Opinion

Spitzer Akron, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

  • 470 F.2d 1000
  • 82 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2284
  • 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 6545
Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Filed
Nov 27, 1972
Status
Published
On the bench
Phillips, Mc-Cree, Cecil
Cited by
3 cases
Authority
More cited than 61.5%

The opinion

ORDER

This case is before the court on the petition of Spitzer Akron to review and set aside an order issued by the National Labor Relations Board, and on the Board’s cross application for enforcement. The Board’s decision is reported at 195 N.L.R.B. No. 24. Reference is made to the reported decision of the

*1001

Board for a detailed recitation of the facts.

We conclude that there is substantial evidence to support the conclusion of the Board that Spitzer Akron was a successor employer and was obligated to bargain with the Union as the representative of the predecessor employer, all of whom were reemployed by Spitzer Akron. N. L. R. B. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc., 406 U.S. 272 , 92 S.Ct. 1571 , 32 L.Ed.2d 61 (1972); N. L. R. B. v. Wayne Convalescent Center, Inc., 465 F.2d 1039 (6th Cir. 1972).

We further conclude that all other parts of the decision of the Board are supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole.

It is ordered that the decision of the Board be enforced.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.