Case law

Ballas Egg Products, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

283 F.2d 871 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 21, 1960

B. v. California Date Growers Association, 9 Cir., 259 F.2d 587 affirming 118 N.L.R.B. 246 ; and Olin Mathieson Chemical Corporation v. N. L. R. B., 4 Cir., 232 F.2d 158 , affirming 114 N.L.R.B. 486 . … Accordingly, the decision of the National Labor Relations Board is affirmed; and its order is directed to be enforced.

Jervis Corporation, Bolivar Division v. National Labor Relations Board

387 F.2d 107 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 13, 1967

In NLRB v. … The burden of proving illegal motivation is'on the Board. Quality Castings Co. v. NLRB, 325 F.2d 36 (6th Cir. 1963).

The Rogers Manufacturing Company v. National Labor Relations Board

486 F.2d 644 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 24, 1973

B. v. Robinson, 251 F. 2d 639, 641-642 (6th Cir. 1958). The record contains considerable support for a finding of violation of this standard, as the Board found. … B. v. Erie Resistor Corp., 373 U.S. 221, 230-237 , 83 S.Ct. 1139 , 10 L.Ed.2d 308 (1963); Philip Carey Manufacturing Co. v. N. L. R.

National Labor Relations Board v. Ford Brothers, Inc.

786 F.2d 232 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 19, 1986

The Board’s order should be enforced by this Court if the Board’s findings are supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as whole. Universal Camera Corp. v. … See First National Maintenance Corp. v. NLRB, 452 U.S. 666, 675 , 101 S.Ct. 2573, 2579 , 69 L.Ed.2d 318 (1981); Chemical Workers v.

Spitzer Akron, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

470 F.2d 1000 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 27, 1972

The Board’s decision is reported at 195 N.L.R.B. No. 24. Reference is made to the reported decision of the *1001 Board for a detailed recitation of the facts. … B. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc., 406 U.S. 272 , 92 S.Ct. 1571 , 32 L.Ed.2d 61 (1972); N. L. R. B. v. Wayne Convalescent Center, Inc., 465 F.2d 1039 (6th Cir. 1972).

National Labor Relations Board v. Carter Lumber, Inc.

507 F.2d 1262 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 17, 1974

We are in agreement with the holding of the Fifth Circuit in Oil City Brass Works v. … The Second Circuit in Pedersen v.

Board of Trustees v. B & B Mechanical Services, Inc.

813 F.3d 603 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 29, 2015

Health & Welfare Fund v. N.Y. … Apprenticeship & Training Program v.

National Labor Relations Board v. State Plating & Finishing Company

738 F.2d 733 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 3, 1984

Finally, in NLRB v. … And in NLRB v. Pinkerton’s, Inc., 621 F.2d 1322 (6th Cir.1980), and NLRB v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Marquette Metal Products Co.

152 F.2d 964 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 14, 1946

Heinz Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 311 U.S. 514, 518, 519 , 61 S.Ct. 320 , 85 L.Ed. 309 ; National Labor Relations Board v. M. A. … Hanna Co., 6 Cir., 125 F.2d 786 , 788: It is ordered that a decree issue enforcing the order of the National Labor Relations Board as prayed in the petition.

Timken-Detroit Axle Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

197 F.2d 512 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 24, 1952

F. of L. v. N.L.R.B., supra, Norris, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 85 U.S.App. D.C. 106, 177 F.2d 26 . … In the latter case, the court said: “The statutory scheme of procedure for judicial review of Board action was not changed by the amendment.” This case accords with the views expressed by us in Ohio Power Company v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Belfry Coal Corporation

331 F.2d 738 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 6, 1964

The Company challenges the allowance of interest by the Board. This Court has heretofore determined that an allowance of interest is discretionary with the Board. Philip Carey Mfg. Co. Miami Cabinet Division v. N. L. R. … -C.I.O. v. N. L. R. B., 320 F.2d 757 , 760-761, C.A.D.C. Viewing the record as a whole we conclude that the order of the Board is supported by substantial evidence. Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R.

Wonder State Manufacturing Company v. National Labor Relations Board

331 F.2d 737 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 2, 1964

To reach this conclusion the Board drew an inference from the facts. This Court has held repeatedly that reasonable inferences to be drawn from the evidence are matters for determination by the Board. N. L. R. B. v. … Co. v. N. L. R. B., 331 F.2d 720 (C.A.6). The petition to set aside a portion of the Board’s order is denied, and enforcement of the order is granted

National Labor Relations Board v. Wayne Convalescent Center, Inc.

465 F.2d 1039 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 29, 1972

We must uphold the findings of the Board if they are supported by substantial evidence in the record considered as a whole. Universal Camera Corp. v. … Terrell Machine Co. v. NLRB, supra. The Board found that none of the circumstances that would justify Wayne in refusing to bargain is present here.

The Fisk University v. National Labor Relations Board

625 F.2d 133 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 16, 1980

ORDER Before BROWN and KENNEDY, Circuit Judges, and SILER, District Judge. * This cause came on to be heard upon the record on appeal and the briefs of counsel, and upon due consideration thereof and of the factual situation … as set out in the record and the report of the case, 237 NLRB No. 183 , it appears to the court that the findings and order of the Board are supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole.

National Labor Relations Board v. Paschall Truck Lines, Inc.

469 F.2d 74 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 12, 1972

NLRB v. Dale Industries, Inc., 355 F.2d 851 (6th Cir. 1966). … Hughes & Hatcher, Inc. v. NLRB, 393 F.2d 557 (6th Cir. 1968). This is not shown in the present case. The enforcement of the Board’s order is granted except as to the finding of illegal interrogation.

National Labor Relations Board v. United Clay Mines Corporation

219 F.2d 120 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 1, 1955

B. v. Nesen, 9 Cir., 211 F.2d 559 ; N. L. R. B. v. … B. v. American Nat. Ins. Co., supra; N. L. R. B. v. Landis Tool Co., 3 Cir., 193 F.2d 279 ; N. L. R. B. v. Norfolk Shipbuilding & Drydock Corp., 4 Cir., 195 F.2d 632 . Enforcement of the Board’s order is denied.

Williams Ex Rel. Allen v. Cambridge Board of Education

370 F.3d 630 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 4, 2004

Breeding v. … Corp. v.

Wagoner Transportation Company v. National Labor Relations Board

424 F.2d 628 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 20, 1970

Petitioner, Wagoner Transportation Company, seeks to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board which the Board seeks to enforce. The order is reported at 177 N.L.R.B. No. 22. … Enforcement of the order of the Board is granted.

Hickman Garment Company v. National Labor Relations Board

471 F.2d 610 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 11, 1972

Hickman Garment Co. v. N. L. R. B., 6 Cir., 408 F.2d 379 . … It is ordered that the decision of the Board be enforced.

National Labor Relations Board v. Forest City Enterprises, Inc.

663 F.2d 34 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 10, 1981

To justify its refusal, the Company must establish that the Board abused its discretion in designating the bargaining unit, Meijer, Inc. v. … We also find that the irregularities were not so extreme as to destroy confidence in the Board’s election process. Cf. Provincial House, Inc. v.