Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.06s
National Labor Relations Board v. Republic Steel Corp.
170 F.2d 152 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 15, 1948
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Morristown Knitting Mills
179 F.2d 242 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 9, 1949
Upon consideration of the motion of respondent, Morristown Knitting Mills, concurred in by the petitioner, It is ordered that this case be and the same is hereby remanded to the National Labor Relations Board to permit the … of all the evidence heretofore taken and to be taken, including evidence as to events occurring since the hearing before the trial examiner, what modification, if any, should be made in the Board’s order.
Cited 0 timesPublishedKeco Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
271 F.2d 263 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 22, 1959
The labor *264 board has prayed a decree enforcing its amended order in full. We are of opinion that the position of the board is correct. … Accordingly, the petition of Keco Industries, Inc., to set aside the amended order of the National Labor Relations Board is denied; and the order of the board, as amended, is directed to be enforced in full.
Cited 0 timesPublishedThe Cross Company v. National Labor Relations Board
260 F.2d 746 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 23, 1958
The decision of the National Labor Relations Board rested on a two-to-one vote. … Accordingly, the order of the National Labor Relations Board is set aside; and the complaint filed August 15, 1956, is dismissed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Associated MacHines, Inc.
239 F.2d 858 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 26, 1956
The oral arguments, briefs, and the entire record have been heard and considered on this petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order; And it appearing that there is substantial evidence to … support the finding of the labor board that the respondent company violated sections 8(a) (1), (2) and (3) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. § 158 (a) (1-3), by entering into and maintaining in
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States v. George David Brandt, Norman Brown, Iii, Joseph Thurman McAdams
717 F.2d 955 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 15, 1983
Thereafter, the Magistrate granted the Brown Group’s pretrial motions to dismiss. The government sought review of the rulings in the district court. … Grayned v.
Cited 15 timesPublished451 F.2d 1244 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 6, 1971
Brown v. Reaves, 388 F.2d 682 (5th Cir. 1968). The Supreme Court vacated the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remanded for further consideration in light of Carafas v. LaVallee, supra. Brown v. … Brown v. Re-sor, 407 F.2d 281, 283 (5th Cir. 1969).
Cited 5 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Production Plating Company
614 F.2d 1117 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 19, 1980
ORDER The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its order reported at 233 NLRB No. 25 . … in NLRB v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedHilton Inn North v. National Labor Relations Board
817 F.2d 391 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 4, 1987
The petitioner Hilton Inn North (the petitioner or Hilton), a Columbus, Ohio hotel, petitioned for review and respondent National Labor Relations Board (the NLRB or the Board) applied for enforcement of a Board order in this … The Board in a published decision affirmed the ALJ’s factual findings and conclusions and adopted his recommended order. Hilton Inn North, 279 N.L.R.B. No. 9 (1986).
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Tennessee Products Corp.
134 F.2d 486 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 6, 1943
. § 160(e), supports the findings of the Board. National Labor Relations Board v. Waterman S. S. Corporation, 309 U.S. 206 , 60 S.Ct. 493 , 84 L.Ed. 704 ; National Labor Relations Board v. … Co. v. Labor Board, 312 U.S. 660 , 61 S.Ct. 736 , 85 L.Ed. 1108 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Nevada Consolidated Copper Corporation, 316 U.S. 105 , 62 S.Ct. 960 , 86 L.Ed. 1305 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedManion v. Michigan Board of Medicine
765 F.2d 590 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 24, 1985
Imbler v. … Windsor v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Fisher Cheese Company
652 F.2d 607 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 29, 1980
The Board agreed. … in NLRB v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBilly Ison v. Madison Local Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ.
3 F.4th 887 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 7, 2021
Blickensderfer, FROST BROWN TODD LLC, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Jennifer M. … Blickensderfer, FROST BROWN TODD LLC, Cincinnati, Ohio, Brodi J. Conover, FROST BROWN TODD LLC, West Chester, Ohio, for Appellee. No. 20-4108 Ison, et al. v. Madison Local Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ.
Cited 29 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Hospitality Motor Inn, Inc.
667 F.2d 562 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 5, 1982
The Board rejected these reasons as not satisfying the statutory obligation to bargain in good faith. Sweeney & Co. v. … to deal with a specialized field of knowledge .... ” NLRB v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Dole Fresh Vegetables, Inc.
334 F.3d 478 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 28, 2003
Bolin Co. v. NLRB, 70 F.3d 863, 870 (6th Cir.1995). “Substantial evidence” is evidence that is “adequate, in a reasonable mind, to uphold the [Board’s] decision.” NLRB v. Gen. … We review the Board’s denial of an evidentiary hearing for an abuse of discretion. NLRB v. Gormac Custom Mfg., Inc., 190 F.3d 742, 746 (6th Cir.1999). In Office Depot, Inc. v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedChilders Products Company v. National Labor Relations Board
653 F.2d 242 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 19, 1981
The Board cross-petitions for enforcement of its order of the same date that Childers shall bargain collectively with the Union upon request. The Board’s decision and order are reported at 242 N.L.R.B. … Accordingly, the order of the Board is enforced.
Cited 0 timesPublishedThe Timken Company v. National Labor Relations Board
652 F.2d 610 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 8, 1981
The Board filed a cross-appeal for enforcement of its order. The Board found that the Timken Company maintained an employee handbook always in effect at the Company’s Bucyrus Plant. … It should be noted that the Board’s ruling constituted a complete reversal of the ALJ’s findings in this case.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDrake v. State of Ohio Board of Education
642 F.2d 451 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 19, 1980
642 F.2d 451 Drake v. State of Ohio Board of Education 80-3062 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Sixth Circuit 12/19/80 N.D.Ohio AFFIRMED
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Savair Manufacturing Company
611 F.2d 169 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 19, 1979
*170 ORDER The National Labor Relations Board has applied for enforcement of an order based upon its finding of violations of Section 8(a)(1) and 8(a)(4) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 158 (a)(1) and (4 … Enforcement of the Board’s order will be granted, based upon the 8(a)(1) violation found by the Board.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Global Door, Inc.
601 F.2d 255 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 11, 1979
, the court grants enforcement of the relief ordered by the Board. … Senior Judge Phillips concurred in relation to the portion of the Board’s order dealing with rehiring employee Schmuck and otherwise dissented.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna