Case law

National Labor Relations Board v. Interurban Gas Corporation, Robert M. Hemphill

401 F.2d 745 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 3, 1968

Hemphill in civil contempt of this court and directing that said three respondents purge themselves of said contempt on or before July 1, 1968, by pay *746 ing to the National Labor Relations Board the amounts now due on … Hemphill shall have complied with said adjudication and decrees to the extent of paying the total amount now due on said back-pay awards amounting to $16,221.23 as of July 1, 1968, or such part thereof as the Board may accept

National Labor Relations Board v. Ohio Masonic Home

620 F.2d 138 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 15, 1980

The Board is vested with wide discretion in establishing the procedure and safeguards necessary to ensure the fair and free choice of bargaining representatives by employees. See N. L. R. B. v. A. J. … The order of the Board shall be enforced. CELEBREZZE, Circuit Judge, would deny enforcement.

Schlabach Coal Company v. National Labor Relations Board

611 F.2d 1161 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 14, 1979

This claim is precluded by NLRB v. Gissel Packing Co., 395 U.S. 575, 618-19 , 89 S.Ct. 1918 , 23 L.Ed.2d 547 (1969). The company also claims that Mr. Mills was fired for a number of valid reasons. … Suffice it to say that the record supports the Board’s conclusion that the reasons given were pretextual. The Board’s order is enforced.

Billy Lamon Blackburn v. Fisk University

443 F.2d 121 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 28, 1971

See, Browns v. Mitchell, supra; Grossner v. Trustees of Columbia University, supra. Our decision in Brown v. Strickler, 422 F.2d 1000 (6th Cir.), is not controlling in the present case. … See, Browns v. Mitchell, supra, 409 F.2d 593 .

National Labor Relations Board v. Streamway Division of the Scott & Fetzer Company

691 F.2d 288 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 5, 1982

Co. v. … Lane Drug Company v. NLRB, 391 F.2d 812 (6th Cir. 1968). As Judge Phillips observed in NLRB v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Triangle Electric Co.

78 F. App'x 469 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 14, 2003

FiveCAP, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 294 F.3d 768, 776 (6th Cir.2002). … Vemco, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 79 F.3d 526, 530 (6th Cir.1996). GM challenges the Board’s finding that it knew that Darrah’s newspaper sales were performed as part of a concerted activity.

Echlin v. Boland

111 F. App'x 415 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 17, 2004

Brown, 27 F.3d 1162, 1164-65 (6th Cir.1994). Because there was no constitutional violation, Echlin could not sue the defendants for money damages for their parts in denying him parole. … For the same reason, Echlin could not bring a § 1983 action to challenge the information considered by the parole board. See Greenholtz, 442 U.S. at 7 , 99 S.Ct. 2100 ; Orellana v.

Robbins & Myers, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

577 F.2d 382 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 20, 1978

P 10,664 ROBBINS & MYERS, INC., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. No. 76-2444. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. June 20, 1978. Frank H. Stewart, Patrick M. … Co., 372 F.2d 203, 206 (6th Cir. 1967); NLRB v. Cleveland Trust Co., 214 F.2d 95, 98-99 (6th Cir. 1954); Federal-Mogul Corp. v. NLRB, 566 F.2d 1245, 1255-57 (5th Cir. 1978); NLRB v.

National Labor Relations Board v. American Federation of Television & Radio Artists

285 F.2d 902 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 19, 1961

The production of such statements, at the time of the hearing, before the Trial Examiner, was prohibited by regulation of the Board. Subsequently the Board reversed its position, and following N. L. R. B. v. … Adhesive Products Corp., 2 Cir., 258 F.2d 403 , held that the principle announced in Jeneks v. United States, 353 U.S. 657 , 77 S.Ct. 1007 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1103 , was applicable to Board proceedings. App. 29 U.S.C.A.

Father & Sons Lumber & Building Supplies, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

931 F.2d 1093 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 1, 1991

We apply the “abuse of discretion” standard of review to claims that the Board erred in finding no “good cause” for accepting an untimely answer to a Board-issued specification. Cf. Livingston Powdered Metal, Inc. v. … NLRB v. Dane County Dairy, 795 F.2d 1313, 1320 (7th Cir.1986) (citation omitted). A.

Charles v. Baesler

910 F.2d 1349 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 14, 1990

See Blum v. Bacon, 457 U.S. 132 , 137 n. 5, 102 S.Ct. 2355 , 2359 n. 5, 72 L.Ed.2d 728 (1982); Brown v. St. Louis Police Department of the City of St. … See Gutzwiller v. Fenik, 860 F.2d 1317, 1328-29 (6th Cir.1988); Ramsey v. Board of Education of Whitley County, Kentucky, 844 F.2d at 1275 (Edwards, J., dissenting).

Father & Sons Lumber And Building Supplies, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

931 F.2d 1093 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 1, 1991

Livingston Powdered Metal, Inc. v. NLRB, 669 F.2d 133, 137 (3d Cir.1982); NLRB v. Zeno Table Co., Inc., 610 F.2d 567, 568-69 (9th Cir.1979). … NLRB v. Dane County Dairy, 795 F.2d 1313, 1320 (7th Cir.1986) (citation omitted).

National Labor Relations Board v. Iron City Sash & Door Company of Johnstown

352 F.2d 437 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 10, 1965

This record reviewed as a whole convinces us that there was substantial evidence to support the findings of fact and the inferences drawn therefrom by the Trial Examiner and the Board. N. L. R. B. v. … Putnam Tool Company, supra; Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951). Enforcement of the Board’s order is granted. 1 .

Forrest Zayne Brown, Stephen Michael Richmond, Christopher Michael Croft, and Tony Lynn Meadows v. Alan Bargery

207 F.3d 863 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 27, 2000

See Sistrunk v. … See, e.g., McGore v.

National Labor Relations Board v. The Millgard Corporation

472 F.2d 166 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 18, 1972

Reference is made to the reported decision of the Board for a statement of pertinent facts. … Upon consideration, the court finds that the decision of the Board is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 340 U.S. 474 , 7 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 .

Delco Air Conditioning Division, General Motors Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

649 F.2d 390 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 13, 1981

Truck Lines, Inc. v. … However, the court concludes that this finding of fact by the Board is not supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole. Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R.

Raymond G. Varga Kathryn M. Varga v. Rockwell International Corporation

242 F.3d 693 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 5, 2001

The Rockwell Board of Directors insisted that HVS’ performance be turned around or the division would be sold or shut down. … According to Westwood Chemical, Inc. v.

United States v. Adams

86 F.2d 1016 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 13, 1936

Brown, became totally and permanently disabled during the life of the policy sued on, and it further appearing that there is no reversible error in the record, It is ordered that the judgment be, and it is hereby, affirmed

National Labor Relations Board v. Ruby Concrete Company

519 F.2d 1375 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 12, 1975

The court further concludes that it was within the discretion of the Board to order the respondent to bargain with the union under the facts of this case. National Labor Relations Board v. … The order of the Board is enforced.

National Labor Relations Board v. Canton Sign Company

457 F.2d 832 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 30, 1972

Brown, Jr., Howard C. Hay, Attys., N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., on brief, for petitioner. Roy E. Browne, Akron, Ohio, Hershey, Browne, Wilson, Steel, Cook & Wolfe, Akron, Ohio, on brief, for respondent. Lawrence M. … Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 321 U.S. 702 , 64 S.Ct. 817 , 88 L.Ed. 1020 ; National Labor Relations Board v. P. Lorillard Co., 314 U.S. 512 , 62 S.Ct. 397 , 86 L.Ed. 380 ; National Labor Relations Board v.