Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.31s
Patricia Stephenson Eichenseer v. Reserve Life Insurance Company
894 F.2d 1414 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 9, 1990
Vagueness It is a basic principle of due process that an enactment is void for vagueness if its prohibitions are not clearly defined. Vague laws offend several important values. … This case is different because it involves judge-made law, but it is not immune to constitutional analysis.
Cited 8 timesPublished673 F.2d 91 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 12, 1982
He had no offshore license and was not a qualified navigator. His prior experience on seagoing tugs was as a wheelman or mate, not as a captain. … The extensive repair work done on OC-250, according to expert testimony, established such a weakness.
Cited 12 timesPublishedTennessee Gas Pipeline, Also Known as Tenneco Incorporated v. Houston Casualty Insurance Company
87 F.3d 150 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Aug 5, 1996
This was clearly enough physical activity on the OCS to constitute an operation. In EP Operating Ltd. Partnership v. … M/V Sonora, 985 F.2d 808 (5th Cir.1993) (permitting removal of a maritime claim where jurisdiction is proper under the Federal Sovereign Immunities Act). .Poirrier, 648 F.2d at 1066 . . 43 U.S.C. § 1332 (1). . 43 U.S.C. §
Cited 74 timesPublishedUnited States v. Blanchard McLeod United States of America v. Dallas County
385 F.2d 734 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Oct 16, 1967
If the person is clearly guilty, the probability that the police have acted for a legitimate reason is much greater than it is if the arrest is clearly baseless. … What little force is left is dissipated by the history of official obstruction of the voting registration process so clearly established in this record.
Cited 174 timesPublishedUnited States v. Charles Bolton
908 F.3d 75 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Oct 26, 2018
Accordingly, the memorandum does not qualify as Brady material. Swenson, 894 F.3d at 683. … Thus, it did not qualify as Brady material.
Cited 36 timesPublished212 F. App'x 262 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 13, 2006
In order to determine if qualified immunity is proper, this court undertakes a two-step inquiry. First, has a violation of a clearly established constitutional right been asserted? … Second, were the defendants’ actions objectively unreasonable when measured against clearly established law? Schultea v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished309 F.2d 248 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Oct 10, 1962
If the doctrine were carried to its logical extreme, unincorporated associations would enjoy virtual immunity from suit in federal courts. … Kellogg, who had already established offices there.
Cited 68 timesPublished488 F.2d 278 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jan 14, 1974
The Plan clearly requires that a disability pension applicant “submit acceptable medical evidence of permanent physical disqualification from [his] job.” (Emphasis added). Paragraph 7-A(6). … If there is an absence of objective evidence of disability, we suggest a full report from another qualified expert, not a general practitioner, in the area of the particular illness upon which disqualification is being requested
Cited 21 timesPublishedKnapp v. United States Department of Agriculture
796 F.3d 445 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jul 31, 2015
Knapp was not the victim of unfair surprise because the regulation, promulgated through notice and comment, clearly applies the purchase exemption only to persons who do not also sell animals. … That not all violators are prosecuted does not alone establish a constitutional violation.
Cited 24 timesPublishedBugher v. Consolidated X-Ray Service Corp.
705 F.2d 1426 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 31, 1983
The statute flatly prohibits an employer from making payments to employee representatives, with certain clearly elucidated, strictly construed exceptions. 10 One of these exceptions is for qualified trust funds which conform … [T]he burden of establishing a qualifying trust fund must be met by the employee organization representative.” 512 F.2d at 1026 .
Cited 15 timesPublishedInclusive Cmtys. Project, Inc. v. Lincoln Prop. Co.
920 F.3d 890 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 9, 2019
Thus, the voluntary nature of landlord participation in the voucher program does not render it immune from liability if actionable discrimination under the FHA is established. 12 … did not clearly delineate its meaning or requirements.
Cited 375 timesPublishedUnited States v. Rufus Eafie Harrell
458 F.2d 655 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 21, 1972
As stated in Goss, supra: ‘The issue of entrapment is a question for the jury unless as a matter of law_ the defendant has established beyond a reasonable doubt that he was unlawfully entrapped.’ … At the very beginning of the instruction the jury was clearly informed that the burden of proof was on the prosecution to prove by the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that there had been no unlawful or illegal entrapment
Cited 8 timesPublished279 F. App'x 301 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 22, 2008
Leggett argues correctly, however, that qualified immunity is not a defense to claims for declaratory and injunctive relief and that the defendants are not entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity. … Notwithstanding the lack of these defenses, Leggett has not created a genuine issue of material fact regarding his entitlement to injunctive relief because the summary judgment evidence establishes that the defendants did
Cited 2 timesUnpublishedBarry L. Battelstein and Jerry E. Battelstein v. Internal Revenue Service
631 F.2d 1182 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 3, 1980
The Battelsteins simply do not qualify. 7 We note further that even were this Court of the opinion that there are, as has been suggested, equitable considerations in this case favoring the Battelsteins, it has long been established … As was cogently observed by the eminent jurist Judge Learned Hand, "a transaction otherwise within an exception of the tax law, does not lose its immunity, because it is actuated by a desire to avoid, or, if one choose, to
Cited 27 timesPublishedUnited States v. Noble C. Beasley and James H. Finley
513 F.2d 309 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 23, 1975
These declarations must be carefully and clearly limited by the court at the time of their admission and the jury instructed as to such declarations and the limitations put upon them. … Mann has been followed, distinguished, explained and qualified. In view of the posture of the case at this point, we deem it unnecessary to further analyze that case or .the decisions directed to it.
Cited 16 timesPublishedRamiro Tula Rubio v. Loretta Lynch
787 F.3d 288 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 21, 2015
The use of the term “any,” without qualifying language such as lawful or legal to modify the word “status,” requires us to broadly define the phrase to include aliens admitted in an unlawful status. … Indeed, this structure very clearly indicates that Congress intended to establish two distinct duration requirements—one that demands a period following admission in any status and one that demands a period of residency after
Cited 18 timesPublishedJoel Bach v. Texas State University
614 F. App'x 789 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Sep 1, 2015
Because the party asserting that the federal courts have jurisdiction has the burden of establishing it, Bach must show that Texas waived its immunity. St. Tammany Parish, ex rel. Davis v. … “A statute’s legislative history cannot supply a waiver that does not appear clearly in any statutory text.” Lane v. Pena, 518 U.S. 187, 192 (1996); see also F.A.A. v. Cooper, 132 S. Ct. 1441, 1448 (2012).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedStephen Allen Lynn, P.C. Employee Profit Sharing Plan and Trust v. Stephen Allen Lynn, P.C.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jul 12, 1994
Lynn to withdraw money held as community property in his retirement account.3 The targeted retirement account, the Stephen Allen Lynn, P.C., Employee Profit Sharing Plan and Trust (the "Plan"), was established by … Lynn qualified as an alternate payee under a qualified domestic relations order ("QDRO") when on June 24, 1992, the state court issued the decree of divorce.
Cited 0 timesPublishedVernon Tatum, Jr. v. United States
465 F. App'x 313 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 7, 2012
. § 2672, the Attorney General has established regulations prescribing steps an FTCA plaintiff must take in order to present his claim. 28 C.F.R. §§ 14.1-14.11. … unclear whether Tatum intended to sue the SBA or the United States.1 The district court can determine the scope of Tatum’s intended claim on remand, and if necessary give him the opportunity to amend his complaint to more clearly
Cited 4 timesUnpublishedMoore v. Ashland Chemical Inc.
151 F.3d 269 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Sep 16, 1998
The primary locus of this obligation is Rule 702, which clearly contemplates some degree of regulation of the subjects and theories about which an expert may testify. … Jenkins was a highly qualified pulmonary specialist, but, as the Seventh Circuit observed in Rosen v.
Cited 918 timesPublished
Ask Donna