Case law

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 648 v. National Labor Relations Board

440 F.2d 1184 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 15, 1971

NLRB v. Yale Mfg. Co., 356 F.2d 69 (1st Cir. 1966); Metal Blast, Inc. v. NLRB, 324 F.2d 602 (6th Cir. 1963). See also Deering Milliken, Inc. v. Johnston, 295 F.2d 856 (4th Cir. 1961). … See NLRB v. J. H. Rutter-Rex Mfg. Co., 396 U.S. 258, 264-266 , 90 S.Ct. 417 , 24 L.Ed.2d 405 (1969). We find no abuse of discretion in the orders of the Trial Examiner. Enforcement of the orders of the Board is granted.

Board of Trustees of Painesville Township Mayridge Construction Company v. City of Painesville, Ohio

200 F.3d 396 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 29, 1999

Ludwig v. Board of Trustees of Ferris State Univ., 123 F.3d 404, 408 (6th Cir.1997). … See Hallstrom v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Rudolph B. Zawadzki D/B/A Maria Security Service

471 F.2d 612 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 31, 1973

Respondent failed to answer the unfair' labor practice charge filed before the Board as required by Section 102.20 of the Board’s Rules and Regulations, Series 8, as amended. … It is therefore ordered that the Board’s application for the entry of summary judgment be and is hereby granted and the Board’s order be and is hereby enforced.

National Labor Relations Board v. Floyd Epperson and United Dairy Farmers, Inc.

491 F.2d 1390 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 12, 1974

The two issues on appeal are whether the Board’s finding of joint employment is supported by the record, and whether there is substantial evidence on the record as a whole to support the Board’s finding that Epperson and … The order of enforcement entered by the Board is consistent with its finding of joint employment and Section 8(a)(1) violation. The Board’s order will therefore be enforced.

National Labor Relations Board v. Nashville Building and Construction Trades Council, John J. A. Reynolds, Jr., Regional Director of the Twenty-Sixth Region of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on Behalf of the National Labor Relations Board v. Nashville Building and Construction Trades Council, Nashville Building and Construction Trades Council v. Frank W. McCulloch Sam Zagoria, John H. Fanning, Gerald A. Brown, and Howard Jenkins, Jr., as Chairman and Members of the National Labor Relations Board, 1717 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D. C.

383 F.2d 562 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 5, 1967

REYNOLDS, Jr., Regional Director of the Twenty-Sixth Region of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on Behalf of the National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner-Appellee, v. … Brown, and Howard Jenkins, Jr., as Chairman and Members of the National Labor Relations Board, 1717 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D. C., Respondents. No. 18016. No. 17688. No. 17956.

National Labor Relations Board v. Kahn's and Company, Division of Consolidated Food Company

694 F.2d 1070 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 16, 1982

rights under Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act, NLRB v. … The court is therefore of the opinion that this case is controlled by Gen *1072 eral Motors v.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Board of Trustees of Wayne County Community College

723 F.2d 509 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 21, 1983

The defendant is a publicly elected college governing board. … .-124(a) & (b) (board has power to “contract with, appoint, and employ” administrator and other teachers and employees); id. § 389.121(a) (board acquires, constructs, leases and maintains all facilities); id. § 389.127 (board

United States v. Derrick Brown

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 26, 2024

Brown does not protest that the government failed to raise this argument below and thus we need not treat the point as forfeited. See L.C. v. … Nat’l Org. 5 Case No. 22-3470, United States v. Brown for Women, Inc., 537 U.S. 393, 409 (2003).

Brown v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government

483 F. App'x 221 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 12, 2012

No. 10-5846 Brown v. … - 12 - No. 10-5846 Brown v.

Brickner v. Voinovich

977 F.2d 235 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 3, 1992

See generally Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 541 , 105 S.Ct. 1487, 1492 , 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985); Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569-70 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2705 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … See generally Brown v. Crowe, 963 F.2d 895, 897-98 (6th Cir.1992); Taft Broadcasting Co. v. United States, 929 F.2d 240, 243-44 (6th Cir.1991); Estate of Quirk v. Commissioner, 928 F.2d 751 , 757-59 (6th Cir.1991).

Gilken Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.

176 F.2d 141 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 14, 1949

Justice Brandeis cited the opinion of this court in Board v. Commissioner, 6 Cir., 51 F.2d 73, 75, 76 . It was pointed out in Ford v. … In Brown v.

Ohio Republican Party v. Brunner

544 F.3d 711 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 14, 2008

Browning, 522 F.3d 1153 (11th Cir.2008), offer no support for a contrary interpretation. … Since Maine v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Allen Manufacturing Company, Inc., D/B/A Fabuglas Company

364 F.2d 814 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 19, 1966

Celanese Corp. of America v. N. L. R. B., 291 F.2d 224 (C.A.7, 1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 925 , 82 S.Ct. 360 , 7 L.Ed.2d 189 (1961); N. L. R. B. v. Bonnie Enterprises, Inc., 341 F.2d 712 (C.A.4, 1965). … [Olson Rug Co. v. N. L. R. B., 260 F.2d 255, 256 (C.A.7, 1958)]. On the whole record we believe there was substantial evidence to support the result reached by the NLRB. Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R.

Central Broadcasting Corporation, D/B/A Weno v. National Labor Relations Board

441 F.2d 1145 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 7, 1971

The Board argues that the doctrine of N. L. R. B. v. Washington Aluminum Co., 370 U.S. 9 , 82 S.Ct. 1099 , 8 L.Ed.2d 298 (1962), governs our decision in this matter. … B. v. Lion Oil Company, 352 U.S. 282, 293 , 77 S.Ct. 330, 336 , 1 L.Ed.2d 331 (1957)). The petition for review is dismissed and the order of the National Labor Relations Board is enforced.

National Labor Relations Board v. E.L. Rice and Company of Southgate, Inc.

524 F.2d 1148 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 13, 1975

ORDER On receipt and consideration of an application for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board, reported at 213 N.L.R.B. … representative of the employees in the respondent’s bargaining unit and that said conclusion is supported by substantial evidence upon the whole record; Now, therefore, the application for enforcement of the order of the Board

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,191 General Acquisition, Inc. v. Gencorp, Inc., Shearson Lehman Brothers, Inc., Wagner & Brown

23 F.3d 1022 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 6, 1994

We dismissed the appeal in McIntyre v. … Employment Division v.

Kentucky ex rel. United Pacific Insurance v. Laurel County

805 F.2d 628 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 14, 1986

On April 17, 1970, Browning certified that $116,666.59 was due and payable to taxpayer Y & S. … In Blanton v.

Reed v. Rhodes

179 F.3d 453 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 10, 1999

Brown v. Board of Educ. (Brown I), 347 U.S. 483, 495 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954). … See Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1 , 78 S.Ct. 1401 , 3 L.Ed.2d 5 (1958); Green v. New Kent County, 391 U.S. 430 , 88 S.Ct. 1689 , 20 L.Ed.2d 716 (1968); Swann v.

Harborside Healthcare, Inc., Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner

230 F.3d 206 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 18, 2000

We review the Board’s ultimate determination generally for abuse of discretion. See NLRB v. St. Francis Healthcare Centre, 212 F.3d 945, 951-52, 963 (6th Cir.2000); NLRB v. … Holly Farms Corp. v.

Harold Warren v. Manufacturers National Bank of Detroit, a National Banking Association

759 F.2d 542 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 16, 1985

We find plaintiff’s reliance on Schact v. Brown, 711 F.2d 1343 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 509 , 78 L.Ed.2d 698 (1983), to be misplaced. … United States v. Monasterski Investment Co., 567 F.2d 677, 682 (6th Cir.1977); cf. Harris v.