Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca5

10,000+ results

1.47s

  • International Rice Milling Co., Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    183 F.2d 21 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 21, 1950

    The Board attempts to draw a fine distinction between primary and secondary action. … The Board erred in its interpretation of Section 8(b) (4) (A) and (B), and for that reason its order dismissing petitioners’ ■complaint is hereby set aside, and the case is remanded to the Board for further proceedings not

    Reversed in part, on other grounds by National Labor Relations Board v. International Rice Milling Co., 341 U.S. 665 (1951)Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Travis v. Board of Regents

    Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Sep 9, 1997

    See Ray v. … .”); Mooney v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown & Root, Inc. v. N. L. R. B.

    591 F.2d 1341 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 12, 1979

    P 11,395 Brown & Root, Inc. v. N. L. R. B. * No. 78-1706 United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit 3/12/79 1 N.L.R.B. ENFORCED * Local Rule 21 case; see NLRB v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Claxton Poultry Co., Inc.

    581 F.2d 1133 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Oct 10, 1978

    NLRB v. Golden Age Beverage Co., 415 F.2d 26 (CA5, 1969). The primary determination is for the Board, subject to our review under substantial evidence standards. Id. … NLRB v. Golden Age, 415 F.2d at 33 ; NLRB v. Smith Industries, Inc., 403 F.2d 889, 894 (CA5, 1968); NLRB v. Capitan Drilling Company, 408 F.2d 676 (CA5, 1969); NLRB v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Local 991, International Longshoremen's Ass'n, AFL-CIO

    332 F.2d 66 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 20, 1964

    BROWN, Circuit Judge. … We recognize, of course, that under such circumstances our review of the Board’s award in such matters is limited in scope. NLRB v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Southwestern Pipe, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    444 F.2d 340 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 20, 1971

    L.R.B. v. … See N.L.R.B. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Florida Steel Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

    648 F.2d 233 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 15, 1981

    N.L.R.B. v. Kaiser Agr. Chem. … stance, the Board correctly notes that the proper aim of judicial sanctions for civil contempt is “full remedial relief,” McComb v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State of Mississippi Department of Corrections

    87 F. App'x 406 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 18, 2004

    Brown has not shown that the district court abused its discretion in denying leave to proceed IFP. See Flowers v. Turbine Support Div., 507 F.2d 1242, 1244 (5th Cir.1975) (standard of review); see also Alexander v. … See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir.1983); 5th Cir. R. 42.2. We caution Brown that the dismissal of this appeal as frivolous counts as a strike for the purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (g). See Adepegba v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Preston H. Haskell Company

    616 F.2d 136 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 28, 1980

    Ray McDermott & Co. v. *141 NLRB, 571 F.2d 850, 858 (5th Cir. 1978); NLRB v. Louisiana Bunkers, Inc., 409 F.2d 1295, 1299-1300 (5th Cir. 1969); NLRB v. … In like vein, we held in NLRB v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Panior v. Iberville Parish School Board

    542 F.2d 576 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Oct 18, 1976

    542 F.2d 576 Panior v. Iberville Parish School Board No. 75-2381 United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit 10/18/76 M.D.La., 536 F.2d 101

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Oklahoma Transp. Co.

    140 F.2d 509 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 8, 1944

    Co. v. Brotherhood of Ry. & S. S. … National Labor Relations Board, 5 Cir., 136 F.2d 42 . National Labor Relations Board v. Riverside, 5 Cir., 119 F.2d 302 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Tex-O-Kan Flour Mills, 5 Cir., 122 F.2d 433 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Christen v. National Transportation Safety Board

    597 F.2d 281 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 25, 1979

    597 F.2d 281 Christen v. … National Transportation Safety Board * No. 78-3500 United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit 5/25/79 1 N.T.S.B. 2 AFFIRMED *** * Summary Calendar case; Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Taylor v. Ouachita Parish School Board

    656 F.2d 701 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Aug 20, 1981

    656 F.2d 701 Taylor v. Ouachita Parish School Board 80-3549, 80-3614 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Fifth Circuit 8/20/81 W.D.La., 648 F.2d 959

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Optical Workers' Union Local 24859 v. National Labor Relations Board

    227 F.2d 687 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 13, 1955

    Indeed, when the Board in one case deviated from its unannounced policy, it was held to have acted capriciously and arbitrarily. N. L. R. B. v. Guy F. Atkinson Co., 9 Cir., 195 F.2d 141 . … the Board’s action.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. American Manufacturing Company of Texas

    351 F.2d 74 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Sep 14, 1965

    Brown-Dunkin Co., 10 Cir., 1961, 287 F.2d 17, 19 ; NLRB v. Missouri Transit Co., 8 Cir., 1957, 250 F.2d 261, 262 ; NLRB v. New Madrid Mfg. Co., 8 Cir., 1954, 215 F.2d 908 ; NLRB v. … Norma Mining Corp., 4 Cir., 1953, 206 F.2d 38, 41-42 ; NLRB v. Brown-Dunkin Co., 10 Cir., 1961, 287 F.2d 17 , 19 and see cases there cited p. 19, n. 1; Town & Country Mfg. Co, v.

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • United States v. Brown

    Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 14, 2025

    State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. … State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1, 29 (2022)). 22 Diaz, 116 F.4th at 471-72 (quoting United States v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant v. Jefferson County Board of Education, United States of America v. The Board of Education of the City of Bessemer

    417 F.2d 834 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 26, 1969

    Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County, 5 Cir., 1969, 414 F.2d 69 ; Hall v. St. Helena Parish School Board, 5 Cir., 1969, 417 F.2d 801 ; Anthony v. … In Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483, 495 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954), the question of implementing the decision was posed in terms of immediate implementation or a deliberate speed concept. Fn. 13.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Tex-Togs, Inc.

    231 F.2d 310 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 27, 1956

    In Gullett Gin Co. v. N. L. R. … Salt River Valley Water Users’ Ass’n v. N. L. R. B., 9 Cir., 206 F.2d 325 ; N. L. R. B. v. Schwartz, 5 Cir., 146 F.2d 773 , and N. L. R. B. v. Augusta Chemical Co., 5 Cir., 187 F.2d 63 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Emerson v. Mississippi State Parole Board

    86 F. App'x 784 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 17, 2004

    See Thompson v. Patteson, 985 F.2d 202, 207 (5th Cir.1993). … The Mississippi State Parole Board is not an agency under the meaning of the Administrative Procedure Act. Johnson v. Wells, 566 F.2d 1016, 1018 (5th Cir.1978); Edward H. Bohlin Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Southern Plasma Corporation

    633 F.2d 1210 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jan 8, 1981

    See 29 U.S.C.A. § 152 (3); N.L.R.B. v. Foodway of El Paso, 496 F.2d 117 (5th Cir. 1974); N.L.R.B. v. AcClang, Inc., 466 F.2d 558 (5th Cir. 1972); Bob’s Casing Crews, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 458 F.2d 1301 (5th Cir. 1972). … However, the result of the Board’s petition for enforcement remaining the same, we modify our opinion in this respect only and DENY the petition for rehearing. REHEARING DENIED.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.