Case law

Harold A. Boire, Regional Director, Twelfth Region, National Labor Relations Board v. The Greyhound Corporation

309 F.2d 397 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Nov 21, 1962

BOIRE, Regional Director, Twelfth Region, National Labor Relations Board, Appellant, v. The GREYHOUND CORPORATION, Appellee. No. 19755. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. Nov. 21, 1962. … Greyhound Corporation v. Boire, D.C., 205 F.Supp. 686 . We find ourselves in agreement with the principles there stated and the decision there reached. The judgment of the district court is 2 Affirmed.

National Labor Relations Board v. Flowers Baking Company, Inc., and Ideal Baking Company, Inc.

418 F.2d 244 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Oct 27, 1969

PER CURIAM: This case comes to the court on the application of the Board to enforce its order of February 12, 1968 against Respondents. 169 NLRB No. 101 . … The order of the Board in all respects is amply supported by substantial evidence considered on the record as a whole. The order will be enforced. Enforced. 1 .

National Labor Relations Board v. E. L. Dell, Jr., Trading as Waycross MacHine Shop

311 F.2d 575 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jan 9, 1963

However, judgment heretofore entered discharging the order to show cause is, of course, without prejudice to the right of the National Labor Relations Board to bring further proceedings in the nature of a motion for civil

New York Party Shuttle v. NLRB

18 F.4th 753 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Nov 22, 2021

Because the Board did not consider the alter ego or Golden State issues, neither will we. See SEC v. … In Freytag v.

Ura Bernard Lemon, United States of America, Intervenor-Appellant v. Bossier Parish School Board

421 F.2d 121 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 12, 1970

We reversed in Hall v. St. Helena Parish School Board, 5 Cir., 1969, 417 F.2d 801 , and ordered the District Court to adopt a plan for the complete elimination of the dual system. … Holmes County Board of Education, 1969, 396 U.S. 19 , 90 S.Ct. 29 , 24 L.Ed.2d 19 ; United States v. Hinds County School Board, 5 Cir. 1969, 417 F.2d 852 , and Singleton v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Newspapers, Inc., Publisher of the Austin American and the Austin Statesman

515 F.2d 334 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 27, 1975

Although the Board’s union successorship doctrine has been invoked far less frequently than its employer successorship doctrine, 10 the union successorship doctrine has been upheld in a number of cases. NLRB v. … Normally a Board supervised election is the preferred route by which a union acquires the status of exclusive bargaining representative. NLRB v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Local 1423, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, AFL

238 F.2d 832 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 21, 1956

The Board’s Jurisdiction. Respondent first challenges the Board’s jurisdiction in reliance upon the Tenth Circuit’s decision in N. L. R. B. v. Shawnee Milling Co., 184 F.2d 57 , 23 A. … Radio Officers’ Union v. National Labor Relations Board, supra; N. L. R. B. v. Philadelphia Iron Works, supra; N. L. R. B. v. Daboll, 9 Cir., 216 F.2d 143, 145 ; cf. N. L. R. B. v. George D.

National Labor Relations Board v. American Compress Warehouse, Division of Frost-Whited Company, Inc.,respondent

321 F.2d 547 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Sep 23, 1963

B. v. … B. v. Georgia Rug Mill, 5 Cir., 308 F.2d 89 ; N. L. R. B. v. C. & J. Camp, Inc., 5 Cir., 216 F.2d 113 .

Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Airport Board v. Combustion Equipment Associates, Inc.

623 F.2d 1032 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Aug 13, 1980

Carter Lumber Co. v. … In Maxey v.

O. J. Fortenberry v. Maryland Casualty Company

247 F.2d 702 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Aug 13, 1957

National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin, 1937, 301 U.S. 1, 48 , 57 S.Ct. 615 , 81 L.Ed. 893 ; Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins, supra. … Brown, 5 Cir., 1956, 229 F.2d 889, 891 ; Reid v. Maryland Casualty Co., 5 Cir., 1933, 63 F.2d 10, 11 . Appellee relies on the following among other cases: Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America v.

James Jefferson McLain v. Real Estate Board of New Orleans, Inc.

614 F.2d 535 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 28, 1980

National Labor Relations Board v. Dallas General Drivers, Warehousemen and Helpers Local Union No. 745

281 F.2d 593 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Oct 13, 1960

See also Superior Derrick Corporation v. N.L.R.B., 5 Cir., 1960, 273 F.2d 891 . As to the breadth of the Board’s order, the Board’s brief is silent. … in Communication Workers, etc. v.

Jamerson v. The Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Alabama

662 F.2d 320 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Nov 23, 1981

Law Rep. 60 Charles JAMERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … The BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF the UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA, a corporation a/k/a the Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama in Birmingham, Alabama, a corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 79-3020.

Vaughan v. Lewisville Indep Sch Dist

62 F.4th 199 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 9, 2023

Motors Corp., 153 F.3d 242, 246 (5th Cir. 1998). 42 Browning v. … Corp. v.

Hodge v. Seiler

558 F.2d 284 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Aug 29, 1977

See Logan v. Richard E. Carmack & Associates, 368 F.Supp. 121 (E.D.Tenn.1973); Brown v. Ballas, 331 F.Supp. 1033 (N.D.Tex.1971). … Tatum v. Myrick, 425 F.Supp. 809 (M.D.Fla.1977); Sumlin v. Brown, 420 F.Supp. 78 (N.D.Fla.1976); Brown v. Blake & Bane, Inc., 402 F.Supp. 621 (E.D.Va.1975); Young v.

United States v. James Brown

453 F. App'x 537 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 16, 2011

Here, the district court considered Brown’s arguments for a lower sentence and made an individualized sentencing decision based on the facts of the case and in light of the § 3553(a) factors. See Gall v. … Brown’s sentence is presumed to be reasonable because it was within his guidelines range, and he has not shown sufficient reason for this court to disturb that presumption. See United States v.

Cooper v. Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission

820 F.3d 730 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 21, 2016

Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. N.Y. State Liquor Auth., 476 U.S. 573, 579 , 106 S.Ct. 2080 , 90 L.Ed.2d 552 (1986) (internal citations omitted). … After a charge has been filed, the Board has dual roles as prosecutor and adjudicator,, and private parties acquire rights in the Board’s final decisions that are enforceable even,if the Board is content to see its orders

United States v. Quincy Brown

456 F. App'x 501 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jan 5, 2012

PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Quincy Brown has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. … California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Brown has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein.

Smith v. The Conde Wifredo

77 F. 324 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 26, 1896

& Jones or Brown & Sons were coaling her. … The allegations of the libel are that appellant was engaged in the service of the ship, on board, in the work of loading the vessel; that while he was engaged in the hold of the ship, load-' ing it, the mate, captain, or

Byrne v. Butler

845 F.2d 501 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 9, 1988

FISH: Your Honor, I think without parole, it certainly means the parole board can’t let him out. MR. BROWN: Mr. Fish knows full well what that means and what the possibilities are. … Brown’s statement. I think that it’s improper for Mr. Brown to raise the element of a possibility of release when dealing with a death penalty case. MR. BROWN: I have no [sic] raised that possibility at all, Your Honor.