Case law

National Labor Relations Board v. Clayton & Lambert Manufacturing Co.

149 F.2d 642 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 11, 1945

This cause coming on to be heard before the court upon petition of the National Labor Relations Board, pursuant to Section 10(e) of the National Labor Relations Act, 49 Stat. 449 , 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq., for enforcement … that, respondent engaged in unfair labor practices within the meaning of Section 8(1) (3) of the Act; therefore, the order of the Board will be enforced.

National Labor Relations Board v. Standard Knitting Mills, Inc.

123 F.2d 58 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 14, 1941

Substantial evidence being found in the record to support the decision and order of the National Labor Relations Board, the petition for enforcement of the order of the Board is allowed as prayed, except that, at the request … In all other respects, the order of the National Labor Relations Board is sustained.

Red Barns System, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

574 F.2d 315 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 22, 1976

After considering the briefs and oral argument, the Court concludes that the decision of the Board is supported by substan *316 tial evidence on the record considered as a whole. … Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the order of the Board be and hereby is enforced. Judge Celebrezze would deny enforcement of the Board’s order.

Northcross v. Board of Education of Memphis City Schools

511 F.2d 1403 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 26, 1975

511 F.2d 1403 Northcross v. Board of Education of Memphis City Schools 74-2232 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Sixth Circuit 2/26/75 1 W.D.Tenn. AFFIRMED

Plummer v. Board of Regents of Murray State University

511 F.2d 1404 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 25, 1975

511 F.2d 1404 Plummer v. Board of Regents of Murray State University 74-2054 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Sixth Circuit 2/25/75 1 W.D.Ky. VACATED AND REMANDED

National Labor Relations Board v. General Automation Mfg., Inc.

408 F.2d 380 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 18, 1969

No. 66, it appears to the Court that the findings and order of the Board are supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. … Now, therefore, it is ordered that the order of the Board be, and it is, hereby enforced.

National Labor Relations Board v. Kentucky Utilities Company, Inc.

191 F.2d 858 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 19, 1951

The above cause coming on to be heard on petition of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order, and after consideration of the transcript of record, the briefs of the parties, and argument of counsel … Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the petition of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order be and the same is hereby granted, subject to the following modifications: The order

Cincinnati Milling Machine Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

102 F.2d 979 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 14, 1939

The National Labor Relations Board having duly moved this Court that petitioner’s petition to review and set aside the Board’s order of October 27, 1938, which petition was filed herein on December 22, 1938, be dismissed, … and it appearing that the Board has vacated and set aside its said order, it is ordered that said petition to review and set aside the Board’s order be, and it hereby is, dismissed.

National Labor Relations Board v. Southern Electronics Company, Inc.

312 F.2d 255 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 10, 1963

they had given testimony at a Board hearing. … Upon consideration of the entire record before us, as a whole, we conclude that the findings and order of the Board are not supported by substantial evidence. Section 160(e), Title 29 U.S.C.; Universal Camera Corp. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Jack Smith Beverages, Inc.

202 F.2d 100 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 17, 1953

National Labor Relations Board v. Dant, 344 U.S. 375 , 73 S.Ct. 375 . … Stores Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 326 U.S. 376, 393 , 66 S.Ct. 203 , 90 L.Ed. 145 ; Globe Cotton Mills v. National Labor Relations Board, 5 Cir., 103 F.2d 91 ; National Labor Relations Board v.

Ronald Bradley v. William J. Milliken, Governor of Michigan, and Michigan State Board Ofeducation, Board of Education, City of Detroit, Michigan

519 F.2d 679 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 19, 1975

Upon consideration, this court concludes that the District Judge had no choice, under the decision of the Supreme Court in Milliken v. … In Milliken v.

Travelers' Ins. v. Mayor of Johnson City

99 F. 663 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 12, 1900

Justice Brown mentioned, as a most satisfactory case upon this point, Railway Co. v. … Brown, 106 U. S. 487 , 1 Sup. Ct. 442, 27 L. Ed. 238 ; Louisiana v. Wood, 102 U. S. 294 , 26 L. Ed. 153 ; Hitchcock v. Galveston, 96 U. S. 341 , 24 L. Ed. 659 .

Richard Miller v. Board of Education of Jefferson County, Kentucky

452 F.2d 894 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 23, 1971

Miller v. Noe (Ky.), 432 S.W.2d 818 (1968). In the report of Superintendent of Schools Noe to the Kentucky State Board of Education, he stated: “Since Mr. … Orr v. Trinter, 444 F.2d 128 (6th Cir. 1971). The proof is barren as to any evidence of discrimination against Miller or violation of his constitutional rights.

Steele v. Industrial Development Board of Metropolitan Government Nashville

301 F.3d 401 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 14, 2002

The Industrial Development Board approved the loan and financed it by issuing tax-exempt industrial development bonds worth $15 million. Steele v. Indus. Dev. Bd. of Metro. … Thus, the rule under the pervasively sectarian test, as stated in Roemer v. Board of Publ.

Krispy Kreme Doughnut Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

732 F.2d 1288 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 27, 1984

Application of this standard requires the Court to consider the body of evidence which opposes the Board’s decision, but prohibits the Court from conducting a de novo review of the record. Union Carbide Corp. v. … It is normally the function of the Board to resolve factual controversy and credibility questions. N.L.R.B. v. I.U.O.E., Local 18, 500 F.2d 48 (6th Cir.1974).

Russell v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

832 F.2d 349 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 27, 1987

Old Cannonsburg's outstanding shares and the Brown Group became the sole members of Old Cannonsburg's board of directors. … Brown v. United States, 782 F.2d 559 (6th Cir.1986), remanding 600 F.Supp. 47 (W.D.Ky.1984).

Don Lee Distributor, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

145 F.3d 834 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 2, 1998

United States Can Co. v. … Organizing Comm. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. La-Z-Boy Tennessee

623 F.2d 20 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 17, 1980

Jervis Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 387 F.2d 107, 111 (6th Cir. 1967). … Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951). *21 We are of the opinion that the Board’s order is supported by substantial evidence and is not unlawful.

Anderson v. General American Life Ins.

141 F.2d 898 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 7, 1944

Brown, president, and Charles F. … in certain instances, the Board of Directors did oppose his will.

Emily Thomas, Cross-Appellant v. Cincinnati Board of Education, Cross-Appellee

918 F.2d 618 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 6, 1990

Karl v. Board of Educ. of Genesco School District, 736 F.2d 873 , 877 (2d Cir.1984). … (Citing Board of Educ. v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176 , 204 n. 26, 102 S.Ct. 3034 , 3049 n. 26, 73 L.Ed.2d 690 (1982)).