Case law

United Paperworkers International Union v. National Labor Relations Board, Georgia-Pacific Corporation, Intervenor

981 F.2d 861 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 2, 1992

Because each of the Board’s findings were based on substantial evidence, we AFFIRM the Board’s order adopting the AU’s findings made in accordance with settled principles of labor law. A. In NLRB v. … In NLRB v.

United Association of Journeymen v. National Labor Relations Board

655 F.2d 93 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 17, 1981

P 13,086 UNITED ASSOCIATION OF JOURNEYMEN AND APPRENTICES OF the PLUMBING AND PIPEFITTING INDUSTRY OF the UNITED STATES AND CANADA, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 388, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. … ORDER 1 This matter is before the court upon cross-petitions for review and enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board reported at 245 N.L.R.B.

National Labor Relations Board v. Wilker Brothers Company, Inc.

652 F.2d 660 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 30, 1981

The findings of the Board must be affirmed if supported by substantial evidence. See 29 U.S.C. § 160 (e); DeLorean Cadillac, Inc. v. NLRB, 614 F.2d 554, 555 (6th Cir. 1980) (Order). … The choice between two conflicting views in the record is for the Board to decide. See Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 488 , 71 S.Ct. 456, 464 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951).

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Ronald E. Alexander and Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs

78 F.3d 1103 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 21, 1996

BROWN, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which ENGEL, J., joined. MILBURN, J. (pp.---), delivered a separate dissenting opinion. BAILEY BROWN, Circuit Judge. … Flowers v.

Krispy Kreme Doughnut Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

732 F.2d 1288 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 27, 1984

P 11,003 KRISPY KREME DOUGHNUT CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. Bakery, Confectionery and Tobacco Workers International Union, Local 213, AFL-CIO/CLC, Intervenor. … N.L.R.B., 714 F.2d 657, 660 (6th Cir.1983) (citations omitted). 8 It is normally the function of the Board to resolve factual controversy and credibility questions. N.L.R.B. v.

Bowling Green v. Martin Land Development Co., Inc.

561 F.3d 556 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 1, 2009

Brown, 915 F.2d 219, 223 (6th Cir.1990) (“A district court engages in statutory construction as a matter of law, and we review its conclusions de novo.”)). *559 III. … In Cort v.

National Labor Relations Board v. C.J.R. Transfer, Inc. And C.J. Rogers Transfer, Inc.

936 F.2d 279 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 25, 1991

We uphold the Board’s findings of fact where substantial evidence in the record supports the findings. See, e.g., NLRB v. Fry Foods, Inc., 609 F.2d 267, 271 (6th Cir.1979); NLRB v. … We also review the Board’s application of the law to the facts under the substantial evidence standard. E.g., Turnbull Cone Baking Co. v. NLRB, 778 F.2d 292, 295 (6th Cir.1985) (citing NLRB v. United Ins.

NLRB v. Intl Brotherhood

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 31, 2008

Hosp. v. NLRB, 328 F.3d 837, 844 (6th Cir. 2003)). … (quoting Ace Doran Hauling & Rigging Co. v. NLRB, 462 F.2d 190, 193 (6th Cir. 1972))). However, based on this record, we are unable to discern the factual and legal basis for the Board's determination of agency.

Coogan v. Cincinnati Bar Association

431 F.2d 1209 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 9, 1970

COOGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … Brown, Atty. Gen. of Ohio, Thomas V. Martin, Asst. Atty. Gen., Columbus, Ohio, for Supreme Court of Ohio and Thomas Startzman on motion to affirm. John S.

Itt Lighting Fixtures, Division of Itt Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

719 F.2d 851 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 6, 1983

The most important question arises from the Board’s determination that ITT violated Section 8(a)(1) of the Act as interpreted in NLRB v. … In NLRB v.

Heyward v. Wilkinson

27 F. App'x 539 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 7, 2001

City of Wyandotte v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 262 F.3d 581, 585 (6th Cir.2001). Heyward first claims that he was entitled to receive procedural due process before the Rules Infraction Board. … See Jones v. Baker, 155 F.3d 810 (6th Cir.1998); Mackey v. Dyke, 111 F.3d 460 (6th Cir.1997); Rimmer-Bey v. Brown, 62 F.3d 789 (6th Cir.1995).

National Labor Relations Board v. Harper-Grace Hospitals, Inc., Marianne Jensen, Intervenors

737 F.2d 576 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 28, 1984

Beth Israel Hospital v. NLRB, 437 U.S. 483, 507 , 98 S.Ct. 2463, 2476 , 57 L.Ed.2d 370 (1978). … NLRB v. Baptist Hospital, Inc., 442 U.S. 773, 781 , 99 S.Ct. 2598, 2603 , 61 L.Ed.2d 251 (1979); Beth Israel Hospital v. NLRB, 437 U.S. at 507 , 98 S.Ct. at 2476 .

National Labor Relations Board v. C & E Stores, Inc.

611 F.2d 654 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 20, 1979

P 12,538 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, Retail Clerks Union Local No. 1059 Retail Clerks International Union, AFL-CIO, Intervenor, v. C & E STORES, INC., C & E SUPERVALUE DIVISION, Respondent. No. 77-1563. … The Board, therefore, ordered the Company to bargain with the union without first holding an election, in accordance with NLRB v.

Christopher Alvin Grubb v. Brig. General William H. Birdsong, Jr., Commanding General, Fort Campbell, Ky.

452 F.2d 516 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 6, 1971

LaVallee, 391 U.S. 234 , 88 S.Ct. 1556 , 20 L.Ed.2d 554 (1968), and Brown v. … objector discharge. 2 In Bohnert v.

32 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1283, 32 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,782 Leonard Webb, Cross-Appellee v. County Board of Education of Dyer County, Tennessee, Cross-Appellants

715 F.2d 254 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 29, 1983

See, e.g., Patsy v. Board of Regents, 457 U.S. 496 , 102 S.Ct. 2557 , 73 L.Ed.2d 172 (1982) (§ 1983); Cannon v. … In Brown v.

Automobile Club Of Michigan v. National Labor Relations Board

631 F.2d 82 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 29, 1980

Branch Certification 5 The decision in Meijer, Inc. v. … It relies upon the findings of branch autonomy in Meijer and the decisions in Prudential Insurance Company of America v. NLRB, 529 F.2d 66 (6th Cir. 1976), Wayne Oakland Bank v.

Earl Ellery Wright v. United States Board of Parole and United States of America

557 F.2d 74 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 13, 1977

In Jacobson v. … The term Parole Commission will be used in this opinion, rather than Board of Parole, for sake of clarity.

Walton v. Michigan

115 F. App'x 786 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 23, 2004

In 2003, the Parole Board deferred his parole for one year. … Inst. v. Ohio State Adult Parole Autk, 929 F.2d 233, 235 (6th Cir.1991), and the laws of Michigan do not create a liberty interest in parole. Sweeton v. Brown, 27 F.3d 1162, 1164-65 (6th Cir.1994) (en banc).

National Labor Relations Board v. J. H. Rutter-Rex Manufacturing Co., Inc.

434 F.2d 1318 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 28, 1970

The supplemental decision and order of the Board are published at 180 N.L.R.B. No. 133. In N.L.R.B. v. J. H. Rutter Rex Mfg. … The cause was remanded to the Board for further findings with respect to the alleged violations of § 8(a) (5), in the light of N.L.R.B. v. Gissel Packing Co., 395 U.S. 575 , 89 S.Ct. 1918 , 23 L.Ed.2d 547 .

National Labor Relations Board v. Taylor Machine Products, Inc.

98 F. App'x 424 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 12, 2004

The Board adopted the administrative law judge’s findings and ordered reinstatement and backpay. We granted the Board’s application for enforcement of the relevant portion of that order. NLRB v. … Ishikawa Gasket Am., Inc. v. NLRB, 354 F.3d 534, 537 (6th Cir.2004). This statement is especially true when we review a remedial order that the Board has issued. See NLRB v.