Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca6

10,000+ results

1.52s

  • United States v. Robert Brown

    Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 30, 2022

    Penson, 526 F.3d at 337. 4 No. 22-5010, United States v. Brown United States v. … Lee, 974 F.3d at 677. 10 No. 22-5010, United States v. Brown (R. 81, Brown Sentencing Hearing, 61).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Kessel Food Markets, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    868 F.2d 881 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 18, 1989

    See NLRB v. Sanford Home for Adults, 669 F.2d 35 (2d Cir.1981); Eisenberg v. … In NLRB v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Walter Paul Arnold v. Ronald Marshall, Supt., and William J. Brown, Attorney General, State of Ohio

    657 F.2d 83 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 5, 1981

    On appeal to this court appellant contends that Davis v. … prejudice that the State had suffered would not have been avoided if the petition had been filed earlier. 1 It is clear to us that the United States Magistrate and the District Judge considered and decided this case with Davis v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Local No. 106, Glass Bottle Blowers Ass'n

    520 F.2d 693 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 22, 1975

    In N.L.R.B. v. Allis-Chalmers Mfg. … N.L.R.B., 319 U.S. 533, 539-40 , 63 S.Ct. 1214 , 87 L.Ed. 1568 (1943); Decaturville Sportswear Co. v. N.L.R.B., 406 F.2d 886 , 888-89 (6th Cir. 1969). Enforcement is granted. Cf. Brown v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Mid America Media, Inc., Wtrx-Am v. National Labor Relations Board

    663 F.2d 17 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 20, 1981

    The Board has filed a cross-application for enforcement of its order. … NLRB v. Tennessee Packers, Inc., 379 F.2d 172 (6th Cir.), cert, denied, 389 U.S. 958 , 88 S.Ct. 338 , 19 L.Ed.2d 364 (1967).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 175 v. National Labor Relations Board

    760 F.2d 714 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 2, 1985

    Krispy Kreme Doughnut Corporation v. N.L.R.B., 732 F.2d 1288 (6th Cir.1984). The situation referred to in N.L. R.B. v. Norbar, Inc., 752 F.2d 235 (6th Cir.1985), did not occur in these proceedings. … We conclude that the Board properly found this case to be controlled by Sachs Electric Company, 248 NLRB 699 (1980), enforced in relevant part, NLRB v. IBEW, Local 453, 668 F.2d 991 (8th Cir.1982).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Catherine Mcauley Health Center

    885 F.2d 341 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 20, 1989

    Co. v. NLRB, 529 F.2d 66, 67 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 975 , 96 S.Ct. 2176 , 48 L.Ed.2d 799 (1976); Wayne Oakland Bank v. … Lukes Medical Center v. NLRB, 653 F.2d 450, 454 (10th Cir.1981). See also Meijer, Inc. v. NLRB, 564 F.2d 737, 740 (6th Cir.1977).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.

    489 F.2d 525 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 27, 1973

    Railroad Retirement Board, 227 F.2d 684, 686 , C.A. 7th. ( 304 F.2d at 428, 429 ) Additionally, in Kington v. … In Williams v.

    Cited 41 timesPublished
  • Lincoln Bearing Company and Lincoln Bearing Surplus Company v. National Labor Relations Board

    311 F.2d 48 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 26, 1962

    B. v. Roberts Brothers, 225 F.2d 58, 60 , C.A.9. In N. L. R. B. v. … Consolidated Edison Co., et al. v. National Labor Relations Board et al., 305 U.S. 197, 229 , 59 S.Ct. 206, 217 , 83 L.Ed. 126 . In Universal Camera Corp. v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • United States v. Cedric Lamar Brown

    Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 23, 2024

    As Fletcher later testified, when he approached Brown’s car and Brown lowered the No. 23-5983, United States v. Brown window, Fletcher “detected the odor of raw marijuana from the car.” … Brown contains evidence of a crime. California v. Acevedo, 500 U.S. 565, 580 (1991); United States v. Graham, 275 F.3d 490, 509–10 (6th Cir. 2001).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Reid Lininger v. St. Marys City Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ.

    Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 7, 2020

    Plaintiffs’ fathers wrote a letter to Brown to request an appeal. Brown brought the letter to the attention of the Board, but no additional investigation was conducted. Two months later, ODE concluded its investigation. … Marys Board of Education, Brown, Hollman, and Frye. Following discovery in each case, the district court granted summary judgment to Defendants on all claims.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Reid Lininger v. St. Marys City Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ.

    Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 7, 2020

    Plaintiffs’ fathers wrote a letter to Brown to request an appeal. Brown brought the letter to the attention of the Board, but no additional investigation was conducted. Two months later, ODE concluded its investigation. … Marys Board of Education, Brown, Hollman, and Frye. Following discovery in each case, the district court granted summary judgment to Defendants on all claims.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Evans-Marshall v. Board of Education of the Tipp City Exempted Village School District

    624 F.3d 332 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 21, 2010

    At its March 2002 meeting, the school board voted unanimously not to renew Evans-Marshall’s contract. She requested an explanation, and the school board sent her No. 09-3775 Evans-Marshall v. … Mayer v. Monroe County Cmty. Sch. Corp., 474 F.3d 477, 479 (7th Cir. 2007). And if it is the school board that hires that speech, it can surely “regulate the content of what is or is not expressed,” Rosenberger v.

    Cited 73 timesPublished
  • Mapp v. Board of Education of City of Chattanooga, Hamilton County, Tennessee

    373 F.2d 75 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 27, 1967

    Mapp, their Father and next friend et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the CITY OF CHATTANOOGA, HAMILTON COUNTY, TENNESSEE et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 16877. … Here the transfer provisions might have a racial basis, but only during a short transition period, consistent with the Board's judgment on student welfare and the Supreme Court's mandate in Brown v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Murray Ohio Manufacturing Company, Lawrenceburg, Tennessee Division

    279 F.2d 686 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 7, 1960

    The National Labor Relations Board having on March 11, 1960, petitioned this Court for enforcement of its order of February 6, 1959, directed against the above named Respondent, its officers, agents, successors and assigns … , Murray Ohio Manufacturing Co., Lawrenceburg, Tennessee, Division, its officers, agents, successors and assigns, abide by and perform the directions of the Board in said order contained.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Virginia M. Kirsch v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

    337 F.2d 409 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 16, 1964

    The motion of the petitioners for a stay of the order of the Board is denied. Hamlin Testing Laboratories, Inc. v. … Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 312 F.2d 392 (C.A.10); Associated Securities Corporation v. Securities and Exchange Commission, 283 F.2d 773 (C.A.10).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Pepsi Cola Bottling Company of Mansfield, Ohio

    455 F.2d 1134 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 14, 1972

    See, also, NLRB v. … conflicting views. 3 Under NLRB v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Mercy-Memorial Hospital Corporation

    836 F.2d 1022 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 28, 1988

    Co. v. N.L.R.B., 749 F.2d 362 (6th Cir.1984). … We find the Board's decision to be supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole. Universal Camera Corp. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Landmark International Trucks, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    775 F.2d 148 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 18, 1985

    See Landmark International Trucks, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 699 F.2d 815 (6th Cir.1983). … The Board appears never to have considered Whaley’s testimony, though in our first opinion this court disagreed with the Board that Whaley’s testimony was hearsay and considered it in reaching our decision.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Myca Products Division of the Kane Company

    352 F.2d 511 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 12, 1965

    The Board upheld the election and found that MYCA violated Section 8(a) (5) and (1) of the Act 1 by refusing to bargain with the union. … The Board considered all of the evidence carefully, some of which was hearsay. There was no evidence that any threats were inspired by the union.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.