Case law

Firestone Textiles Company v. National Labor Relations Board

568 F.2d 499 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 28, 1977

P 10,565 FIRESTONE TEXTILES COMPANY, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, UAW, Intervenor. … The Board affirmed, Member Kennedy dissenting.

Catherine Balsley v. LFP, Inc.

691 F.3d 747 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 16, 2012

LFP Page 2 husband Richard Brown in their action for direct copyright infringement, filed under 17 U.S.C. §§ 101 et seq. … Rick Brown, you put in concrete.” People of modest means who have stood up here and said we’re not going to let them do that.

Franklin County Distilling Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

125 F.2d 800 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 12, 1942

Brown v. Helvering, 291 U.S. 193, 199 , 54 S.Ct. 356 , 78 L.Ed. 725 . Compare American National Company v. United States, 274 U.S. 99 , 47 S.Ct. 520, 71 . L.Ed. 946; United States v. … See Spring City Foundry Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, supra; Brown v. Helvering, supra; Continental Tie, etc., Co., v. United States, supra; Elmwood Corporation v.

Bradley v. Milliken

540 F.2d 229 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 4, 1976

County School Board, 391 U.S. 430 , 88 S.Ct. 1689 , 20 L.Ed.2d 716 (1968) and Brown v. Board of Education, 349 U.S. 294 , 75 S.Ct. 753 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 (1955). Initially he contemplated a "Detroit only" solution. … Specifically it involves actions by the Governor and Legislature of Arkansas upon the premise that they are not bound by our holding in Brown v.

Charles v. Baesler

910 F.2d 1349 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 14, 1990

See Blum v. Bacon, 457 U.S. 132 , 137 n. 5, 102 S.Ct. 2355 , 2359 n. 5, 72 L.Ed.2d 728 (1982); Brown v. St. Louis Police Department of the City of St. … See Gutzwiller v. Fenik, 860 F.2d 1317, 1328-29 (6th Cir.1988); Ramsey v. Board of Education of Whitley County, Kentucky, 844 F.2d at 1275 (Edwards, J., dissenting).

Oakland County Board of Commissioners v. United States Department of Labor

926 F.2d 580 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 28, 1991

In Tennessee Dept, of Employment Security v. … Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co., 486 U.S. 196, 203 , 108 S.Ct. 1717, 1722 , 100 L.Ed.2d 178 (1988); Baker v. Raulie, 879 F.2d 1396, 1398 (6th Cir.1989) (per curiam).

BE & K Construction Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

51 F. App'x 571 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 21, 2002

Supreme Court for further proceedings in conformity with its decision in BE & K Construction Company v. National Labor Relations Board, et al., — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 2390 , 153 L.Ed.2d 499 , 70 USLW 4647 (June 24, 2002). … Upon further consideration, it is the conclusion of this court that the matter be remanded to the National Labor Relations Board for its determination of the following issues: (1) Whether BE & K had a subjectively genuine

Jolena Brown v. FCA US LLC

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 17, 2025

No. 25-1405, Jolena Brown v. … Niswander v. Cincinnati Ins., 529 F.3d 714, 719-20 (6th Cir. 2008). Internal advocacy 13 No. 25-1405, Jolena Brown v.

Peggy Brown v. United States

355 F. App'x 901 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 8, 2009

Seavers v. Methodist Med. Ctr. of Oak Ridge, 9 S.W.3d 86, 93 (Tenn.1999); Byrd v. Hall, 847 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tenn.1993); Blocker v. Regional Med. Ctr. at Memphis, 722 S.W.2d 660, 661 (Tenn.1987); Hessmer v. … Allen v.

The Bartley Company v. National Labor Relations Board

410 F.2d 517 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 9, 1969

Again I express my disagreement with this court’s assumption of the fact-finding responsibilities of the National Labor Relations Board. See, e. g., G.P.D., Inc. v. … NLRB, 341 F.2d 756 (6th Cir. 1965); NLRB v. United Papermakers & Paperworkers, 397 F.2d 153 (6th Cir. 1968); Morse Instrument Co. v. NLRB, 388 F.2d 1 (6th Cir. 1967); NLRB v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Nelson Manufacturing Company

408 F.2d 685 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 16, 1969

(BNA) 2047 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. NELSON MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Respondent. No. 18790. United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit. April 16, 1969. … ORDER 1 This case is before the Court upon the petition of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order which, together with the Board's decision, is reported at 167 NLRB No. 14 .

National Labor Relations Board v. Brandenburg Telephone Company

408 F.2d 377 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 12, 1969

Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 . … , nor will this order foreclose the adoption by the Board of an appropriate supplemental order.

Metropolitan Board of Public Education, Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County v. Joel Guest, by and Through His Parents, Sara and Bob Guest Sara Guest Bob Guest

193 F.3d 457 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 4, 1999

193 F.3d 457 (6th Cir. 1999) Metropolitan Board of Public Education, Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. … First, Metro Board officials failed to consider the report of an expert, Dr. Brown, in devising the IEP proposed for the 1996-1997 school year. JA at 46.

The Firestone Tire & Rubber Company v. The National Labor Relations Board

651 F.2d 1172 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 6, 1980

ORDER This matter is before the court on cross-petitions for review and enforcement respectively of a decision and order of the National Labor Relations Board issued September 29, 1978, and reported at 238 NLRB No. 168 . … Upon consideration, IT IS ORDERED that the order of the National Labor Relations Board is enforced.

Allied Mechanical Services, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

113 F.3d 623 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 9, 1997

NLRB v. Brown-Graves Lumber Co., 949 F.2d 194, 196 (6th Cir.1991) (citation omitted). We review questions of law de novo. NLRB v. C.J.R. … Co. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Local 5881, United Mine Workers of America

323 F.2d 853 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 23, 1963

This cause is before the Court upon petition of the National Labor Relations Board for an order holding respondents, United Mine Workers of America, Local 5881, Walden Shrum, James Fults and Ambrose Magouirk, guilty of civil

National Labor Relations Board v. Digital Paging System of Toledo, Inc.

659 F.2d 725 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 17, 1981

The standard of review in Board cases is whether the Board’s determination is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. 29 U.S.C. § 160 (e); Universal Camera Corp. v. … We find substantial evidence in the record to support the Board’s findings of the unfair labor practices listed above. We also find the Board properly applied the guidelines of NLRB v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Keller Ford, Inc.

69 F. App'x 672 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 24, 2003

CONSENT JUDGMENT This cause was submitted upon the application of the National Labor Relations Board (the “Board”) for the enforcement of a certain order on consent issued by the Board against the respondent, Keller Ford, … See NLRB v. Edgar Spring, Inc., 800 F.2d 595, 598 (6th Cir.1986) (per curiam). It therefore is .ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Board’s order be, and the same is hereby enforced.

National Labor Relations Board v. Hooker Chemical Corporation

475 F.2d 749 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 15, 1973

Examiner’s decision were filed with the Board. … The Board’s order was modified subsequent to the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Chemical Workers v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Lardner Elevator Company

474 F.2d 1396 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 5, 1973

Reference is made to the Board’s decision and order, reported at 197 NLRB No. 145 , for a detailed recitation of the facts. … We find that the decision of the Board is supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole. Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951).