Case law

The John Klann Moving and Trucking Company v. National Labor Relations Board

411 F.2d 261 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 9, 1969

N.L.R.B. v. Challenge-Cook Bros., 374 F.2d 147 (6th Cir. 1967). It is equally clear that the Board is not bound by the decision of the grievance committee. … Carey v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp., 375 U.S. 261 , 84 S.Ct. 401 , 11 L.Ed.2d 320 (1964); N.L.R.B. v. Auburn Rubber Co., 384 F.2d 1 (10th Cir. 1967); Ramsey v.

Firestone Textiles Company v. National Labor Relations Board

568 F.2d 499 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 28, 1977

P 10,565 FIRESTONE TEXTILES COMPANY, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, UAW, Intervenor. … The Board affirmed, Member Kennedy dissenting.

Gerard W. McCall v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company

844 F.2d 294 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 24, 1988

In Andrews v. … The two types of preemption not involved in this case are Brown preemption and Machinists preemption. Brown preemption, see Brown v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Industry Products Company

673 F.2d 164 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 22, 1982

The court also concludes that the Board did not abuse its discretion in ordering the respondent to recognize and bargain with the union. N. L. R. B. v. … The order of the Board is enforced.

Cordrey v. Euckert

917 F.2d 1460 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 5, 1990

Denton, 895 F.2d 973 , 982 (4th Cir.1990) (minor procedural faults of school board were insignificant since they did not cause the child to lose educational opportunity); compare with Spielberg v. … Rowley v. Board of Education, 483 F.Supp. 528, 534 (S.D.N.Y.1980)[, aff'd, 632 F.2d 945 (2d Cir.1980), rev’d, 458 U.S. 176 [ 102 S.Ct. 3034 , 73 L.Ed.2d 690 ] (1982)].

Tocco Division of Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

702 F.2d 624 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 15, 1983

Since the former claim was not raised before the Board and since Tocco could have presented the issue at that time, we consider only the latter argument. Detroit Edison Co. v. … Both this court and the Board have previously held that a waiver of section 8(a)(5) rights must be “clear and unmistakable.” NLRB v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Service Garage, Inc.

668 F.2d 247 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 5, 1982

The Board’s order is reported at 247 NLRB No. 115 (1980). … See Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 340 U.S. 474, 496 , 71 S.Ct. 456, 468-69 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951). The Board failed to show sensitivity to the problem faced by an employer after Colonial Haven.

National Labor Relations Board v. Mrs. Weaver's Salads, a Division of Dean Foods, Co., Inc.

439 F.2d 1116 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 22, 1971

A similar issue was before this Court in N.L.R.B. v. … Brown Lumber Co., 336 F.2d 641 at page 644 (C.A. 6, 1964) where the Court said: “If the proffer correctly states the facts, a slavish adherence to the Board’s rules in this case would result in a greater injustice than the

National Labor Relations Board v. Baptist Hospital, Inc.

602 F.2d 131 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 8, 1979

This court denied enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board. N.L.R.B. v. Baptist Hospital, Inc., 576 F.2d 107 (6th Cir. 1978). … N.L.R.B. v. Baptist Hospital, Inc., - U.S. -, 99 S.Ct. 2598 , 61 L.Ed.2d 251 (1979).

National Steel Corporation, Great Lakes Steel Division v. National Labor Relations Board

415 F.2d 1231 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 3, 1969

The Board relies principally on Republic Aviation Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 324 U.S. 793 , 65 S.Ct. 982 (1945). … B. v.

The Union Savings and Trust Company v. National Labor Relations Board

643 F.2d 1249 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 17, 1981

Reviewing the facts as the Board did, we conclude that substantial evidence supports its findings. The Board did not abuse its discretion in concluding that the operation center is an appropriate bargaining unit. … Accordingly, we deny the bank’s petition and grant enforcement of the Board’s order in full.

National Labor Relations Board v. Digital Paging System of Toledo, Inc.

659 F.2d 725 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 17, 1981

The standard of review in Board cases is whether the Board’s determination is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. 29 U.S.C. § 160 (e); Universal Camera Corp. v. … We find substantial evidence in the record to support the Board’s findings of the unfair labor practices listed above. We also find the Board properly applied the guidelines of NLRB v.

Lela B. Brown v. Kroger Company, an Ohio Profit Corporation

291 F.2d 623 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 13, 1961

Brown, plaintiff-appellant, brought an action against Kroger Company, defendant-appellee, to recover damages for injuries sustained through the alleged negligence of the defendant. … Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 , 58 S.Ct. 817 , 82 L.Ed. 1188 ; Konen v. Moose Lodge No. 288, 345 Mich. 80 , 75 N.W.2d 330 ; VanBrocklin v. Bragman, 319 Mich. 220 , 29 N.W.2d 159 ; Filipowicz v. S. S.

National Labor Relations Board v. Teamsters Local No. 372

209 F.3d 936 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 4, 2000

209 F.3d 936 (6th Cir. 2000) NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, petitioner, v. … V. 17 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents, jointly and severally, shall pay to the Board the total sum of $13,500 within thirty (30) days of entry of this second supplemental consent order by the court.

National Labor Relations Board v. Gibraltar Industries, Inc.

653 F.2d 1091 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 20, 1981

P 12,897 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … See NLRB v.

Angela Lee Williams, a Minor, by Her Father and Next Friend, William Hardy Williams v. Jerald M. Ellington

936 F.2d 881 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 24, 1991

Further, the Board contends it is immune from liability based upon Monell v. Dept. of Social Services of New York, 436 U.S. 658 , 98 S.Ct. 2018 , 56 L.Ed.2d 611 (1978), and its progeny. … We agree the Board is immune from suit according to Monell , and therefore we need not address the issue on the basis of the eleventh amendment. In Monell v.

General Motors Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

610 F.2d 429 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 7, 1979

The Board has cross-petitioned for enforcement. … R.B.] is substantial, when viewed in the light that the record in its entirety furnishes, including the body of the evidence opposed to the Board’s view.” Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R.

City Of Canton, Ohio v. Maynard

766 F.2d 236 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 28, 1985

Sec. 1738 , Migra v. Warren City School District Board of Education, 465 U.S. 75 , 104 S.Ct. 892, 896 , 79 L.Ed.2d 56 (1984); Marrese v. … Johnson's Island, Inc. v. Board of Township Trustees, 69 Ohio St.2d 241, 244-46 , 431 N.E.2d 672 , 674-75 (1982); Swensen v. Cresop, 28 Ohio St. 668 (1876). See also Francis H. Fisher, Inc. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Commercial Cabinets, Inc.

89 F. App'x 511 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 9, 2004

As a result, the Board argues it is entitled to summary enforcement of its order. See NLRB v. … ; NLRB v.

Westchester Management Corporation v. United States Department Of Health And Human Services

948 F.2d 279 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 5, 1991

Before MARTIN and JONES, Circuit Judges, and BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge. BAILEY BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge. 1 Westchester Management Corporation d.b.a. … Bodimetric Health Servs. v.