Case law

National Labor Relations Board v. Thurston Motor Lines, Inc.

439 F.2d 1202 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 30, 1971

This cause is before the Court on the National Labor Relations Board’s petition to enforce, and upon the Thurston Motor Lines, Inc.’s cross-petition to review, a Labor Board order requiring the Company to: reinstate employee … Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951).

National Labor Relations Board v. The Gates Rubber Company

493 F.2d 249 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 5, 1974

However one-sided such resolutions may have been, this attitude does not permit us to take over the function of the examiner or the Board, which affirmed the Administrative Law Judge’s findings. N.L.R.B. v. … Notwithstanding the broadened powers of review given to us by the decision in Universal Camera Corp. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. The Lima Lumber Company

437 F.2d 455 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 2, 1971

The relief granted by the Board was broader than that granted by the trial examiner. … We are also satisfied that the relief given was within the sound discretion of the board. N. L. R. B. v. Ellis and Watts Products, Inc., 344 F.2d 67 (C.A.6, 1965). Enforcement granted.

Mead Digital Systems, Inc. Mead Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. A.B. Dick Company and Gould, Inc., Cross-Appellees

723 F.2d 455 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 8, 1983

See, e.g., Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse, 170 U.S. 537 , 569, 18 S.Ct. 707, 723 , 42 L.Ed. 1136 (1898); Acme Highway Product Corp. v. D.S. Brown Co., 473 F.2d 849 (6th Cir.1973). … In Graham v.

John B. Anderson v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Jr., in His Official Capacity as Secretary of State of the State of Ohio

664 F.2d 554 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 4, 1981

Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724 , 94 S.Ct. 1274 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714 (1974). … Storer v. Brown, supra; See also Rosario v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Hartzell Propeller Fan Company

435 F.2d 562 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 8, 1971

ORDER This case is before the Court on the application of the National Labor Relations Board to enforce its order against respondent. The decision and order of the Board are reported at 173 N.L.R.B. No. 163. … Reference is made to the decision of the Board for a complete recitation of the facts. We find that the decision of the Board is supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole. N. L. R. B. v.

Atlas Engine Works, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

435 F.2d 558 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 28, 1970

B. v. Gissel Packing Company, 395 U.S. 575 , 89 S.Ct. 1918 , 23 L.Ed.2d 547 (1969). … The company’s petition to review and set aside the Supplemental Decision of the Board must be denied and enforcement of the order of the Board must be granted. It is so ordered.

National Labor Relations Board v. The Natural Gas Utility District of Hawkins County, Tennessee

427 F.2d 312 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 17, 1970

The Board declined to follow the decision of Tennessee’s highest court, relying instead on NLRB v. Randolph Elec. … of the Supreme Court in R.F.C. v.

Wolgast Corporation, Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner

349 F.3d 250 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 16, 2003

We review de novo the Board’s interpretation of Supreme Court and Sixth Circuit decisions, and uphold the Board’s “reasonably defensible” construction of the Act in the absence of binding precedent. See Meijer v. … See Meijer Inc. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Jack C. Robinson, D/B/A Robinson Freight Lines

251 F.2d 639 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 7, 1958

National Labor Relations Board v. Mackay Radio & Telegraph Company, supra, 304 U.S. 345 , 58 S.Ct. 910 . Cf. Hamilton v. … The Board was vested with discretion to refuse to allow the charges against respondent to be withdrawn, National Labor Relations Board v.

Collins v. Frisbie

189 F.2d 464 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 28, 1951

In Brown v. … See Hatfield v. Warden of State Prison, D.C.E.D. Mich., 88 F.Supp. 690, 691 ; Ex parte Brown, D.C.E.D.Mich., 90 F.Supp. 50 . Moreover, the district judge in the instant case has ignored our decision in Brown v.

National Labor Relations Board v. White Chapel Memorial Association

414 F.2d 236 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 24, 1969

N.L.R.B. v. Reliance Fuel Corp., 371 U.S. 224, 226 , 83 S.Ct. 312 , 9 L.Ed.2d 279 ; Guss v. Utah Labor Relations Board, 353 U.S. 1, 3 , 77 S.Ct. 598 , 1 L.Ed.2d 601 ; Polish Alliance of United States v. … We hold that the Board had jurisdiction over the Cemetery Association. See N.L.R.B. v. Inglewood Park Cemetery Assn., 355 F.2d 448 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, First Congregational *238 Church of Los Angeles v.

Williams Ex Rel. Hart v. Paint Valley Local School District

400 F.3d 360 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 9, 2005

The parties agree that the leading cases addressing this claim are Davis v. Monroe County Board of Education, 526 U.S. 629 (1999), and Gebser v. Lago Vista Independent School District, 524 U.S. 274 (1998). … See City of Canton v. Harris, 489 U.S. 378, 388-89, 109 S.Ct. 1197, 1204-05, 103 L.Ed.2d 412 (1989); see also Thelma D. v. Board of Educ. of City of St. Louis, 934 F.2d 929, 932-33 (8th Cir. 1991).

National Labor Relations Board v. Aquabrom, Division of Great Lakes Chemical Corp.

855 F.2d 1174 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 24, 1988

The Board began its analysis by stating the well-settled rule, upheld in Golden State Bottling Co. v. … NLRB v. Cott Corp., 578 F.2d 892, 894-95 (1st Cir.1978). In our view, the Cott case is distinguishable. In Cott, the Board, on the authority of NLRB v.

Masterson v. Pergament

203 F.2d 315 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 23, 1953

Brown, met with Chess. Brown explained some of the facts of the Graham-Paige transaction to Chess, and they also discussed the Fleet-wings controversy and the matter of the lease of the Long Beach plant. … It was said in Winkelman v.

Charles E. Lewis v. National Labor Relations Board, United Parcel Service, Inc., Intervenor

779 F.2d 12 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 10, 1985

See NLRB v. Magnetics International, Inc., 699 F.2d 806, 811 (6th Cir.1983) (“[W]e will not require [that the] evidence that the unfair labor charge was presented and considered be in written form_”). … The petition for review is denied, and the decision of the Board is affirmed.

National Labor Relations Board v. International Brotherhood of Firemen & Oilers, Afl-Cio

38 F.3d 1216 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 18, 1994

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF FIREMEN & OILERS, AFL-CIO, Respondent. No. 94-5957. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Oct. 18, 1994. … JUDGMENT 1 This cause was submitted upon the application of the National Labor Relations Board (the "Board") for the enforcement of a certain order issued by it against the respondent International Brotherhood of Firemen

National Labor Relations Board v. City Yellow Cab Company and G. I. Cab Company

344 F.2d 575 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 20, 1965

B. v. Crystal Laundry & Dry Cleaning Co., 308 F.2d 626 (C.A. 6); N. L. R. B. v. … B. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Centra, Inc. Central Transport, Inc. And Central Cartage Company

954 F.2d 366 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 29, 1994

The AU credited the testimony of Gruszezynski and Brown on these matters. … Grainger, Inc. v. NLRB, 860 F.2d 244 ," 247 (7th Cir.1988). The Board’s factual determination on this issue is entitled to summary affirmance as Centra has failed to chai- *371 lenge the Board's order on the merits.

George and Carolyn Higgins v. Board of Education of the City of Grand Rapids

508 F.2d 779 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 6, 1974

See Goss v. Board of Education, 340 F.Supp. 711 (E.D.Tenn.1972). … The same distinction applies to the case of Oliver v. Kalamazoo Board of Education, 508 F.2d 178 (6th Cir. 1974). Brinkman v.