Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.36s
Kings Local School District, Board of Education v. Zelazny
325 F.3d 724 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 7, 2003
As this court said in Thomas v. Cincinnati Board of Education, 918 F.2d 618, 624 (6th Cir. 1990), the seminal Supreme Court case, Board of Education v. … Dong v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Martin Arsham Sewing Company, and Martin Arsham
873 F.2d 884 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 15, 1989
In Nathanson v. … Thus, the Board is entitled to no priority over the claims of other unsecured creditors in the distribution of the debtor’s property. See NLRB v.
Modified on other grounds by National Labor Relations Board v. Martin Arsham Sewing Co., 882 F.2d 216 (1989)Cited 45 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 3, 2008
That No. 07-5465 United States v. … No. 07-5465 United States v. Brown Page 6 Brown’s sentence was imposed on May 17, 2007.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 19, 2008
United States v. Poole, 538 F.3d 644, 645 (6th Cir. 2008). Brown’s sentence was imposed on May 17, 2007. … V. For the foregoing reasons, we AFFIRM Brown’s sentence, but REMAND the case for reconsideration in light of the 2007 Amendments.
Cited 0 timesUnknownVickie Frost v. Hawkins County Board Of Education
851 F.2d 822 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 12, 1988
Monell v. … Louis v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDaniel K. Morse v. Gerald Wozniak
565 F.2d 959 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 22, 1977
Sullivan v. Brown, 544 F.2d 279, 284 (6th Cir. 1976); Ryan v. Aurora City Board of Education, 540 F.2d 222, 227 (6th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1041 , 97 S.Ct. 741 , 50 L.Ed.2d 753 (1977); Coe v. … Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 , 97 S.Ct. 568 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977); Plummer v. Board of Regents, 552 F.2d 716 (6th Cir. 1977); Lake Michigan College Federation of Teachers v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. New Idea, Inc.
133 F.2d 194 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 4, 1942
National Labor Relations Board, 311 U.S. 574 , 61 S.Ct. 320 , 85 L.Ed. 309 ; National Labor Relations Board v. … Hamilton-Brown Shoe Company v. National Labor Relations Board, 8 Cir., 104 F.2d 49 ; Cudahy Packing Company v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrenda K. Monroe v. County Board of Education of Madison County, Tennessee
439 F.2d 804 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 15, 1971
Green v. County School Board, 391 U.S. 430 [ 88 S.Ct. 1689 , 20 L.Ed.2d 716 ] (1968); Raney v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 443 , [ 88 S.Ct. 1697 , 20 L.Ed.2d 727 ] (1968); Monroe v. … Green v. County School Board, supra, at 439, 88 S.Ct. at 1694.
Cited 7 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Schmutz Foundry And Machine Company
678 F.2d 657 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 20, 1982
P 13,534 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, and International Molders and Allied Workers Union, Local # 214, AFL-CIO, Intervenor, v. SCHMUTZ FOUNDRY AND MACHINE COMPANY, Respondent. No. 81-1026. … of this entire record, we find substantial evidence to support the findings of fact and conclusions of law entered by the Board and therefore grant enforcement of the Board's order. 3 The basic issue in this case concerns
Cited 1 timesPublishedDeja Vu of Cincinnati, L.L.C. v. Union Township Board of Trustees
411 F.3d 777 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 21, 2005
Policy v. … Brown, 498 U.S. 466, 473 , 111 S.Ct. 880 , 112 L.Ed.2d 991 (1991). This argument focuses on the transient nature of employment by adult cabarets.
Cited 8 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Unit Train Coal Sales, Inc.
636 F.2d 1121 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 4, 1980
See NLRB v. Atlas Lumber Co., 611 F.2d 26 (3d Cir. 1979); NLRB v. Hi-Temp, Inc., 503 F.2d 583 (7th Cir. 1974); Modine Manufacturing Co. v. NLRB, 453 F.2d 292 (8th Cir. 1971); Intalco Aluminum Corp. v. … The finding of the ALJ to the contrary, adopted by the Board, is not supported by substantial evidence. Compare NLRB v. Atlas Lumber Co., supra; Wavecrest Home for Adults, supra.
Cited 2 timesPublishedDistrict 30, United Mine Workers v. National Labor Relations Board
819 F.2d 651 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 1, 1987
They only contest the Board’s finding that they carry some responsibility for the picketers’ actions. This court recently addressed a similar issue in Kitchen Fresh, Inc. v. … Steel Corp. v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedNorman Christian Wolfe, Jr. v. United States
256 F.2d 434 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 22, 1958
Dickinson v. United States, 1953, 346 U.S. 389, 392 , 74 S.Ct. 152,155 , 98 L.Ed. 132 . See, also, Jewell v. United States, 6 Cir., 1953, 208 F.2d 770, 771 ; Brown v. … Dealing with the type of suspicions which one or two members of appellant’s draft board may have entertained, the Ninth Circuit said in Brown v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrentwood Academy v. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Ass'n
442 F.3d 410 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 17, 2006
Brown, 317 U.S. 341 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943). … Meness and Chil-dress met with Brentwood Headmaster Brown in early June 1997 and asked Brown about King. Brown suggested that they put questions regarding King and other issues in writing and send them to him.
Reversed on other grounds by Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Ass'n v. Brentwood Academy, 551 U.S. 291 (2007)Cited 15 timesPublishedFirst Nat. Bank v. Commissioner
107 F.2d 141 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 8, 1939
Burnet v. Sanford & Brooks Company, 282 U.S. 359, 365 , 51 S.Ct. 150 , 75 L.Ed. 383 ; North American Oil Consolidated v. Burnet, 286 U.S. 417, 424 , 52 S.Ct. 613 , 76 L.Ed. 1197 ; Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. R. … Brown v. Helvering, 291 U.S. 193, 205 , 54 S.Ct. 356 , 78 L.Ed. 725 . The order of the Board is affirmed.
Cited 5 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Standard Heating and Cooling, Inc.
482 F.2d 946 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 28, 1973
by July 18, 1973, why the Board’s application for entry of summary judgment should not be granted, which order was duly served on the Respondent. … It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the application for summary entry of judgment be granted and that the order of the Board be enforced, and Respondent is ordered to comply therewith.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDon Lee Distributor, Inc. (Warren) v. National Labor Relations Board
145 F.3d 834 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 10, 1998
.; and Oak Distributing Co., Petitioners/ Cross-Respondents, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent/Cross-Petitioner, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 1038, Intervenor. Nos. 96-6704, 97-5140. … See NLRB v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedKim Jones v. The Board of Education Cleveland City School District
474 F.2d 1232 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 16, 1973
Griggs v. Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 , 91 S.Ct. 849 , 28 L.Ed.2d 158 (1971); Udall v. Tallman, 380 U.S. 1 , 85 S.Ct. 792 , 13 L.Ed.2d 616 (1965); Bowles v. … In our opinion it was error to enter summary judgment against the Board and its officials as there were disputed issues of both fact and law. S. J. Groves & Sons v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedDayton Hudson Department Store Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
987 F.2d 359 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 1, 1993
See, e.g., NLRB v. … Partnership v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedMichael Brown v. Kenneth McKee
340 F. App'x 254 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 15, 2009
- No. 07-2223 Brown v. … v.
Cited 5 timesUnpublished
Ask Donna