Case law

Decaturville Sportswear Company, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

573 F.2d 929 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 30, 1978

SPORTSWEAR COMPANY, INC., Marlene Industries Corporation, Trousdale Manufacturing Company, Inc., Westmoreland Manufacturing Corporation, Aynor Manufacturing Company, Inc., Loris Manufacturing Company, Inc., Petitioners, v. … unfair labor practice complaint lodged against the petitioning companies, and upon the motions of the respondent to dismiss the petition to review, deny the stay, and to issue an order clarifying its opinion in N.L.R.B. v.

Loose Leaf Hardware, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

748 F.2d 347 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 21, 1984

Loose Leaf Hardware, Inc. v. NLRB, 666 F.2d 1036 (6th Cir.1981). Following remand, a hearing was conducted before an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ). … The Company’s bargaining obligation arose at the time of the election and not when the Board reaffirmed on remand. An employer’s objections to certification do not relieve the employer of its duty to bargain. NLRB v.

B & S Coal Company and Old Republic Insurance Company v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

35 F.3d 1041 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 1, 1994

The operators in Bailey appealed this decision to the Board, but their appeal was stayed pending the outcome of Brown v. Sea B. Mining Co., 17 Black Lung Rep. (MB) 1-115 (Ben. Rev. Bd.1993) (en banc). … Brown consolidated several other cases that, like Bailey, involved interest assessments on Trust Fund reimbursements for medical benefits. 3 And, as had the ALJ in Bailey, the Board in Brown ultimately dismissed the case

Brown v. State of Tennessee Department of Labor & Workforce Development

64 F. App'x 425 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 2, 2003

The district court properly dismissed Brown’s complaint. Contrary to Brown’s arguments, Tennessee and its agencies are immune from liability for monetary damages under the Eleventh Amendment. See Welch v. … Thus, the Attorney General is entitled to absolute immunity in Brown’s civil rights action. See Prince v. Hicks, 198 F.3d 607, 611 (6th Cir.1999). Therefore, Brown’s claims against the Attorney General are meritless.

Ronald Bradley v. William J. Milliken, Governor of Michigan, and Michigan State Board Ofeducation, Board of Education, City of Detroit, Michigan

519 F.2d 679 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 19, 1975

Upon consideration, this court concludes that the District Judge had no choice, under the decision of the Supreme Court in Milliken v. … In Milliken v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Universal Gear Service Corp.

394 F.2d 396 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 16, 1968

Co. v. N. L. R. … B. v. S. H. Kress & Co., 194 F.2d 444 (6th Cir.1952) (Board order); N. L. R. B. v. Lynair, supra (Court decree).

Doyle v. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education

529 F.2d 524 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 10, 1975

529 F.2d 524 Doyle v. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education 75-1382 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Sixth Circuit 12/10/75 S.D.Ohio AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED IN PART

David Wolcott Kendall Memorial School v. National Labor Relations Board

866 F.2d 157 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 18, 1989

See NLRB v. … See also NLRB v.

United States v. Richard Brown

372 F. App'x 643 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 13, 2010

See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 52 (2007). … United States v. Vonner, 516 F. 3d 382, 389 (6th Cir. 2008) (en -5- No. 08-6463 United States of America v. Richard Steven Brown banc).

Dawson Carbide Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

782 F.2d 64 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 28, 1986

The scope of review in this case is the narrow one of determining whether the Board’s action was supported by substantial evidence. 29 U.S.C. § 160 (e), (f); Universal Camera Corp. v. … After review of the briefs, the records and the opinions of the AU and the Board, we are of the opinion that the Board’s finding of unfair labor practices was supported by substantial evidence.

National Labor Relations Board v. Health Care Logistics, Inc.

794 F.2d 248 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 10, 1986

(f) The Respondent may present issues raised in its objections to this Judgment (as proposed by the Board) in a subsequent compliance hearing before the Board with respect to adjustments claimed due to changed circumstances … The National Labor Relations Board has found that we violated the National Labor Relations Act and has ordered us to post and abide by this notice.

United States v. Lindell Brown

417 F. App'x 488 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 30, 2011

The cocaine came from California, and found its way into the Michigan- No. 08-2524 United States v. Brown based drug ring through a number of people. On occasion, Brown sold directly to Hampton. … Brown filed this timely appeal. -3- No. 08-2524 United States v. Brown II 1.

The Aetna Freight Lines, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

520 F.2d 928 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 18, 1975

Aetna further claims that the Board’s finding that the single owner-drivers are employees of Aetna is contrary to the Board’s own later decision in Ace Doran Hauling and Rigging Co. v. … We also noted in Ace Doran the language of the Supreme Court in NLRB v.

Guarino v. Brookfield Township Trustees

980 F.2d 399 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 25, 1992

See, Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532 , 105 S.Ct. 1487 , 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985); Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. Murgia, 427 U.S. 307 , 96 S.Ct. 2562 , 49 L.Ed.2d 520 (1976).

Medical Center at Bowling Green v. National Labor Relations Board

712 F.2d 1091 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 4, 1983

Given the Board’s administrative expertise in resolving disputes concerning supervisory status, its decisions will usually not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion. See NLRB v. … See ATR Wire & Cable Co. v. NLRB, 671 F.2d 188 (6th Cir. 1982); NLRB v. Curtis Noll Corp., 634 F.2d 1027 (6th Cir.1980).

Mark Brinkman v. John J. Gilligan, Governor of the State of Ohio

518 F.2d 853 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 24, 1975

Segregative acts and practices were found to have occurred both before and after the decision of the Supreme Court in Brown v. … Board of Education of the City of Grand Rapids, (No. 7—2189) [No. 73-2198], 508 F.2d 779 (1974). The Court in Higgins followed Deal v.

John Morrison v. National Labor Relations Board

772 F.2d 283 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 18, 1985

(Nos. 84-5959/6069), Petitioners, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. Nos. 84-5931, 84-5959 and 84-6069. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued Aug. 19, 1985. Decided Sept. 18, 1985. D. … Allen, III (LEAD), Brown, Todd & Heyburn, Michael L. Boylan, argued, Louisville, Ky., for petitioners. Elliott Moore/David Fleischer, argued, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C.

Wikol v. Birmingham Public Schools Board Of Education

360 F.3d 604 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 10, 2004

360 F.3d 604 Anika WIKOL, by and through her next friends, Murray and Nanette WIKOL, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. BIRMINGHAM PUBLIC SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant. No. 02-1798. … Doe v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Pipefitters Union Local No. 120

719 F.2d 178 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 26, 1983

The Board now seeks enforcement of its order. 29 U.S.C. § 160 (e). II. A. We recognize at the outset that the Board’s decision is subject to limited judicial review. NLRB v. … Hamilton Foundry & Machine Co. v.

Peoples Service Drug Stores, Inc., Petitoner v. National Labor Relations Board

375 F.2d 551 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 5, 1967

See, Universal Camera Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Denver Bldg. & Const. … The following cases affirmed the Board’s findings of lack of good faith. N.L.R.B. v. Cumberland Shoe Corporation, 351 F.2d 917 (C.A. 6); N.L.R.B. v.