Case law

National Labor Relations Board v. Smitty's Meat Market, Inc.

38 F.3d 1216 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 18, 1994

Under these circumstances, we conclude the Board is entitled to the relief sought. See NLRB v. … Board); NLRB v.

Wendy E. Webb v. Thomas T. McCullough

828 F.2d 1151 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 17, 1987

See Davidson v. Cannon, 474 U.S. 344 , 106 S.Ct. 668 , 88 L.Ed.2d 677 (1986); Daniels v. Williams, 474 U.S. 327 , 106 S.Ct. 662 , 88 L.Ed.2d 662 (1986); Ingraham v. … As the Supreme Court stated in Daniels v.

Fivecap, Inc., Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner

294 F.3d 768 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 28, 2002

See NLRB v. … Corp. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Company, Inc. Of Delaware

651 F.2d 442 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 10, 1981

The National Labor Relations Board (the Board) petitions for enforcement of its order that the Lloyd A. … In Wright Line, 251 NLRB No. 150 (1980), the Board has reexamined its use of the “in part” test in light of the decision in Mt. Healthy Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274, 97 S.Ct. 568 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1979).

National Labor Relations Board v. McCready and Sons, Inc., and Melco Construction, Inc.

482 F.2d 872 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 29, 1973

N.L.R.B. v. Strong, 386 F.2d 929, 931 (9th Cir. 1968). In contrast, the First Circuit, in N.L.R.B. v. … See N.L.R.B. v. Pennwoven, supra at 525 . Enforcement of the Order of the Board is denied. 1 . In Melco’s case, it is stipulated that the August 3 refusal was unequivocal.

Gamble Enterprises, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

202 F.2d 954 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 10, 1953

It is now ordered that our judgment and order are set aside and held for nought and the cause is remanded to the National Labor Relations Board for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion and mandate of the

Richard Brown v. International Brotherhood Of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 58 Afl-Cio

936 F.2d 251 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 7, 1991

See Sako v. … Only Brown, therefore, has appealed to this Court. Minority Employees v. Tennessee Dep't of Employment, 901 F.2d 1327 (6th Cir.1990) (en banc) 1 Beyond what is necessary. Mayo v.

Stephanie Ann Brown v. The County of Genesee, Michigan Council 25, Afscme Afl-Cio, Local 2259

872 F.2d 169 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 11, 1989

Brown v. County of Genesee, 37 F.E.P. Cases 1595 (E.D.Mich.1985). … Prior to approval of the settlement agreement by the Genesee County Board of Commissioners, Mr.

Steve Lucsik v. Board of Education of the Brunswick City School District

621 F.2d 841 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 22, 1980

See Adolph Coors Co. v. A & S Wholesalers, Inc., 561 F.2d 807, 813 (10th Cir. 1977); Buddy-Systems, Inc. v. … Normally, school board members are liable for deprivations of constitutional rights that are motivated by bad faith. Wood v. Strickland, 420 U.S. 308, 322 , 95 S.Ct. 992, 1001 , 43 L.Ed.2d 214 (1975).

William Dwight Dotson v. Reginald A. Wilkinson, Director John Kinkela and Margarette T. Ghee

300 F.3d 661 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 12, 2002

Brown v. Bargery, 207 F.3d 863, 867 (6th Cir.2000); McGore, 114 F.3d at 604 . … Brown, 207 F.3d at 867 . Furthermore, we read pro se complaints liberally. Thaddeus-X v. Blatter, 175 F.3d 378 , 384 n. 2 (6th Cir.1999) (en banc).

Newspaper Drivers & Handlers Local Union No. 372 v. National Labor Relations Board

682 F.2d 116 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 29, 1982

On review by the Board and by a divided two-to-one vote, the Board found, contrary to its long-standing previous policy, (see Newsday, Inc. 171 N.L.R.B. 1456 (1968)) that newspaper carriers were employees and hence that the … The logic of this reversal appears to be entirely related to a change in composition of the Board, since the following facts relied upon by the Board in its decision were all available at the time of the News-day decision

Thompson v. Veterans Administration

20 F. App'x 367 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 20, 2001

Later, Thompson brought a motion for reconsideration and the Board of Veterans Appeals (“BVA”) denied the motion. … See Beamon v. Brown, 125 F.3d 965, 970-71 (6th Cir. 1997); Zuspann v. Brown, 60 F.3d 1156, 1158 (5th Cir.1995). Therefore, Thompson’s complaint was properly dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

Northcross (Deborah A.) v. Board of Education of Memphis City Schools

722 F.2d 742 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 3, 1983

722 F.2d 742 Northcross (Deborah A.) v. Board of Education of Memphis City Schools NO. 82-5302 United States Court of Appeals, sixth Circuit. OCT 03, 1983 1 Appeal From: W.D.Tenn. 2 AFFIRMED.

National Labor Relations Board v. Master Slack and/or Master Trousers Corp.

773 F.2d 77 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 17, 1985

This court enforced the Board’s order. See NLRB v. Master Slack, 618 F.2d 6 (6th Cir.1980). … Shore, 439 U.S. 322 , 326 and n. 5, 99 S.Ct. 645 , 649 and n. 5, 58 L.Ed.2d 552 (1979); Marlene Industries Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 712 F.2d 1011, 1015-16 (6th Cir.1983); United States v.

Tooson v. Roadway Express, Inc.

47 F. App'x 370 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 25, 2002

See, e.g., Ercegovich v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 154 F.3d 344, 355 (6th Cir.1998). Tooson contends that the Supreme Court held in Price Waterhouse v. … Tooson also argues that Brown was so clearly a decisionmaker that the instruction simply confused the jury.

Jim Causley Pontiac, Division Jim Causley, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

675 F.2d 125 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 15, 1982

For the reasons stated herein, we again deny enforcement of the Board’s order and remand the case to the Board for still further proceedings. The facts are set forth in our earlier decision, Jim Causley Pontiac v. … While it is true that the Board can find knowledge by inference, it is impossible to decipher if that is in fact what the Board did here. See, e.g., A to Z Portion Meats, Inc. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. J. H. Rutter Rex Manufacturing Co., Inc.

415 F.2d 1133 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 19, 1969

However, the Board’s determination that the company violated Section 8(a) (5) by unlawfully refusing to bargain with the union was made prior to the Supreme Court’s decision in N.L.R.B. v. … This is consistent with the Supreme Court’s action in Thrift Drug Co. v. N.L.R.B., 395 U.S. 828 , 89 S.Ct. 2125 , 23 L.Ed.2d 737 (1969), and Lou DeYoung’s Market Basket, Inc. v.

United States v. Daniel Brown, III

593 F. App'x 444 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 14, 2014

We review the sentence for reasonableness under -2- Case No. 14-3257 United States v. Brown an abuse-of-discretion standard. United States v. … United States v. Ely, 468 F.3d 399, 404 (6th Cir. 2006). Finally, Brown maintains that his prior conviction for misdemeanor assault failed to support the variance.

Zemke v. Larsen

434 F.2d 1281 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 1, 1970

Browning, Jr., U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellees. Before MERRILL, KOELSCH and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges. … We recognize that these contentions may raise substantial issues, see Hand v. Laird, 3 SSLR 3298 (N.D.Cal.1970); Shirer v. Hackel, 3 SSLR 3211 (N.D.Cal. 1970); Rabbito v. Larson, 3 SSLR 3211 (N.D.Cal.1970); Gresham v.

Leo Brown v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (Uaw)

689 F.2d 69 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 16, 1982

Thropp v. Bache Halsey Stuart Shields, Inc., 650 F.2d 817, 818 (6th Cir. 1981); Thompson v. … Alexander v. Youngstown Board of Ed., 675 F.2d 787 , 795-96 (6th Cir. 1982).