Case law

Christina Piatt v. Louisville and Jefferson County Board of Education

556 F.2d 809 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 10, 1977

In Kleid v. Board of Education, 406 F.Supp. 902 (W.D.Ky. … Huffman v. Pursue, 420 U.S. 592 , 95 S.Ct. 1200 , 43 L.Ed.2d 482 (1975); Louisville Area Inter-Faith Committee v. Nottingham Liquors, 542 F.2d 652 (6th Cir. 1976); Forest Hills Utility Co. v.

Ohmer Register Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

131 F.2d 682 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 30, 1942

S. 333 , 49 S.Ct. 337 , 73 L.Ed. 720 ), that “reserves” have a definite meaning and .limitation under the taxing statutes (Brown v. … allowable deduction for income tax purposes, but, on the contrary, were mere “contingent liabilities” of the petitioner. ' Upon the principles of Brown v.

Robert Anthony Reed III v. James Rhodes, and Cleveland Board of Education

635 F.2d 556 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 8, 1980

Reed v. Rhodes, 607 F.2d 714, 737 (6th Cir. 1979). … The “Cleveland Defendants” are the Cleveland Board of Education and its members, and the superintendent of the Cleveland City School District. See Reed v. Rhodes, 422 F.Supp. 708, 712 (N.D.Ohio 1976). 2 .

Lee D. Glenn v. Merit Systems Protection Board

616 F.2d 270 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 5, 1980

Steinagel (79-3615), Petitioners, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent. Nos. 79-3351, 79-3530, 79-3543, 79-3579, 79-3612 and 79-3615. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued Dec. 14, 1979. … Kyles v. ICC, 197 U.S.App.D.C. 285 , 609 F.2d 540 (D.C.Cir.1979); In re Christian, 606 F.2d 823 (8th Cir. 1979); Gaskins v.

Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. Engler

146 F.3d 367 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 5, 1998

The Act established the Michigan Gaming Control Board and authorized the Board to grant up to three licenses for casino gaming in Detroit. Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. § 432.204 , § 432.206 (West Supp.1998). … Yet, in Brown v. Neeb, 644 F.2d 551 , 558 n. 12 (6th Cir.1981), we explained that the district court’s reading of the decree was merely an additional tool for contract interpretation.” Huguley v.

International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 18 v. National Labor Relations Board

837 F.3d 593 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 7, 2016

The winning parties may intervene to defend the Board’s judgment in their favor. See Int’l Union, United Auto., Aerospace & Agric. Implement Workers of Am., AFL-CIO, Local 283 v. Scofield, 382 U.S. 205, 208 (1965). … Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. Muchnick, 559 U.S. 154, 161 (2010); see also Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp., 546 U.S. 500, 510–12 (2006). We have picked up on the hint. See generally Maxwell v.

Wolf Creek Collieries v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, Department of Labor Evelyn Stephens

298 F.3d 511 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 2, 2002

Contrary to employer’s contention, the Board has not created a “preference” for a treating physician that is inconsistent with Tussey and Brown. Therefore, the Board rejects employer’s contention. … See also, Brown v. Rock Creek Mining, 996 F.2d 812 , 815 (6th Cir.1993).

Makela Welding, Inc., and Kemp Welding, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

387 F.2d 40 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 15, 1967

In N.L.R.B. v. … Enforcement of the order of the Board, modified with regard to the length of the back pay period, is granted. 1 . N.L.R.B. v.

Zantop International Airlines, Inc. v. National Mediation Board

732 F.2d 517 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 19, 1984

P 10,984 ZANTOP INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NATIONAL MEDIATION BOARD, an independent administrative agency of the United States; and Rowland K. … International In-Flight Catering Co., Ltd. v. National Mediation Board, 555 F.2d 712, 719 (1977). The Second Circuit agreed in British Airways Board v. National Mediation Board, 685 F.2d 52, 55 (1982).

Shelby Riggs v. Commonwealth of Kentucky

734 F.2d 262 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 1, 1984

Board of Regents of *265 State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … See Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, supra. Accordingly, the judgment of the Honorable Thomas A. Ballantine of the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky is affirmed. 1 . Patsy v.

Miami Foundry Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

682 F.2d 587 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 7, 1982

Williams Company, Petitioners, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, International Molders and Allied Workers Union, Local No. 45, AFL-CIO, Intervenor. No. 80-1731. … Boire v. Greyhound Corp., 376 U.S. 473, 481 , 84 S.Ct. 894, 898 , 11 L.Ed.2d 849 (1964). There is ample evidence on this record to support such a finding. 9 Accordingly, the order of the Board is affirmed.

National Labor Relations Board v. Ben Duthler, Inc. And Family Foods, Inc.

395 F.2d 28 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 23, 1968

National Labor Relations Board v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., 341 F.2d 750 (6th Cir. 1965); National Labor Relations Board v. Cumberland Shoe Corporation, 351 F.2d 917 (6th Cir. 1965); National Labor Relations Board v. … Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 321 U.S. 702 , 64 S.Ct. 817 , 88 L.Ed. 1020 (1944); National Labor Relations Board v. Atco-Surgical Supports, Inc., 394 F.2d 659 (6th Cir. 1968); National Labor Relations Board v.

Ward v. Stegall

93 F. App'x 805 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 24, 2004

See Sweeton v. … Brown, 27 F.3d 1162 , 1164-65 & n. 1 (6th Cir.1994). *807 Nevertheless, Ward continues to argue that the parole board violated his constitutional rights by keeping the disputed letters in his file and by refusing to grant

National Labor Relations Board v. M. A. Harrison Manufacturing Company, Inc.

682 F.2d 580 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 30, 1982

The question before us is whether the Board’s findings and conclusions underlying these orders are supported by substantial evidence on the record taken as a whole. See Universal Camera Corp. v. … As the Supreme Court held in Medo Corp. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Borg Warner Corporation

663 F.2d 666 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 28, 1981

P 13,114 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. BORG WARNER CORPORATION; Baker Industries, Inc.; Wells Fargo Armored Service Corporation; Pony Express Courier Corporation, Respondent. No. 80-1046. … N.L.R.B. v. Triumph Curing Center, 571 F.2d 462, 474 (9th Cir. 1978).

United States v. Billy Brown

310 F. App'x 776 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 12, 2009

Davis, 430 F.3d at 354 (quoting United States v. … United States v. Hayes, 218 F.3d 615, 619 (6th Cir.2000). But even if we do not consider these arguments forfeited, we would not find that Brown has shown error.

Horsehead Resource Development Co., Inc., Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner

154 F.3d 328 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 28, 1998

And in this case, as in Pease Co. v. … Brown as its head negotiator. On or before March 7, 1994, Brown called union agent Williams and scheduled another negotiating session for March 10.

United States v. Brown

239 F. App'x 243 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 21, 2007

See United States v. Davis, 458 F.3d 491, 495 (6th Cir. 2006). Brown challenges only the substantive reasonableness of his sentence. Brown Br. at 11; RED at 11. … In United States v.

The John Klann Moving and Trucking Company v. National Labor Relations Board

411 F.2d 261 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 9, 1969

N.L.R.B. v. Challenge-Cook Bros., 374 F.2d 147 (6th Cir. 1967). It is equally clear that the Board is not bound by the decision of the grievance committee. … Carey v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp., 375 U.S. 261 , 84 S.Ct. 401 , 11 L.Ed.2d 320 (1964); N.L.R.B. v. Auburn Rubber Co., 384 F.2d 1 (10th Cir. 1967); Ramsey v.

Jason K. Mithrandir v. Robert Brown, Jr. John Jabe Ray Toombs Richard Boody

37 F.3d 1499 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 29, 1994

MITHRANDIR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert BROWN, Jr.; John Jabe; Ray Toombs; Richard Boody, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-1477. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. … Moreover, given the emergency situation, Brown, as head of MDOC, had the authority to override the MDOC policy allowing prisoners to keep personal property in their cells. See Walker v.