Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca6

10,000+ results

1.73s

  • Rathbun v. Warren City Schools

    825 F.2d 977 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 30, 1987

    See, e.g., Roadway Express, supra, 447 U.S. at 765-67 , 100 S.Ct. at 2463 -65 (citing Browning Debenture Holders’ Committee v. DASA Corp., 560 F.2d 1078, 1088 (2d Cir.1977)). … See Lewis v. Brown & Root, Inc., 722 F.2d 209 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1231 , 104 S.Ct. 2690 , 81 L.Ed.2d 884 (1984).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Northcross (Deborah A.) v. Board of Education of Memphis City Schools

    722 F.2d 742 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 3, 1983

    722 F.2d 742 Northcross (Deborah A.) v. Board of Education of Memphis City Schools NO. 82-5302 United States Court of Appeals, sixth Circuit. OCT 03, 1983 1 Appeal From: W.D.Tenn. 2 AFFIRMED.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mechanic's Building and Loan Association v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board

    571 F.2d 582 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 4, 1978

    571 F.2d 582 Mechanic's Building and Loan Association v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board No. 76-1886 United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit 1/4/78 S.D.Ohio AFFIRMED

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • The Firestone Tire and Rubber Company v. National Labor Relations Board

    533 F.2d 336 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 15, 1976

    ORDER Upon consideration of Firestone’s petition for review and the Board’s cross-application for enforcement, we are of the opinion that the Board erred in denying Firestone an evidentiary hearing on its objections to the … It is therefore ORDERED that the Board’s order be vacated and the cause remanded to the Board for an evidentiary hearing on said issue.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bromwell Brush & Wire Goods Co. v. State Board of Charities & Corrections

    288 F. 1018 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 17, 1923

    It appearing to the satisfaction of this court that the state board of control of the commonwealth of Kentucky had no power to make the contract for whose asserted breach this action was brought, and that the District Court … without consideration of the other presented defenses to the action, but without prejudice to such other remedy, if any, as plaintiff may have with respect to the warehouse erected by plaintiff upon the premises of the state board

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Josephine Goss v. The Board of Education of the City of Knoxville, Tennessee

    482 F.2d 1044 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 18, 1973

    See Goss v. Board of Education, 340 F.Supp. 711 (E.D. Tenn.1972). When it was last before this Court, the case was remanded “for further proceedings consistent with Swann v. … Goss v. Board of Education, 444 F.2d 632, 640 (6th Cir. 1971).

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • The E.W. Buschman Company, Cross v. The National Labor Relations Board, Cross

    820 F.2d 206 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 5, 1987

    In NLRB v. St. Joseph’s Hospital, 755 F.2d 260 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, sub. nom. New York State Nurses Ass’n v. St. … It also cited Shell Oil Co. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Akron Standard Division of Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. Raymond Donovan, Secretary of U.S. Department of Labor

    780 F.2d 568 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 8, 1986

    Radowich v. United States Attorney, supra; Brown v. F.B.I., supra; Kiraly v. F.B.I., supra. … See Brown v. F.B.I., 658 F.2d at 75 . .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • William Dwight Dotson v. Reginald A. Wilkinson, Director John Kinkela and Margarette T. Ghee

    300 F.3d 661 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 12, 2002

    Brown v. Bargery, 207 F.3d 863, 867 (6th Cir.2000); McGore, 114 F.3d at 604 . … Brown, 207 F.3d at 867 . Furthermore, we read pro se complaints liberally. Thaddeus-X v. Blatter, 175 F.3d 378 , 384 n. 2 (6th Cir.1999) (en banc).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Board of Councilmen of City of Frankfort v. Deposit Bank of Frankfort

    127 F. 812 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 18, 1904

    New Orleans v. Steamship Company, 20 Wall. 387 , 22 L. Ed. 354 ; Ex parte Chetwood, 165 U. S. 443 , 17 Sup. Ct. 385, 41 L. Ed. 782 ; Tinsley v. Anderson, 171 U. S. 105 , 18 Sup. Ct. 805, 43 L. Ed. 91 ; Sessions v. … Muhlenberg Co. v. Dyer, 13 C. C. A. 64 , 65 Fed. 634 ; United States v. Diamond Match Co., 53 C. C. A. 90, 115 . Fed. 288; Village of Mackinaw City v. United States, 56 C. C.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Saunders v. Williams

    89 F. App'x 923 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 10, 2003

    Williams, Retired Ohio Parole Board Chairperson Margarette T. Ghee, Director of Sex Offender Services David Berenson, Ohio Parole Board Chief Hearing Officer Walter A. Hoff, Medical Services Administrator Elenor M. … Brown v. Bargery, 207 F.3d 863, 867 (6th Cir.2000).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Interstate 65 Corporation D/B/A Continental Inn

    453 F.2d 269 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 30, 1971

    It therefore is incumbent upon us to determine whether the above findings of the Board are supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. N.L.R.B. v. … R.B. v.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Health Care & Retirement Corp. of America v. National Labor Relations Board

    255 F.3d 276 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 3, 2000

    Co. v. NLRB, 890 F.2d 804, 808 (6th Cir.1989). Moreover, “it is the Board’s function to resolve questions of fact and credibility when there is a conflict in the testimony.” NLRB v. … It is the Board’s function to resolve questions of fact and credibility when there is a conflict in the testimony. See Adair Standish Corp. v. NLRB, 912 F.2d 854, 860 (6th Cir.1990); NLRB v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hyatt Corporation, Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner

    939 F.2d 361 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 22, 1991

    In NLRB v. … Co. v.

    Cited 70 timesPublished
  • Mona Bronson v. Board of Education of the City School District of Cincinnati, Its Members, Etal.

    525 F.2d 344 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 30, 1975

    Carter was counsel for the appellant Brown before the Supreme Court of the United States in Brown v. The Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954). Mr. … It was the law of this country for more than a half century until it was overturned in Brown v. Board of Educ., 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954).

    Cited 60 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Valley Plaza, Inc., D/B/A Captain Nemo's

    715 F.2d 237 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 12, 1983

    NLRB v. Tennessee Packers, Inc., 344 F.2d 948, 949 (6th Cir.1965); Dreis and Krump Manufacturing Co. v. … and Tool Co. v.

    Cited 45 timesPublished
  • Diamond Electronics Division of Arvin Systems, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    570 F.2d 156 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 13, 1978

    ORDER The employer has petitioned this court to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board in which the Board found that the employer had violated Section 8(a)(5) and (1) of the Act by refusing to … The Board has cross applied for enforcement of its order which is reported at 225 NLRB No. 27 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Henry Ford Health System (95-6173) v. National Labor Relations Board

    105 F.3d 1139 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 4, 1997

    The Board has the primary responsibility for developing and applying national labor policy, and we therefore accord Board rules considerable deference. See NLRB v. … policy,” NLRB v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • United Transportation Union v. Cuyahoga Valley Railway Company

    979 F.2d 431 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 10, 1992

    *433 BAILEY BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge. … A Public Law Board, however, as stated, does not have jurisdiction over a challenge to the validity of a collective bargaining agreement. Brotherhood of Railway Trainmen v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Consolidated Television Cable Service, Inc. v. The City Of Frankfort

    857 F.2d 354 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 21, 1988

    We agree. 34 The state action immunity doctrine was established in 1943 in Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943). … There is authority from a United States district court in Kentucky that awarding an exclusive franchise to a CATV operator falls within the " 'state action' exemption ... created in Parker v. Brown."

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.