Case law

Harold Warren v. Manufacturers National Bank of Detroit, a National Banking Association

759 F.2d 542 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 16, 1985

We find plaintiff’s reliance on Schact v. Brown, 711 F.2d 1343 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 509 , 78 L.Ed.2d 698 (1983), to be misplaced. … United States v. Monasterski Investment Co., 567 F.2d 677, 682 (6th Cir.1977); cf. Harris v.

Ronald Weaver Leo McKaye Morris Martin v. Raymond Toombs Robert Brown, Jr. Donald Mason Robert Mulvaney Ted Strassburg

948 F.2d 1004 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 6, 1991

Flint v. … Swan v.

Kraus v. Board Of County Road Commissioners For The County Of Kent

385 F.2d 864 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 30, 1967

Trbovich v. City of Detroit, 378 Mich. 79 , 142 N.W.2d 696 (1966); Boike v. … Trbovich v.

The Painting Company, Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner

298 F.3d 492 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 6, 2002

one.”); NLRB v. … NLRB, 768 F.2d 778, 781 (6th Cir.1985) (quoting NLRB v. Browning-Ferris Indus. of Pennsylvania, Inc., 691 F.2d 1117, 1124 (3d Cir.1982)).

National Labor Relations Board v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Helpers & Taxicab Drivers, Local Union 327

419 F.2d 1282 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 15, 1970

Communications Workers of America v. NLRB, 362 U.S. 479 , 80 S.Ct. *1284 838 , 4 L.Ed.2d 896 (1960); NLRB v. Express Publishing Co., 312 U.S. 426 , 61 S.Ct. 693 , 85 L.Ed. 930 (1941). … Under these circumstances, the Board may be justified in issuing a broad order, which is not limited to union activity at the Hartmann Luggage Company. NLRB v. Locals 138, 138A, 138B, 377 F.2d 528 (2d Cir. 1967).

Christine Brandenburg, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Housing Authority of Irvine Perry Meade, Individually and as Commissioner and Chairperson of the Housing Authority of Irvine Jane Bryant, Tom Williams, Glenn Cox, and Hugh Hamilton, Individually and as Commissioners of the Housing Authority of Irvine, Defendants-Appellees/cross-Appellants

253 F.3d 891 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 6, 2001

McKinley v. City of Eloy, 705 F.2d 1110, 1114 (9th Cir. 1983). Such matters of public concern are to be contrasted with internal personnel disputes or complaints about an employer's performance. See, e.g., Brown v. … See Albright v.

National Labor Relations Board v. J. W. Saltsman, D.B.A. Saltsman Construction Company

283 F.2d 472 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 22, 1960

We have duly considered the issues presented on this petition for review of the order of the National Labor Relations Board; and, After considering the record and the oral arguments and briefs of the attorneys, we are of … opinion that the order of the labor board should be enforced, save in one respect: Namely, the respondent should not be required, as ordered by the board, to reimburse those of the respondent’s employees who were members

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,191 General Acquisition, Inc. v. Gencorp, Inc., Shearson Lehman Brothers, Inc., Wagner & Brown

23 F.3d 1022 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 6, 1994

We dismissed the appeal in McIntyre v. … Employment Division v.

Sharondale Corp. v. Ross

42 F.3d 993 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 16, 1994

See Faulk v. Peabody Coal Co., 14 BLR 1-18 (1990). Thus, according to the Board, subsequent filings need not comply with the statute of limitations. … Brown v. Rock Creek Mining Co., 996 F.2d 812, 816 (6th Cir.1993) (citing Wolf Creek Collieries v. Robinson, 872 F.2d 1264, 1268 (6th Cir.1989)); Saginaw Mining Co., 818 F.2d at 1283 . In Pauley v.

Reed v. Rhodes

179 F.3d 453 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 10, 1999

Brown v. Board of Educ. (Brown I), 347 U.S. 483, 495 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954). … See Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1 , 78 S.Ct. 1401 , 3 L.Ed.2d 5 (1958); Green v. New Kent County, 391 U.S. 430 , 88 S.Ct. 1689 , 20 L.Ed.2d 716 (1968); Swann v.

Ohio Republican Party v. Brunner

544 F.3d 711 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 14, 2008

Browning, 522 F.3d 1153 (11th Cir.2008), offer no support for a contrary interpretation. … Since Maine v.

Kentucky ex rel. United Pacific Insurance v. Laurel County

805 F.2d 628 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 14, 1986

On April 17, 1970, Browning certified that $116,666.59 was due and payable to taxpayer Y & S. … In Blanton v.

Vemco, Inc., Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner

79 F.3d 526 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 22, 1996

YHA, Inc. v. NLRB, 2 F.3d 168, 172 (6th Cir.1993) (citing Krispy Kreme Doughnut Corp. v. NLRB, 732 F.2d 1288 , 1290 (6th Cir.1984)). … NLRB v. Marsden, 701 F.2d 238, 242 (2d Cir.1983).

Application of Robert Edward Lipscomb for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

408 F.2d 1003 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 7, 1969

In Hill v. … United States v. Hayman, 342 U.S. 205 , 72 S.Ct. 263 , 96 L.Ed. 232 ; Burdette v. Settle, 8 Cir., 296 F.2d 687 ; Simmons v. United States, 8 Cir., 253 F.2d 909 .” In Brown v. Warden, U. S.

Maxine B. Cousin v. Don Sundquist State Election Commission Brook Thompson Hamilton County Election Commission Carolyn Jackson

145 F.3d 818 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 10, 1998

See Brown v. … V.

Rowan v. Traughber

48 F. App'x 489 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 17, 2002

See Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 486-87 , 114 S.Ct. 2364 , 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994); Butterfield v. Bail, 120 F.3d 1023, 1024-25 (9th Cir.1997). … See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e; Brown v. Toombs, 139 F.3d 1102, 1103-04 (6th Cir.1998). Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is affirmed. Rule 34(j)(2)(C), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Spitzer Great Lakes Ltd., Company v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

173 F.3d 412 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 14, 1999

See also Brown v. National Transp. Safety Bd., 795 F.2d 576, 579 (6th Cir.1986). … EPA Region V filed a motion to dismiss the appeal as untimely, and the Board granted that motion.

Simon Brown-El, Jr. v. Steven MacKillop William Gordon, Officer Mark MacHulis Sgt.

37 F.3d 1498 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 7, 1994

Because Brown-El did not receive notice of his right to object to the report, the merits of Brown-El's complaint are reviewable on appeal. See Landefeld v. Marion Gen. … Thus, Brown-El received all the due process to which he was entitled. Hewitt, 459 U.S. at 476 ; Black v.

United States v. City of Detroit

138 F.2d 418 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 18, 1943

with the statute of the State of Michigan requiring the lien, upon recording, to specifically describe real estate belonging to the taxpayer, is the same as the issue decided adversely to the appellant in United States v.

Meijer, Inc., Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner

463 F.3d 534 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 21, 2006

The legal conclusions of the Board are entitled to deference. We “recognize the Board’s special function of applying the general provisions of the Act to the complexities of industrial life.” NLRB v. … The Board’s construction of the Act is permissible where it does not “exceed the reach” of the Act and “the Board has adequately explicated the basis of its interpretation.” NLRB v. J.