Case law

National Labor Relations Board v. Catherine McAuley Health Center

885 F.2d 341 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 20, 1989

In NLRB v. … V. For the reasons set forth above, we DENY ENFORCEMENT of the order of the Board.

National Labor Relations Board v. CompManagement Health Systems, Inc.

8 F. App'x 361 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 27, 2001

CONSENT JUDGMENT This cause was submitted upon the application of the National Labor Relations Board (the “Board”) for the enforcement of a certain order on consent issued by it against the respondent, CompManagement Health … The Board has also submitted the transcript of the record in said proceeding, certified and filed in this court, enforcing the order.

Brown v. Thornburg

966 F.2d 1451 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 29, 1992

Frank Cisco BROWN, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Richard THORNBURG, Attorney General; United States Parole Commission; Charles Pennington; U.S. Marshal Service; Dewey Sowders, Warden, Respondents-Appellees. No. 92-5053. … Brown has submitted a motion for the appointment of counsel. 5 Upon review, we conclude that Brown's arguments do not warrant habeas relief for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge and the district court.

National Labor Relations Board v. Tid-Bit Products Company

620 F.2d 581 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 1, 1980

ORDER On December 5,1977, the National Labor Relations Board (hereinafter the “Board”) issued an order pursuant to Section 10(e) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended ( 61 Stat. 136 , 73 Stat. 519 , 88 Stat. 395 … In essence the Board found that the reassignment and subsequent layoff of Ms.

National Labor Relations Board v. Local 334, Laborers International Union

481 F.3d 875 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 6, 2007

“Our deference to findings of fact runs in favor of the Board, not in favor of the ALJ.” W.F. Bolin Co. v. NLRB, 70 F.3d 863, 870 (6th Cir. 1995). … NLRB v.

United Services for the Handicapped v. National Labor Relations Board

678 F.2d 661 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 24, 1982

The Board’s factual determination, therefore, should not be disturbed. Machine Tool and Gear v. NLRB, 652 F.2d 596, 597 (6th Cir. 1980); Pulley v. NLRB, 395 F.2d 870, 875 (6th Cir. 1968). … First, the usual deference given to the NLRB findings is lessened when the Board orders the strong and less preferred remedy of a bargaining order without holding a new election. NLRB v.

Wilton Corporation v. Ashland Castings Corporation Ashland Capital Corporation Chimera Corporation, Keith A. Brown

188 F.3d 670 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 18, 1999

Brown, its sole shareholder, president and chairman of the board. … Wilton puts it in its brief (p. 5) "that Brown used his power as sole shareholder, as president, as a director and chairman of the board, and as its primary, if not only source of funding, to cause Ashland to breach its contract

National Labor Relations Board v. Priced-Less Discount Foods, Inc.

407 F.2d 1325 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 27, 1969

The Court granted enforcement of the order of the Board in this case but remanded the case to the Board for formulation and distribution of an appropriate notice informing the employees of their rights under the statute and … The Board added a sentence to the fifth paragraph of the notice to employees as follows: “However, the employees may, at an appropriate time, petition the National Labor Relations Board for an election, pursuant to Section

Stancliff v. Brown

925 F.2d 1465 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 12, 1991

Kathy STANCLIFF, Individually and doing business as The King's Kids Academy, Donald Stancliff, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Tina BROWN, Gloria Beattie, Denise Hobbs, Judy Clancey, Sarah Hogan, Charles C.

Scott v. United States Railroad Retirement Board

631 F.3d 359 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 11, 2011

No. 09-4045 Scott v. United States Railroad Retirement Board Page 5 § 255.11(b). … See, e.g., Goodwin v. R.R. Ret. Bd., 546 F.2d 1169, 1172 (5th Cir. 1997); Burleson v. R.R. Ret. Bd., 711 F.2d 861, 862 (8th Cir. 1983). No. 09-4045 Scott v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Plymouth Stamping Division, Eltec Corporation

870 F.2d 1112 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 27, 1989

A refusal to bargain over a proper subject of mandatory bargaining violates the Congressionally created duty and may be remedied by Board order. NLRB v. Katz, 369 U.S. 736 , 82 S.Ct. 1107 , 8 L.Ed.2d 230 (1962). … The Board was entitled to find a notice of five business days was insufficient time to allow a meaningful exchange under all the circumstances here. Cf. NLRB v.

Thomas Brown v. City of Franklin

430 F. App'x 382 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 28, 2011

5 Brown v. … Hein v. All Am. Plywood Co., 232 F.3d 482, 489 (6th Cir. 2000). The district court correctly concluded that Brown has not put forth sufficient evidence with which to prove such pretext. Brown v.

Jones v. Brown

833 F.2d 1012 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 13, 1987

Eunice JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert BROWN, Jr., Ted Koehler, Howard D. Harris, James Schmeltzer, Mike J. Crowley, Bill Johnson, Jerry Sherman, Crawford, George Pennell, Duane Cory, G.B. … Brown, Defendants-Appellees. No. 87-1470. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Nov. 13, 1987. Before ENGEL, MERRITT and ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dayton Food Fair Stores, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

399 F.2d 153 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 3, 1968

The petitioner, Dayton Food Fair Stores, Inc., seeks to have an order of the National Labor Relations Board set aside, and the Board cross-petitions for enforcement. … B. v. Fleetwood Trailer Co., 389 U.S. 375 , 88 S.Ct. 543 , 19 L.Ed.2d 614 (1967) ; National Labor Relations Board v. Mackay Radio & Telegraph Co., 304 U.S. 333 , 58 S.Ct. 904 , 82 L.Ed. 1381 (1938).

Danner v. Board of Professional Responsibility of Tennessee Supreme Court

277 F. App'x 575 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 6, 2008

Brown v. Bd. of Prof'l Resp., 29 S.W.3d 445, 449 (Tenn.2000) (quoting In re Burson, 909 S.W.2d 768, 773 (Tenn.1995)). … The Court has noted that the Tennessee Board of Professional Responsibility, like the Board of Examiners, derived its functions and authority from the Supreme Court. Brown, 29 S.W.3d at 449 ; Mercer v.

Deborah A. Northcross v. Board of Education of the Memphis City Schools

444 F.2d 1184 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 7, 1971

In addition to the classic pattern of building schools specifically intended for Negro or white students, school authorities have sometimes, since Brown, [Brown v. … United States v. Board of Public Instruction, 395 F.2d 66 (CA5 1968); Brewer v. School Board [of Norfolk, Va.], 397 F.2d 37 (CA4 1968).”

Consumers of Ohio J. Casmere Shaba-Stubbs v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation

52 F.3d 325 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 19, 1995

Casmere Shaba-Stubbs, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-3574. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. April 19, 1995. … See Paugh v. R.J.

Csx Transportation Inc. v. Neil J. Marquar, Mac A. Fleming, F.N. Simpson, and Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes

980 F.2d 359 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 13, 1992

The Board has exclusive jurisdiction over minor disputes, and a party cannot bypass the Board and take the dispute into federal court, except to enforce the Board’s award. McKinney v. … Brown’s reasoning is undercut by Sullivan v.

Cleveland Area Board of Realtors v. The City of Euclid

88 F.3d 382 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 8, 1996

The court quoted Metromedia, Inc. v. … Similarly, in City of Renton v.

Board of Education of Muhlenberg County, Kentucky v. United States

920 F.2d 370 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 3, 1990

In Clevinger v. … because of our decision in Rose v.