Case law

Yha, Inc., Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner

2 F.3d 168 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 11, 1993

NLRB v. Henry Vogt Mach. … NLRB v. Norbar, Inc., 752 F.2d 235, 242 (6th Cir.1985).

Reid Lininger v. St. Marys City Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 7, 2020

Plaintiffs’ fathers wrote a letter to Brown to request an appeal. Brown brought the letter to the attention of the Board, but no additional investigation was conducted. Two months later, ODE concluded its investigation. … Marys Board of Education, Brown, Hollman, and Frye. Following discovery in each case, the district court granted summary judgment to Defendants on all claims.

Southern Foundation, a Division of Kellwood Company v. National Labor Relations Board

406 F.2d 1063 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 11, 1969

ORDER This is a petition for review and cross-petition for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board which was issued on April 18,1968 and is reported at 170 NLRB 184 . … A review of the record, including the finding of the Trial Examiner, convinces us that the factual conclusions of the Board are without support on the record, considered as a whole. Universal Camera Corp. v.

Mapp v. Board of Education of City of Chattanooga, Hamilton County, Tennessee

373 F.2d 75 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 27, 1967

Mapp, their Father and next friend et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the CITY OF CHATTANOOGA, HAMILTON COUNTY, TENNESSEE et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 16877. … Here the transfer provisions might have a racial basis, but only during a short transition period, consistent with the Board's judgment on student welfare and the Supreme Court's mandate in Brown v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Mercy-Memorial Hospital Corporation

836 F.2d 1022 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 28, 1988

Co. v. N.L.R.B., 749 F.2d 362 (6th Cir.1984). … We find the Board's decision to be supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole. Universal Camera Corp. v.

Landmark International Trucks, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

775 F.2d 148 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 18, 1985

See Landmark International Trucks, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 699 F.2d 815 (6th Cir.1983). … The Board appears never to have considered Whaley’s testimony, though in our first opinion this court disagreed with the Board that Whaley’s testimony was hearsay and considered it in reaching our decision.

Marguerite T. Tobin and Kathryn M. Tobin, an Incompetent, by Marguerite T. Tobin, Her Next Friend v. United States Railroad Retirement Board

286 F.2d 480 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 9, 1961

In Davie v. … Co., 7 Cir., 126 F.2d 76 , certiorari denied 316 U.S. 705 , 62 S.Ct. 1308 , 86 L.Ed. 1773 ; Browne v. New York Life Ins. Co., 8 Cir., 57 F.2d 62 ; In re McWilson’s Estate, 155 Ohio St. 261, 268 , 98 N.E.2d 289 .

Yellow Springs Exempted Village School District Board of Education v. Ohio High School Athletic Association, Yellow Springs Exempted Village School District Board of Education v. Ohio State Board of Education

647 F.2d 651 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 28, 1981

In Hoover v. Meiklejohn, supra, the district court distinguished Brown v. Board of Education, supra, and declared that female athletes would not suffer a stigma by being restricted to separate teams. … The Supreme Court's reasoning in Brown v.

United States v. Jay Brown

404 F. App'x 946 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 15, 2010

United States v. Johnson, 569 F.3d 619, 623 (6th Cir. 2009). -3- 09-5710 United States v. Jay Joseph Brown III. … Jay Joseph Brown Williams, 607 F.3d 1123, 1125-26 (6th Cir. 2010); United States v. Alexander, 543 F.3d 819, 825 (6th Cir. 2008); United States v. Leasure, 331 F. App’x 370, 378 (6th Cir. 2009).

Bendix-Westinghouse Automotive Air Brake Company v. National Labor Relations Board

443 F.2d 106 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 25, 1971

No. 29 (1970), the Board 6 noted its awareness of our decisions in Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. NLRB, 413 F.2d 158 (6th Cir. 1969) (denying enforcement of the Board’s order); and Motor Wheel Corp. v. … Fleetwood Trailer Co., 389 U.S. 375, 378 , 88 S.Ct. 543 , 19 L.Ed.2d 614 (1967), with NLRB v. Brown, 380 U.S. 278, 286-287 , 85 S.Ct. 980 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839 (1965), and American Shipbuilding Co. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Ace Doran Hauling and Rigging Company

458 F.2d 512 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 2, 1972

ORDER On consideration of the unfair labor practice findings of the National Labor Relations Board and its petition for enforcement of its order for reemployment and back pay; and Finding substantial evidence and appropriate … inferences from that evidence to support the findings of the Board, the order of the Board will be enforced.

Robert Eaton v. Newport Board of Education, Kentucky Education Association and William Gist

975 F.2d 292 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 9, 1992

Those made as part of the campaign to whip up public support in order to put pressure on the Board to remove Stevens are equally protected. See NAACP v. … Co. v. City of Detroit, 883 F.2d 1265, 1273 (6th Cir.1989). Second, even though a school board may sometimes act as a quasi-judicial body, that fact does not transform it into a court. Joseph v.

National Labor Relations Board v. H & H Pretzel Company

831 F.2d 650 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 19, 1987

P 10,202 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, Respondent, v. … the Board if so supported. 27 Morrison v.

Martin v. Barnsville

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 21, 2000

Upon completion of an investigation, the school board recommended that plaintiff be 6 Martin v. Barnsville Exempted Village No. 99-3263 No. 99-3263 Martin v. … Bd. of Educ. v.

Schilder v. Gusik

180 F.2d 662 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 5, 1950

Hunter, Warden, 179 F.2d 664 and Hunter v. Beets, 180 F.2d 101 . Much is made by the appellee of Hiatt v. Brown, 5 Cir., 175 F.2d 273 now reversed by the United States Supreme Court 18 L.W. 4187. … McDonald, supra, namely, Hiatt v. Birchfield, 179 F.2d 679 ; Hiatt v. Fugate, 179 F.2d 679 and Hiatt v. Jackson, 179 F.2d 680 .

Krispy Kreme Doughnut Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

732 F.2d 1288 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 27, 1984

P 11,003 KRISPY KREME DOUGHNUT CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. Bakery, Confectionery and Tobacco Workers International Union, Local 213, AFL-CIO/CLC, Intervenor. … N.L.R.B., 714 F.2d 657, 660 (6th Cir.1983) (citations omitted). 8 It is normally the function of the Board to resolve factual controversy and credibility questions. N.L.R.B. v.

Matovski v. Gonzales

492 F.3d 722 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 15, 2007

INS v. Aguirre-Aguirre, 526 U.S. 415, 424 , 119 S.Ct. 1439 , 143 L.Ed.2d 590 (1999). Finally, we may consider only those issues previously addressed by the Board. INS v. … Brown v. Ashcroft, 360 F.3d 346, 351-52 (2d Cir.2004).

Charles Adams v. Federal Express Corporation

547 F.2d 319 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 16, 1976

The memorandum opinion of Chief District Judge Bailey Brown is reported at 90 L.R. R.M. 2742. The appeal presents two questions: 1. … We would prefer to hold that the District Court has no jurisdiction and that exclusive jurisdiction is in the National Mediation Board. Compare Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks v.

Brown v. Warden, Mansfield Correctional Institution

492 F. App'x 533 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 10, 2012

11 No. 11-3238 Brown v. … 12 No. 11-3238 Brown v.

Conny Moritz v. Blaine Lafler

525 F. App'x 277 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 25, 2013

See Brown v. Smith, 551 F.3d 424, 428 n.2 (6th Cir. 2008).5 Other sister circuits have agreed. See, e.g., Gardner v. … Pinholster, see Williams v. Lafler, No. 09-2137, 2012 WL 3326301, at *3 (6th Cir. Aug. 14, 2012), nothing suggests that Brown’s ruling on waiver of the AEDPA standard of review is any less persuasive.