pirosko, 787 F.3d 358, 374 (6th Cir. 2015).

Detroit Housing Commission v. Lewis

226 F.2d 180 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 5, 1955

To the same effect is Barrows v. Jackson, 346 U.S. 249 , 73 S.Ct. 1031 , 97 L.Ed. 1586 , decided in 1953. See also Dawson v. Mayor, 4 Cir., 220 F.2d 386 , which holds that the ruling of Brown v. … Due to the pendency of the proceedings in this court there has been another appropriate delay in view of the possible application of Brown v.

National Labor Relations Board v. The Mead Corporation D/B/A Escanaba Paper Company

73 F.3d 74 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 8, 1996

Evidence is substantial when, viewing the record as a whole, reasonable minds would find the evidence sufficient to uphold the Board’s decision. NLRB v. Spring Arbor Dist. … See Linn v.

Dtr Industries, Inc., Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner

39 F.3d 106 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 3, 1994

In Indiana Cal-Pro, Inc. v. … For example, in NLRB v.

Gibson v. United States

161 F.2d 973 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 2, 1947

On February 8, 1946, the Good Time Forfeiture Board recommended to the Warden at Milan, Mich., that the good time which appellant had earned on the five year sentence be forfeited and the Warden imposed the forfeiture on … See Brown v. Johnston, Warden, 9 Cir., 91 F.2d 370, 372 . There is obviously no merit in appellant’s contention that he is undergoing double punishment for the same offense. See Pagliaro v.

Detroit Edison Co. v. Securities & Exchange Commission

119 F.2d 730 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 12, 1941

United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Association, 166 U.S. 290, 308 , 17 S.Ct. 540 , 41 L.Ed 1007; Labor Board v. Newport News Company, 308 U.S. 241 , 60 S.Ct. 203 , 84 L.Ed. 219 . … Company v. Commissioners, 113 U.S. 33, 39 , 5 S.Ct. 352 , 28 L.Ed. 899 ; Massachusetts v. Mellon, 262 U.S. 447, 488 , 43 S.Ct. 597 , 67 L.Ed. 1078 ; State of Texas v.

United States v. Lewis Brown

95 F.3d 1153 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 26, 1996

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lewis BROWN, Defendant-Appellee. No. 96-3074. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Aug. 26, 1996. … United States v. Hawkins, 969 F.2d 169, 174 (6th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1069 (1993). Errors of law amount to an abuse of discretion. See Golden v. Kelsey-Hayes Co., 73 F.3d 648, 653 (6th Cir.1996).

National Labor Relations Board v. Superex Drugs, Inc. And Superex Drugs of Kentucky, Inc.

341 F.2d 747 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 21, 1965

If facts are open rto conflicting inferences, we are not at liberty to draw an inference different from the one drawn by the Board, even though it may seem more plausible and reasonable to us. N. L. R. B. v. … B. v. Link-Belt Co., 311 U.S. 584, 596-597 , 61 S.Ct. 358 , 85 L.Ed. 368 ; N. L. R. B. v. Wayne W. Wilson Co., 311 F.2d 1 , C.A. 6; and N. L. R. B. v. Ellis & Watts Products, Inc., 297 F.2d 576 , C.A. 6.

Hadley v. Werner

753 F.2d 514 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 28, 1985

of Commissioners, Board of Auditors, and Treasurer, and the State of Michigan. … In Preiser v.

Ayers Ratliff v. Wellington Exempted Village Schools Board Of Education

820 F.2d 792 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 10, 1987

Before MARTIN and MILBURN, Circuit Judges; and BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge. BAILEY BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge. 1 Defendants-Appellants Wellington Exempted Village Schools Board of Education (the Board) and Dr. … Healthy City School District Board of Education v.