Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.41s
Airport Shuttle-Cincinnati, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
703 F.2d 220 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 25, 1983
See NLRB v. … The task of this Court is to determine whether the Board acted arbitrarily in the exercise of its discretion. See NLRB v. A.J.
Cited 1 timesPublishedTurnbull Cone Baking Company of Tennessee v. National Labor Relations Board
778 F.2d 292 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 11, 1985
A reviewing court may not disturb the Board’s findings of fact where there is substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole to support the Board’s findings. 29 U.S.C. § 160 (e), (f); Universal Camera Corp. v. … See NLRB v.
Cited 94 timesPublishedFluor Daniel, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
332 F.3d 961 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 9, 2003
Bolin Co. v. … Architectural Glass & Metal Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished447 F. App'x 706 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 6, 2012
See -6- No. 09-4530 United States v. Brown Florida v. … Brigham City v. Stuart, 547 U.S. 398, 403 -8- No. 09-4530 United States v. Brown (2006).
Cited 10 timesUnpublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Truck Drivers Union Local 164
651 F.2d 455 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 19, 1981
The record reveals that there was substantial evidence to support the findings of the National Labor Relations Board. Accordingly, the judgment of the National Labor Relations Board is hereby affirmed.
Cited 1 timesPublishedVan Dorn Plastic MacHinery Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
939 F.2d 402 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 18, 1991
Lowary v. Lexington Local Bd. of Educ., 903 F.2d 422, 427 (6th Cir.1990). In cases involving the Board, this principle from Chevron Oil Co. v. … The Board’s rulings may always be applied retroactively unless manifest injustice can be shown. Fox Painting Co. v. Nat’l Labor Relations Board, 919 F.2d 53, 56 (6th Cir.1990); Adair Standish Corp. v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. C & W Lektra Bat Co.
513 F.2d 200 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 26, 1975
of Elizabethtown, Inc. v. … B. v. Big Run Coal & Clay Co., 385 F.2d 788 (6th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 824 , 89 S.Ct. 83 , 21 L.Ed.2d 95 (1968). Accordingly, it is ordered that enforcement be granted.
Cited 3 timesPublishedHamilton Cnty Bd v. Natl Football League
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 19, 2007
See Paul Brown Stadium, available at No. 06-3348 Hamilton County Board of Commissioners Page 3 v. National Football League, et al. … Louis Convention & Visitors Comm’n No. 06-3348 Hamilton County Board of Commissioners Page 5 v. National Football League, et al. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHenry I. Siegel Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
417 F.2d 1206 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 4, 1969
In making its determination, the Board has the right to consider the total context within which the activities occur. N. L. R. B. v. Sinclair Co., 397 F.2d 157 (1st Cir. 1968); Daniel Construction Company v. N. L. R. … Under Section 10(c) of the Act, the Board has broad discretion to fashion appropriate remedies. Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 379 U.S. 203, 216 , 85 S.Ct. 398 , 13 L.Ed.2d 233 (1964); N. L. R. B. v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedArnold Graphics Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
505 F.2d 257 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 5, 1974
The order and decision of the Board is reported at 206 N.L.R.B. No. 43. The Board has filed a cross-application for enforcement of its order. … The Board agreed with this finding.
Cited 1 timesPublishedUnited States v. Willie G. Brown, Jr., A/K/A Lawrence Johnson
709 F.2d 14 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 8, 1983
This case involves an admittedly fraudulent scheme operated by defendant Brown with at least temporary success. … This case is, as we see it, distinguished from United States v.
Cited 2 timesPublished406 F.2d 1033 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 21, 1969
(BNA) 2344 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. I. D. LOWE (Trustee for Barber J. Thomas, Richard C. Lydle, and Marilyn K. Lyren), d/b/a Thermo-Rite Mfg. Co., and John E. Lydle and I. D. … NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. I. D. LOWE (Trustee for Barber J. Thomas, Richard C. Lydle, and Marilyn K. Lyren), d/b/a Thermo-Rite Mfg. Co., Respondent. Nos. 17723, 17724.
Cited 3 timesPublishedWalker Die Casting, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, And
682 F.2d 592 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 8, 1982
Larand Leisurelies, Inc. v. NLRB, 523 F.2d 814, 820 (6th Cir. 1975). … Pease Co. v. NLRB, 666 F.2d 1044 (6th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 2238 , 72 L.Ed.2d 848 (1982).
Cited 4 timesPublishedKayser-Roth Hosiery Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
430 F.2d 701 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 17, 1970
National Labor Relations Board, 419 F.2d 1265, 1269 (5th Cir. 1969), U.S.App.Pndg.; National Labor Relations Board v. Yutana Barge Lines, Inc., 315 F.2d 524, 528 (9th Cir. 1963); National Labor Relations Board v. I. B. … National Labor Relations Board v. Reed & Prince Manufacturing Company, supra.
Cited 1 timesPublishedSears, Roebuck and Company v. National Labor Relations Board
450 F.2d 56 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 13, 1971
This burden, of course, may be met by drawing legitimate inferences from established facts and it is the Board’s exclusive province to make such legitimate inferences. N. L. R. B. v. … B. v. Brown, 380 U.S. 278 , 85 S.Ct. 980 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839 (1965).
Cited 2 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Brazeway, Inc.
702 F.2d 623 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 1, 1983
NLRB v. … Camera v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBromine Division, Drug Research, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
580 F.2d 239 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 11, 1978
The pertinent facts are contained in the decision and order of the Board. … Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the order of the Board be and hereby is enforced.
Cited 1 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Teamsters' Freight Local No. 480
409 F.2d 610 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 23, 1969
Relations Act. *611 The Board’s decision and order are reported at 167 N.L.R.B. … Now therefore, it is ordered that the petition for enforcement of the said order of the Board may be, and it is hereby granted.
Cited 1 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Servco Automatic MacHine Products Co.
443 F.2d 377 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 14, 1971
The National Labor Relations Board petitions for enforcement of its bargaining order against the company reported at 183 N.L.R.B. 21 . … Reference is made to the decision of the Board for a more complete recitation of facts.
Cited 1 timesPublishedCyr Bottle Gas Company v. National Labor Relations Board
497 F.2d 900 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 4, 1974
of the Board for enforcement of its order. … The Board found that employees of the Company were engaged in an economic strike.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna