Case law

Tco Industries, Inc., National Trailways Bus System v. Civil Aeronautics Board

432 F.2d 1355 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 1, 1971

Harold A. Dundee v. Orleans Parish Board of Supervisors of Elections

434 F.2d 135 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jan 29, 1971

Clifford N. Steele v. Board of Public Instruction of Leon County, Florida

371 F.2d 395 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jan 18, 1967

See Boson v. Rippy, 5 Cir.1960, 275 F.2d 850, 853 ; Board of Public Instruction of Duval County v. Braxton, 5 Cir.1964, 326 F.2d 616 . Cf. United States v. … United States and Linda Stout v. Jefferson County Board of Education decided De *397 cember 29, 1966.

Clark v. Calhoun County, Miss.

21 F.3d 92 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 23, 1994

CLARK and Barbara Brown, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CALHOUN COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, et al., Defendants-Appellees. May 24, 1994. … Jeffers v.

National Labor Relations Board v. The Borden Company

227 F.2d 166 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 27, 1955

In answer to objections 1 and 2, the board, citing N. L. R. B. v. Red Rock Co., 5 Cir., 187 F.2d 76 , J. A. Bentley Lumber Co. v. N. L. R. B., 5 Cir., 180 F.2d 641 , and N. L. R. B. v. Southern Pine Elec. … In answer to objection 3, the board, citing N. L. R. B. v. Taormina, 5 Cir., 207 F.2d 251 , and N. L. R. B. v. Sanson Hosiery Mills, 5 Cir., 195 F.2d 350 , points, as completely sustaining it, to the facts of record.

Herbert Pate v. Dade County School Board, Etc. v. Ethel Beckford, Movants-Appellants

588 F.2d 501 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 1, 1979

In both our original consideration of this case, Pate' v. Dade County School Board, supra, and in our more recent opinion, Pate v. … Lee v.

Edna Self Garrett v. American Airlines, Inc.

332 F.2d 939 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 5, 1964

BROWN, Circuit Judge: The question in this case is whether an .air carrier must anticipate the likelihood that the manner in which its passengers handle, or mishandle, hand baggage will cause injury to a fellow traveler. … Brown v. American Airlines, Inc., 5 Cir., 1957, 244 F.2d 128 . Indeed, a jury might well say, as the plaintiff says the agent said, “This is why I tell people not to put their bags on the floor.”

United States v. Brown

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 22, 2021

However, Brown has not identified any terms deemed unconscionable by this court. We have routinely upheld appeal waivers similar to Brown’s. See, e.g., United States v. … Brown does not allege any unconstitutional motivation for the Government’s conduct. See United States v. Aderholt, 87 F.3d 740, 743 (5th Cir. 1996).

Plaquemines Parish School Board v. Norris Insurance Consultants Inc.

281 F. App'x 338 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 9, 2008

The moment this case was removed to federal court and a motion to remand was filed, it was clear that Norris and the School Board were both residents of Louisiana. … See Florence v. Crescent Res., LLC, 484 F.3d 1293, 1297 (11th Cir .2007). Either way, the distriet court did not have jurisdiction over Norris and therefore could not adjudicate the merits of the claim against him.

National Labor Relations Board v. Warren Co., Inc

214 F.2d 481 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Aug 13, 1954

Thereafter and within ten days, it petitioned the board for a review, citing our case of N. L. R. B. v. … Co. v.

William M. Keenan, Jr. v. Larry D. Bennett, Commissioner, Alabama Board of Corrections

613 F.2d 127 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 10, 1980

Citing Holtzinger v. Estelle, 488 F.2d 517 (5th Cir. 1974), Grossnickle v. Alabama, 415 F.2d 864 (5th Cir. 1969), and Quirke v. … He claims his case is governed by Wolff v.

Jeffrey Davis Blakely v. Selective Service System, Local Board No. 143

455 F.2d 795 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 22, 1972

Oestereich v. Selective Service Board No. 11, 393 U.S. 233 , 89 S.Ct. 414 , 21 L.Ed.2d 402 (1968); Breen v. Selective Service Board, 396 U.S. 460 , 90 S.Ct. 661 , 24 L.Ed.2d 653 (1970). … Ill, supra; Zerillo v. Local Board No. 102, 440 F.2d 136 (8th Cir., 1971).

Ralph Stell v. Savannah-Chatham County Board of Education and Lawrence Roberts, Carolyn Eleanor Harris v. Linda Sue Gibson, Glynn County Board of Education v. Linda Sue Gibson

333 F.2d 55 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jul 23, 1964

in Brown v. … Brown v. Board of Education, 349 U.S., at 300, 301 , 75 S.Ct. [753], at 756 [ 99 L.Ed. 1083 ].

City of Miami Beach v. Smith

551 F.2d 1370 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 16, 1977

In News-Journal Corp. v. … But in Procacci v.

Edward Giovanni v. Bruce Lynn, Secretary, Department of Correction, State of Louisiana

48 F.3d 908 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 3, 1995

Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 539-41 , 105 S.Ct. 1487, 1492-93 , 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985). … See, e.g., Murphy v. Collins, 26 F.3d 541, 543 (5th Cir.1994); Brown v. Texas A & M University, 804 F.2d 327, 335 (5th Cir.1986); Levitt v.

Knight v. Kellogg Brown & Root Inc.

333 F. App'x 1 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 27, 2009

See United States v. … See Lavespere v.

United States v. Brown

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 25, 2021

United States v. … See United States v.

J. M. Radford Grocery Co. v. Haynie

261 F. 349 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Nov 22, 1919

Brown & Co., to avoid as preferences several payments of money made by the bankrupts to the plaintiff in error (which will he called the defendant), within four months before the filing of the petition in bankruptcy, and

Retail, Wholesale and Dept. Store Union, AFL-CIO v. Rains

266 F.2d 503 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 30, 1959

Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and BROWN and WISDOM, Circuit Judges. … , National Labor Relations Board v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Laborers' International Union of North America

748 F.2d 1001 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 17, 1984

In NLRB v. … The Board chose to resolve all doubt against the wrong-doers in this case, and we uphold that choice. V.