Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca5

10,000+ results

1.92s

  • Alice Hobbs v. Clarence Hawkins, Etc.

    968 F.2d 471 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Aug 13, 1992

    The First Amendment clearly guarantees the right to join a union and to advocate in favor of unionization. Thomas v. Collins, 323 U.S. 516, 532 , 65 S.Ct. 315, 323 , 89 L.Ed. 430 (1945). … Finally, the defendant State officials contend for the first time on appeal that they are immune from suit under the Eleventh Amendment. We find this claim to be without merit.

    Cited 84 timesPublished
  • Jack E. Alderman v. Sam Austin, Warden, Georgia State Prison

    695 F.2d 124 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jan 10, 1983

    We now have groups that are qualified to serve as jurors but unqualified to serve as foreperson. … These questions, as I see it, are pure questions of fact, subject to Rule 52’s clearly erroneous standard.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Exxon Corporation v. Chick Kam Choo

    817 F.2d 307 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 21, 1987

    Although the broad pronouncements of those early cases have been often hedged and qualified, see, e.g., Romero v. … Byrd, 657 *319 F.2d 615, 617-18 (4th Cir.1981) (admiralty court should not apply Virginia inter-spousal immunity doctrine; trend is away from this immunity; state law should not be applied "where its application would defeat

    Reversed on other grounds by Chick Kam Choo v. Exxon Corp., 486 U.S. 140 (1988)Cited 49 timesPublished
  • United States v. Juan Castillo-Rivera

    853 F.3d 218 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 30, 2017

    Martinez, 595 Fed.Appx. 330, 334 (5th Cir. 2014) (“[W]e have found the realistic possibility requirement met without the benefit of a specific state decision on point in circumstances where the plain language of the statute clearly … To support his conviction, the State had to prove that the defendant’s air rifle was a “firearm” and therefore qualified as a “deadly weapon.” See id.

    Cited 62 timesPublished
  • Elmer Ransome Hughes v. United States

    304 F.2d 91 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 20, 1962

    As to the second ground of Hughes’ motion, it clearly appears that Hughes entered his pleas of guilty to each count understandingly and voluntarily. … He carefully qualified his plea as to Count 3, and explained that he sold only 36 tablets instead of 72 as charged.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Joseph Hunter v. M. James

    Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 5, 2018

    Hunter’s argument that the district court erred in granting summary judgment for Officer James based on his qualified immunity is unavailing. … Hunter had the burden of rebutting James’s defense by establishing a genuine issue as to whether James’s alleged wrongful conduct violated clearly established law. See Hanks v. Rogers, 853 F.3d 738, 743 (5th Cir. 2017).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • United States v. Rose

    587 F.3d 695 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Nov 6, 2009

    established federal law); People v. … 12 No. 08-10813 convictions for aggravated robbery qualifies as a second serious violent felony.

    Cited 76 timesPublished
  • Frank J. Robinson v. Commissioners Court, Anderson County, and the Honorable N. R. Link, County Judge, Anderson County, Texas

    505 F.2d 674 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 23, 1974

    Sims, supra, and secondarily to equalize rural road mileage among precincts. 6 It is clear, however, that the mere fact that an apportionment plan may satisfy some legitimate governmental goals does not automatically immunize … To the contrary, as the Supreme Court established in Reynolds v.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Alicia Morales v. James A. Turman, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Executivedirector of the Texas Youth Council

    535 F.2d 864 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jul 21, 1976

    See Vernon’s Tex.Civ.Stat.Ann., art. 5143d (establishing the TYC and specifying those subject to its custody); Vernon’s Tex.Civ.Stat. … The minimum standards established by the District Court are not, as we read them, mere guidelines subject to further negotiation by the parties.

    Reversed on other grounds by Morales v. Turman, 430 U.S. 322 (1977)Cited 52 timesPublished
  • Mary P. Bender v. Dr. Frank S. Dingwerth

    425 F.2d 378 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 6, 1970

    is no basis for applying the ‘clearly erroneous’ rule. … Shipman, supra, must be met, not some exception to the clearly erroneous rule.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Michael Nalls v. Annette Lasalle

    568 F. App'x 303 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 16, 2014

    Breaux argued prescription, that Nalls had failed to state any cognizable federal or state claims, and that she was entitled to qualified immunity. The district court granted Breaux’s motion on August 1, 2013. … The court transcript repeatedly establishes that the court, “to be really cautious,” did not even factor his failure to show on that day in the determination of contempt.

    Cited 5 timesUnpublished
  • Megan Winfrey v. Keith Pikett

    Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 26, 2019

    “A qualified immunity defense alters the usual summary judgment burden of proof . . . … The malicious prosecution argument fails because Megan has failed to show that Johnson violated clearly established law.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Montiel Rubio v. Bondi

    Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Aug 13, 2025

    An applicant for asylum must first establish he is a “refugee.” 8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(1)(B)(i). … Ashcroft, 379 F.3d 182, 187–88 (5th Cir. 2004) (being struck on the head with a rock once did not qualify as persecution).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Nunez v. Allstate Insurance

    604 F.3d 840 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 22, 2010

    A district court abuses its discretion when its ruling is based on an erroneous view of the law or a clearly erroneous assessment of the evidence. Id. … of proof since Allstate has not introduced any evidence to do so. 7 The Nunezes’ claims for penalties pursuant to Louisiana Revised Statutes §§ 22:658 and 22:1220 must also fail because they have not established

    Cited 53 timesPublished
  • United States v. Villanueva-Diaz

    634 F.3d 844 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 1, 2011

    In June 1998, removal proceedings were instituted against Villanueva- Diaz based upon the allegation that his DWI conviction qualified as an “aggravated felony” under 8 U.S.C. §§ 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii) and 1101(a)(43)(F), that … 4 Case: 10-50176 Document: 00511397581 Page: 5 Date Filed: 03/01/2011 No. 10-50176 findings made by the district court in connection with that ruling unless clearly

    Cited 56 timesPublished
  • Fontenot Ex Rel. Fontenot v. Dual Drilling Co.

    179 F.3d 969 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jul 19, 1999

    There is no person or entity which meets this definition in this case, and there is clearly no vessel of any kind involved, much less one upon which any injury occurred. … Section 933 establishes procedures by which third-party claims are to be prosecuted in the context of a predicate LHWCA claim.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Harold FRANKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, Johnny Lee, Intervenor-Appellant, v. BOWMAN TRANSPORTATION COMPANY Et Al., Defendants-Appellees

    495 F.2d 398 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Sep 12, 1974

    Appellant Lee challenges as clearly erroneous the district court’s finding that the discharge was not racially discriminatory. … At time of trial, one Black applicant has been deemed qualified and is waiting for an opening.

    Reversed on other grounds by Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co., 424 U.S. 747 (1976)Cited 231 timesPublished
  • United States v. Calvin Smith

    804 F.3d 724 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Oct 23, 2015

    occupation, or calling, whether or not for profit; (C) making the record was a regular practice of that activity; (D) all these conditions are shown by the testimony of the custodian or another qualified … We conclude that the district court did not clearly err in imposing an enhancement for obstruction of justice.

    Cited 40 timesPublished
  • Centennial Savings Bank Fsb, Cross-Appellee v. United States of America, Cross-Appellant

    887 F.2d 595 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Nov 2, 1989

    Whether such an agreement is characterized as a extension or a waiver, Congress has clearly provided for such agreements within the Tax Code. … discharge of indebtedness was first established in United States v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Devin Tool & Supply Company, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Cameron Iron Works, Inc., Cross-Appellant

    784 F.2d 623 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 10, 1986

    The district court’s determination that Cameron “simply could not meet its production schedule requirements” and that rescheduling was necessary is clearly correct. … We categorically reject the district court’s conclusion that Cameron possessed an unqualified immunity from liability for untimely delivery.

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.