Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca6

10,000+ results

1.05s

  • Laverty v. Brown

    787 F.2d 591 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 7, 1986

    HURT, ET AL., Plaintiffs v. ROBERT BROWN, JR.; THEODORE KOEHLER; DR.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Brown v. City of Cleveland

    294 F. App'x 226 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 23, 2008

    No. 07-3535 Brown v. … 5 No. 07-3535 Brown v.

    Cited 10 timesUnpublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. St. Marys Foundry Co.

    860 F.2d 679 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 3, 1988

    The Board also found that St. Mar-ys Foundry, Inc. (“SMF”) was a successor employer to St. Marys under the analysis employed by the Supreme Court in Golden State Bottling Co. v. … As we recently pointed out in NLRB v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Murray Ohio Manufacturing Company

    328 F.2d 613 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 5, 1964

    Appeal No. 15,014 involved primarily the Board’s order requiring reinstatement of 22 employees claimed to have been discriminatorily refused reemployment. … posted as part of the enforcement of the Board’s order in No. 15,015 will be adequate to take care of 8(a) (1) violations, whether they occurred in No. 15,014, or No. 15,015.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Kessel Food Markets, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    868 F.2d 881 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 1, 1989

    See Amos Treat & Co. v. SEC, 306 F.2d 260 (D.C.Cir.1962); King v. Caesar Rodney School District, 380 F.Supp. 1112 (D.Del.1974). … Moreover, the Unions’ argument that the ALJ and the Board are bound by Kallman, d/b/a Love’s Barbeque v. NLRB, 640 F.2d 1094 (9th Cir.1981), to make such an inference is without merit.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Wayne County Board of County Commissioners v. Mendel, Inc.

    22 F. App'x 488 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 29, 2001

    United States v. Safeco Ins. Co. of Am., Inc., 870 F.2d 338, 340 (6th Cir. 1989). … IRS v. McDermott, 507 U.S. 447, 449 , 113 S.Ct. 1526 , 123 L.Ed.2d 128 (1993).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Michigan Community Services, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    309 F.3d 348 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 30, 2002

    AFSCME v. … The Board refers us to the statement in Mast, Foos & Co. v. Stover Mfg.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Campbell v. Board of Trustees of Ohio State University

    705 F.2d 451 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 14, 1982

    705 F.2d 451 Campbell v. Board of Trustees of Ohio State University 79-3629 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Sixth Circuit 9/14/82 S.D.Ohio, 476 F.Supp. 21 AFFIRMED

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Gordon S. Plummer v. Board of Regents, Murray State University

    552 F.2d 716 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 8, 1977

    Board of Regents, 496 F.2d 322 (6th Cir. 1974); and Harp v. Clemens, 464 F.2d 1028 (6th Cir. 1972). See also, Wells v. Board of Regents, 545 F.2d 15 (6th Cir. 1976); Sullivan v. … Brown, 544 F.2d 279 (6th Cir. 1976); Ryan v. Aurora City Board of Education, 540 F.2d 222 (6th Cir. 1976), cert. denied. - U.S. -, 97 S.Ct. 741 , 50 L.Ed.2d 753 (1977); Manchester v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Boot-Ster Manufacturing Company, Inc.

    405 F.2d 1210 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 21, 1969

    The Board is not seeking enforcement of the bargaining provisions of the order because the union subsequently advised the regional director that it no longer wishes to represent the company’s employees. In N.L.R.B. v. … Upon consideration, we are of the opinion that, while this Court might have reached a contrary result if it were authorized to make de novo findings, the Board’s order is supported by substantial evidence. N.L.R.B. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • MacHine Tool and Gear, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    652 F.2d 596 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 30, 1980

    However, the Board’s finding that there were no misrepresentations outside the standard set out in N.L. R.B. v. Gissel Packing Co. … This Court finds that the Board’s issuance of the Bargaining Order to remedy the Company’s unfair labor practices is not an abuse of the discretion given the Board under § 10(c) of the Act. See N.L.R.B. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Carlos Briggs v. University of Detroit-Mercy

    611 F. App'x 865 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 12, 2015

    PageID 1798 (citing Brown v. Gojcaj Foods, Inc., No. 09–14537, 2011 WL 1980533, at *3 (E.D. Mich. May 20, 2011)). … See Brown v. VHS of Mich., Inc., 545 Fed. App’x 368, 371 (6th Cir. 2013) (“[E]ven if two claims provide the same remedy, a plaintiff asserting both needs to establish the legal elements of each.

    Cited 21 timesUnpublished
  • Lockard v. Board of Educ. Of Princeton School Dist

    705 F.2d 455 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 18, 1982

    705 F.2d 455 Lockard v. Board of Educ. of Princeton School Dist. 81-3247 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Sixth Circuit 10/18/82 S.D.Ohio AFFIRMED

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Schwan's Sales Enterprises, Inc.

    687 F.2d 163 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 1, 1982

    However, an election which the union lost was set aside and a new election ordered by the Board. … The order of the Board is enforced.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Whitehead v. Merit Systems Protection Board, Department of Army

    672 F.2d 919 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 6, 1981

    672 F.2d 919 Whitehead v. Merit Systems Protection Board, Department of Army 79-3614 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Sixth Circuit 11/6/81 1 M.S.P.B. REMANDED

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Red Barns System, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    574 F.2d 315 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 22, 1976

    After considering the briefs and oral argument, the Court concludes that the decision of the Board is supported by substan *316 tial evidence on the record considered as a whole. … Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the order of the Board be and hereby is enforced. Judge Celebrezze would deny enforcement of the Board’s order.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Deborah A. Northcross v. Board of Education of Memphis City Schools, Deborah A. Northcross v. Board of Education of Memphis City Schools

    444 F.2d 1179 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 7, 1971

    Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, 402 U.S. 1 , 91 S.Ct. 1267 , 28 L.Ed.2d 554 (1971); Davis v. … Board of School Comm’rs of Mobile County, 402 U.S. 33 , 91 S.Ct. 1289 , 28 L.Ed.2d 577 (1971); North Carolina State Bd. of Educ. v. Swann, 402 U.S. 43 , 91 S.Ct. 1284 , 28 L.Ed.2d 586 ; McDaniel v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Northcross v. Board of Education of Memphis City Schools

    511 F.2d 1403 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 26, 1975

    511 F.2d 1403 Northcross v. Board of Education of Memphis City Schools 74-2232 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Sixth Circuit 2/26/75 1 W.D.Tenn. AFFIRMED

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Plummer v. Board of Regents of Murray State University

    511 F.2d 1404 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 25, 1975

    511 F.2d 1404 Plummer v. Board of Regents of Murray State University 74-2054 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Sixth Circuit 2/25/75 1 W.D.Ky. VACATED AND REMANDED

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. General Automation Mfg., Inc.

    408 F.2d 380 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 18, 1969

    No. 66, it appears to the Court that the findings and order of the Board are supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. … Now, therefore, it is ordered that the order of the Board be, and it is, hereby enforced.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.