Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca5

10,000+ results

2.74s

  • Employing Lithographers of Greater Miami, Florida v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Amalgamated Lithographers of America and Local 78, Amalgamated Lithographers of America

    301 F.2d 20 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 29, 1962

    301 F.2d 20 EMPLOYING LITHOGRAPHERS OF GREATER MIAMI, FLORIDA, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … 10 Two members of the Board dissented as to the validity of the three clauses here under consideration on the petition to modify 11 In Brown v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Helena Laboratories Corporation, Petitioner-Cross v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross

    557 F.2d 1183 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Aug 22, 1977

    The choice between two conflicting lines of testimony and two inconsistent inferences is primarily a Board function, N. L. R. B. v. Coats & Clark, Inc., 5 Cir., 1956, 231 F.2d 567 ; N. L. R. B. v. … B. v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Tesla v. NLRB

    63 F.4th 981 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 31, 2023

    Brown & Root, Inc. v. NLRB, 333 F.3d 628, 634 (5th Cir. 2003) (quoting NLRB v. PNEU Electric, Inc., 309 F.3d 843, 850 (5th Cir. 2002)). … of U.S. v. Brown, 554 U.S. 60, 67 (2008) (quoting Linn v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Eastex, Incorporated, Petitioner-Cross v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross

    556 F.2d 1280 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Aug 5, 1977

    ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion April 7, 1977, 5 Cir., 1977, 550 F.2d 198 ) Before BROWN, Chief Judge, RIVES and GEE, Circuit Judges. … The Hudgens decision recites that its intention was to clear the confusion wrought by Lloyd Corp. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Omar Brown v. Federal Express Corporation

    Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Oct 24, 2019

    BROWN, Clerk Plaintiff-Appellant v. … On the same day, the court issued its Final Judgment, dismissing all of Brown’s claims with prejudice.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Texas Petrochemicals Corporation, Petitioner-Cross v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross

    923 F.2d 398 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 11, 1991

    NLRB v. Brown, 380 U.S. 278, 291-92 , 85 S.Ct. 980, 988-89 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839 (1965). … At the same time, a four-year delay by the Board is unreasonable, see Emhart Indus. v.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Collins v. Dallas Ldrshp Fdn

    77 F.4th 327 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Aug 9, 2023

    Edith Brown Clement, Circuit Judge: Leo Collins is a former Texas state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. … Hamilton v. Lyons, 74 F.3d 99, 102 (5th Cir. 1996).

    Cited 54 timesPublished
  • Robert J. Scarpa v. U. S. Board of Parole, Walter Dunbar, Chairman

    453 F.2d 891 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 7, 1971

    PER CURIAM: Appellant, an inmate in the United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, Georgia, brought this action for declaratory relief, alleging that he had not been afforded a fair, full, and just hearing by the United States Board … In June, 1971 appellant appeared before the parole board for a second hearing.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Tesla v. NLRB

    120 F.4th 433 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Oct 25, 2024

    What that means for our court is that the evidence from the Board “must be substantial, not speculative, nor derived from inferences upon infer- ences.” Brown & Root, Inc. v. … Brown & Root, 333 F.3d at 634; see also, e.g., Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Cotten v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia

    515 F.2d 1098 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jul 9, 1975

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Turner Tool and Joint Rebuilders Corporation

    670 F.2d 637 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 19, 1982

    We are to accept the factual findings by the ALJ and the Board if they are supported by' substantial evidence in the record considered as a whole. 29 U.S.C. § 160 (e). See Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R. … This factual finding is supported by substantial evidence in the record; however, the manner in which the ALJ and the Board treated the legal effects of this finding requires a brief comment. In TRW, Inc. v. N. L. R.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Morgan v. Brown & Williamson

    Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 12, 2001

    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-20038 Conference Calendar RAY LEE MORGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus BROWN … See Bickford v. Int’l Speedway Corp., 654 F.2d 1028, * Pursuant to 5TH CIR.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Local 2179, United Steelworkers of America v. National Labor Relations Board

    822 F.2d 559 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jul 29, 1987

    Two years after Ford Motor Co. v. … V.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Effie Arcala Hightower, Etc. v. Paul D. West, Etc.

    430 F.2d 552 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Sep 11, 1970

    Bivins v. Bibb County Board of Education, 424 F.2d at 98 . … According to the School Superintendent, Fulton County assigned pupils on the basis of dual attendance zones before Brown v. Board of Education, 1954, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 , one for each race.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Mark Stephen Shanley, by Next Friend v. Northeast Independent School District, Bexar County, Texas, Etc.

    462 F.2d 960 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 29, 1972

    Des Moines In *968 dependent Community School Dist., 1969, 393 U.S. 503 , 89 S.Ct. 733 , 21 L.Ed.2d 731 ; Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (Brown 1), 1954, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 ; Brown v. … Board of Education (Brown II), 1955, 349 U.S. 294 , 75 S.Ct. 753 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 ; Bolling v. Sharpe, 1954, 347 U.S. 497 , 74 S.Ct. 693 , 98 L.Ed. 884 ; Cooper v.

    Cited 93 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. J. H. Rutter-Rex Manufacturing Company, Inc.

    229 F.2d 816 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 10, 1956

    B. v. Collins & Aikman Corp., 4 Cir., 146 F.2d 454 . … B. v. Whitin Machine Works, 1 Cir., 204 F.2d 883 .

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Nolen v. Schlesinger

    492 F.2d 787 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 15, 1974

    for consideration,” citing Sanford v. … See especially Brown v. United States, 1968, 396 F.2d 989 , 184 Ct.Cl. 501 ; see also Sierra Club v. Hardin, D.C.Alaska, 325 F.Supp. 99, 114 (1971); Schlegel v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Custom Recovery, Division of Keystone Resources, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    597 F.2d 1041 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jul 2, 1979

    NLRB v. Florida Citrus Canners Coop., 311 F.2d 541, 544 (5th Cir. 1963). … See Federal-Mogul Corp. v. NLRB, 566 F.2d 1245 , 1249 n.2 (5th Cir. 1978).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. W. R. Grace & Co., Construction Products Division

    571 F.2d 279 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 13, 1978

    NLRB v. Katz, 369 U.S. 736 , 82 S.Ct. 1107 , 8 L.Ed.2d 230 (1962); NLRB v. Laney & Duke Storage Warehouse Co., supra. As the court said in NLRB v. J. P. … NLRB v. Katz, supra; NLRB v. Amoco Chemicals Corp., 529 F.2d 427 (5 Cir. 1976); NLRB v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • I. T. T. Semi-Conductors, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    395 F.2d 257 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 21, 1968

    B. v. … other employees and which we now find as to four employees. * * ” See also Engineers and Fabricators, Inc. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.