Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.17s
266 F.2d 335 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 20, 1959
Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. … Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Toledo, P. & W. R.
Reversed on other grounds by Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad, 363 U.S. 528 (1960)Cited 7 timesPublishedHeyn v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
550 F.2d 1282 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 31, 1977
550 F.2d 1282 Heyn v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College * ** No. 76-3488 United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit 3/31/77 1 E.D.La. … .; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409 ** Local Rule 21 case; see NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966
Cited 1 timesPublishedUnited States v. Charlie Brown
475 F. App'x 512 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jul 3, 2012
Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997). Our inquiry into the prisoner’s good faith “is limited to whether the appeal involves ‘legal points arguable on their merits (and therefore not frivolous).’” Howard v. … See United States v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedDonald Jerome Thomas v. West Baton Rouge Parish School Board
423 F.2d 1203 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 24, 1970
PER CURIAM: This case is one of those remanded to the District Court for adoption of a new desegregation plan in Hall v. St. Helena Parish School Board, 417 F.2d 801 (5th Cir. 1969). … The District Court gave the Board additional time and notified it that a plan proposed by HEW must be put into effect if the Board presented no alternative plan. The Board adhered to its original position.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSreeram v. L S U Med Ctr Sport
188 F.3d 314 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Sep 22, 1999
See, e.g., Brown v. CSC Logic, Inc., 82 F.3d 651 (5th Cir. 1995). … Krystek v. University of Southern Mississippi, 164 F.3d 251, 256 (5th Cir. 1999) (citing Brown, 82 F.3d at 655.)
Cited 1 timesPublishedThomas J. Smith, United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. St. Tammany Parish School Board
448 F.2d 414 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 1, 1971
Green v. County School Board, 391 U.S. 430 , 88 S.Ct. 1689 , 20 L.Ed.2d 716 . We conclude that under the facts of this case the order, 316 F. … The order requiring the appointment of a black assistant principal for Covington High School, having a student body one-third black, is warranted in light of our earlier decision in Singleton v.
Cited 10 timesPublished528 F.2d 645 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 15, 1976
Before BROWN, Chief Judge, THORNBERRY and AINSWORTH, Circuit Judges. JOHN R. … Brennan v.
Declined to follow in part by a later decision, 635 F.2d 544 (1980)Cited 82 timesPublishedUra Bernard Lemon, United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. Bossier Parish School Board
566 F.2d 985 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jan 11, 1978
Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, 402 U.S. 1, 26 , 91 S.Ct. 1267, 1281 , 28 L.Ed.2d 554 (1971). As we explained in Boykins v. … In Boykins v.
Cited 14 timesPublished406 F.2d 721 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 3, 1969
In the present case the owner was not only on board the vessel but was operating it. 4 . … Indeed, Judge Brown points out that where the court denies limitation the claimants should be allowed to pursue their common law remedies. Id. at 552. 9 . See Bello v.
Cited 42 timesPublishedAmerican Trucking Associations, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission
682 F.2d 487 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jul 29, 1982
Tamiami Trail Tours, Inc., 531 F.2d 224 (5th Cir. 1976); (Brown, C. J., concurring, suggesting the use of primary jurisdiction); Geisser v. … J., dissenting for failure to invoke primary jurisdiction), rev'd, 426 U.S. 407 , 96 S.Ct. 2140 , 48 L.Ed.2d 736 (1976); International Paper Co. v. Federal Power Commission, 476 F.2d 121 (5th Cir. 1973) (Brown, C.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRobert G. McCray v. A. F. Lee, Commissioner of State Board of Corrections
463 F.2d 424 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jul 28, 1972
PER CURIAM: We vacate the District Court’s order summarily dismissing the complaint and remand for further proceedings consistent with our opinion in Williams v. … See Groendyke Transportation, Inc. v. Davis, 5 Cir., 1969, 406 F.2d 1158 .
Cited 1 timesPublished473 F.2d 374 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 2, 1973
Rather, the board’s order must be upheld unless it can be shown that the board either abused its discretion or exceeded its statutory authority. 7 Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. … The company further argues that the board has not shown that a fair rerun election is unlikely. In NLRB v.
Cited 42 timesPublished520 F.2d 341 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Oct 1, 1975
Equi *342 ties, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., 5 Cir., 1975, 512 F.2d 1277 and Nardone v. Reynolds, 5 Cir., 1975, 508 F.2d 660 . See also United States v. Buras, 5 Cir., 1972, 475 F.2d 1370 (Brown, C. … Co. v. Curry, 1945, 156 Fla. 502 , 24 So.2d 316 ; Bowab v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co., La.App., 1963, 152 So.2d 66 . The Insurer claims that Lingo v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedClifford N. Steele v. The Board of Public Instruction of Leon County, Florida
421 F.2d 1382 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jan 8, 1970
Alexander v. Holmes County Board of Education, 1969, 396 U.S. 19 , 90 S.Ct. 29 , 24 L.Ed.2d 19 ; United States v. *1383 Hinds County School Board, 5 Cir. 1969, 417 F.2d 852 , and Singleton v. … In the light of Carter et al. v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedLeon B. Rushing v. Frederick T. Wilkinson, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, Georgia
272 F.2d 633 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Nov 25, 1959
Hiatt v. Brown, 1950, 339 U.S. 103, 111 , 70 S.Ct. 495, 499 , 94 L.Ed. 691 . This language used in Hiatt v. … Brown is almost identical with the language of the Court many years earlier, in Ex parte Reed, 1879, 100 U.S. 13, 23 , 25 L.Ed. 538 . In Burns v.
Questioned by Allen v. VanCantfort, 316 F. Supp. 222 (1970)Cited 24 timesPublished68 F.3d 886 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Oct 31, 1995
Chaves v. M/V Medina Star, 47 F.3d 153, 156 (5th Cir. 1995). … Adams v. United States, 615 F.2d 284, 288 (5th Cir.
Cited 77 timesPublishedLaborde v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.
88 F. App'x 811 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 8, 2004
LABORDE, Plaintiffs - Appellants v. BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION; PHILIP MORRIS INCORPORATED, doing business as Phillip Morris USA INC.; R.J. … GARZA, Circuit Judge:1 In this appeal, we review the district court's decision granting Defendants - Appellees’, Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, Philip Morris Incorporated, and R.J.
Cited 1 timesUnpublishedUnited States v. Alek Fidanian
465 F.2d 755 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 4, 1972
See Jurney v. *758 MacCracken, 294 U.S. 125 , 55 S.Ct. 375 , 79 L.Ed. 802 (1935); United States ex rel. Brown v. Lederer, 140 F.2d 136 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 322 U.S. 734 , 64 S.Ct. 1047 , 88 L.Ed. 1568 (1944). … Without it they are mere boards of arbitration, whose judgments and decrees, would be only advisory.” Gompers v. Buck’s Stove & Range Co., 221 U.S. 418, 450 , 31 S.Ct. 492, 501 , 55 L.Ed. 797 (1910). See also Yates v.
Cited 27 timesPublishedTeamsters Local Union No. 5 v. National Labor Relations Board
406 F.2d 439 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jan 7, 1969
(BNA) 2226 TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 5, affiliated with International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers, Ind., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. No. 26088. … See Teamsters Local No. 5, etc. v. N.L.R.B., 5 Cir., 1968, 405 F.2d 864 (Dec. 20) 2 The Board order and decision is reported at 170 N.L.R.B. No. 37.
Cited 0 timesPublished589 F.2d 232 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 7, 1979
See N.L.R.B. v. Schwartz Brothers, Inc., 154 U.S.App.D.C. 342 , 475 F.2d 926 (1973); Delta Drilling Co. v. N.L. R.B., 406 F.2d 109 (5th Cir. 1969). … The burden is on the petitioning party to show that an error was made, Southwestern Portland Cement Co. v.
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna