Case law

30 Fair empl.prac.cas. 120, 29 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,770 Brown v. Delta Air Lines

673 F.2d 1325 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 26, 1982

P 32,770 * Brown v. Delta Air Lines 81-2075 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Fifth Circuit 3/26/82 1 S.D.Tex. AFFIRMED * Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 5th Cir. R. 18

F. W. Woolworth Company, Petitioner-Cross v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross

530 F.2d 1245 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jul 2, 1976

This case is not controlled, as the employer claims, by Patio Foods v. N.L.R.B., 415 F.2d 1001 (CA5 1969). … In view of that finding the Order of the Board is ENFORCED.

National Labor Relations Board v. American Compress Warehouse, Division of Frost-Whited Company, Inc.

374 F.2d 573 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 10, 1967

There has been no showing of unfairness to the respondent, and the Board did not abuse its discretion. The Board’s Supplemental Order will be Enforced. 1 . NLRB v. … See e. g., NLRB v. New York Merchandise Co., 2 Cir. 1943, 134 F.2d 949 ; Wallace Corp. v. NLRB, 4 Cir. 1947, 159 F.2d 952 ; Vapor Blast Independent Shop Worker’s Association v.

Rev. J. A. Salary v. John C. Wilson, Jr., Ada Pearl Smith v. Honorable Gardner F. Goodwyn, Jr.

415 F.2d 467 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Sep 25, 1969

Good faith, or lack of an improper motive, is not a defense to the failure of jury board members to discharge the affirmative constitutional duties cast upon them. Vanleeward v. … Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443 , 73 S.Ct. 397 , 97 L.Ed. 469 (1953); Smith v. Texas, supra; Labat v. Bennett, supra; Billingsley, supra; Mitchell v. Johnson, 250 F.Supp. 117 (M.D.Ala. 1966).

Selkirk Metalbestos, North America, Eljer Manufacturing, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

116 F.3d 782 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jul 7, 1997

Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 71 S.Ct. 456, 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951); NLRB v. Cal-Maine Farms, Inc., 998 F.2d 1336, 1339 (5th Cir.1993). … NLRB v. Groendyke Transport, Inc., 493 F.2d 17 (5th Cir.1974). The Board has wide discretion in its supervision of representation elections.

Southwestern Pipe, Inc., Petitioner-Cross v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

444 F.2d 340 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 20, 1971

444 F.2d 340 SOUTHWESTERN PIPE, INC., Petitioner-Cross Respondent, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent-Cross Petitioner. UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. … L.R.B. v.

George Legnos and John Gorman, Jr. v. M/v Olga Jacob, Her Engines, Tackle, Etc., Schiffahrtsgesellschaft Jacob and Co., of the M/v Olga Jacob, Flensburger Dampfer-Compagnie, and United States of America, Appellees-Appellants v. Eller and Company, Inc.

498 F.2d 666 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Oct 22, 1974

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and TUTTLE and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges. JOHN R. … BROWN, Chief Judge: 1 Appellants Legnos and Gorman filed a complaint in rem against the M/V OLGA JACOB and in personam against the shipowner, the charterer, and the United States, as owner of the cargo seeking salvage award

Willie M. Reed, by His Father and Next Friend, Wilmer Reed v. Theodore B. Pearson, as Superintendent of Education of Washington County, Alabama

306 F.2d 690 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Aug 6, 1962

As au *692 thority for this statement, counsel for appellant cites Carson v. Board of Education of McDowell County, (4th Cir.) 227 F.2d 789 , the further continuation of this controversy in Carson v. … Neither these cases nor Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 349 U.S. 294 , 75 S.Ct. 753 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 , or Cooper v.

J. H. Hodges and Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company

310 F.2d 438 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Nov 30, 1962

BROWN, Circuit Judge. This appeal presents the problem of the enforceability of an award of the Railway Adjustment Board. The District Court never got to the intrinsic correctness of the award. … Hence, the claim was the classic one for exclusive primary jurisdiction of the Railway Adjustment Board. Pennsylvania R. R. v. Day, 1959, 360 U.S. 548 , 79 S.Ct. 1322 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1422 ; Slocum v. Delaware, L. & W. R.

North Miami v. Meredith

121 F.2d 279 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 23, 1941

State, 101 Fla. 1254 , 133 So. 90 , and was again adjudged between Brown-Crummer Investment Company and the town in Ocean Beach Heights v. … Board Public Instruction, 93 Fla. 470 , 112 So. 253 . But neither exception applies here. North Miami could issue bonds, and there is no constitutional restriction involved.

Jackson Muni Airport v. Harkins

98 F.4th 144 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 2, 2024

See, e.g., TransUnion LLC v. … See, e.g., Uzuegbunam v.

Board of County Commissioners of Dade County v. Aerolineas Peruanasa, S. A.

307 F.2d 802 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Aug 31, 1962

Some of appellees sought relief, to no avail, from the Civil Aeronautics Board and the Civil Aeronautics Authority in 1955. … De Geofroy v. Riggs, 1889, 133 U.S. 258 , 10 S.Ct. 295 , 33 L.Ed. 642 ; Asakura v. Seattle, 1924, 265 U.S. 332 , 44 S.Ct. 515 , 68 L.Ed. 1041 ; Jordan v. K.

Shirley Bivins v. Bibb County Board of Education and Orphanage for Bibb County

460 F.2d 430 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 16, 1972

The en banc decision of this Court in Singleton v. … Bivins v. Bibb County Board of Education, 5 Cir. 1970, 424 F.2d 97, 99 . The district court and the school authorities complied with our mandate. On April 20, 1971, the Supreme Court decided Swann v.

Hodge v. Seiler

558 F.2d 284 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Aug 29, 1977

See Logan v. Richard E. Carmack & Associates, 368 F.Supp. 121 (E.D.Tenn.1973); Brown v. Ballas, 331 F.Supp. 1033 (N.D.Tex.1971). … Tatum v. Myrick, 425 F.Supp. 809 (M.D.Fla.1977); Sumlin v. Brown, 420 F.Supp. 78 (N.D.Fla.1976); Brown v. Blake & Bane, Inc., 402 F.Supp. 621 (E.D.Va. 1975); Young v.

Shell Chemical Company, a Division of Shell Oil Company v. National Labor Relations Board

495 F.2d 1116 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 14, 1974

The courts of appeal have consistently viewed the Board’s actions accepted for review in this framework. 7 In Laundry Workers v. … Garner v. Teamsters Union, supra, 346 U.S. at 488 ; Algoma Plywood Co. v. Wisconsin Board, 336 U.S. 301, 313 , 69 S.Ct. 584 , 93 L.Ed. 691 (1949); Hill v. Florida ex rel.

Milteer v. Navarro County, Texas

99 F.4th 268 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 24, 2024

On November 4, 2020, Milteer met with Sumpter and Keith Raymond Brown, Deputy Director of Texoma HIDTA, to discuss the data breach. … See Grant v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Laborers' International Union Of North America, Afl-Cio

882 F.2d 949 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Sep 8, 1989

P 11,533 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … Local Union 5741 v.

National Labor Relations Board v. The Cooper Company, Inc.

179 F.2d 241 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jan 19, 1950

179 F.2d 241 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. The COOPER COMPANY, Inc., Respondent. No. 12984. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. Jan. 19, 1950. A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, David P. … N.L.R.B. v. Hill Bros. Co., 5 Cir., 161 F.2d 179 ; N.L.R.B. v. Davis, 5 Cir., 172 F.2d 225 . 2 The opinions and orders in N.L.R.B. v. Pool Mfg. Co. 1 and N.L.R.B. v.

Andrew Hawkins v. Town of Shaw, Mississippi

461 F.2d 1171 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 27, 1972

Justice Harlan observed in Ohio v. … Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954); Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 349 U.S. 294 , 75 S.Ct. 753 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 (1955). See also Ohio v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Armstrong Tire and Rubber Company, Tire Test Fleet Branch

263 F.2d 680 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 19, 1959

While, therefore, accepting the examiner’s findings for the periods for which he allowed recovery, the Board, citing N.L.R.B. v. Cashman Auto. Co., 1 Cir., 223 F.2d 832 ; N.L.R.B. v. … B. v. Pugh & Barr, 4 Cir., 207 F.2d 409 ; N. L. R. B. v. Moss Planing Mill Co., 4 Cir., 224 F.2d 702 ; N. L. R. B. v. Southern Silk Mills, Inc., 6 Cir., 242 F.2d 697 ; N. L. R. B. v.