Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.47s
International Rice Milling Co., Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
183 F.2d 21 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 21, 1950
The Board attempts to draw a fine distinction between primary and secondary action. … The Board erred in its interpretation of Section 8(b) (4) (A) and (B), and for that reason its order dismissing petitioners’ ■complaint is hereby set aside, and the case is remanded to the Board for further proceedings not
Reversed in part, on other grounds by National Labor Relations Board v. International Rice Milling Co., 341 U.S. 665 (1951)Cited 14 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Sep 9, 1997
See Ray v. … .”); Mooney v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown & Root, Inc. v. N. L. R. B.
591 F.2d 1341 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 12, 1979
P 11,395 Brown & Root, Inc. v. N. L. R. B. * No. 78-1706 United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit 3/12/79 1 N.L.R.B. ENFORCED * Local Rule 21 case; see NLRB v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Claxton Poultry Co., Inc.
581 F.2d 1133 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Oct 10, 1978
NLRB v. Golden Age Beverage Co., 415 F.2d 26 (CA5, 1969). The primary determination is for the Board, subject to our review under substantial evidence standards. Id. … NLRB v. Golden Age, 415 F.2d at 33 ; NLRB v. Smith Industries, Inc., 403 F.2d 889, 894 (CA5, 1968); NLRB v. Capitan Drilling Company, 408 F.2d 676 (CA5, 1969); NLRB v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Local 991, International Longshoremen's Ass'n, AFL-CIO
332 F.2d 66 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 20, 1964
BROWN, Circuit Judge. … We recognize, of course, that under such circumstances our review of the Board’s award in such matters is limited in scope. NLRB v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedSouthwestern Pipe, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
444 F.2d 340 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 20, 1971
L.R.B. v. … See N.L.R.B. v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedFlorida Steel Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
648 F.2d 233 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 15, 1981
N.L.R.B. v. Kaiser Agr. Chem. … stance, the Board correctly notes that the proper aim of judicial sanctions for civil contempt is “full remedial relief,” McComb v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBrown v. State of Mississippi Department of Corrections
87 F. App'x 406 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 18, 2004
Brown has not shown that the district court abused its discretion in denying leave to proceed IFP. See Flowers v. Turbine Support Div., 507 F.2d 1242, 1244 (5th Cir.1975) (standard of review); see also Alexander v. … See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir.1983); 5th Cir. R. 42.2. We caution Brown that the dismissal of this appeal as frivolous counts as a strike for the purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (g). See Adepegba v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Preston H. Haskell Company
616 F.2d 136 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 28, 1980
Ray McDermott & Co. v. *141 NLRB, 571 F.2d 850, 858 (5th Cir. 1978); NLRB v. Louisiana Bunkers, Inc., 409 F.2d 1295, 1299-1300 (5th Cir. 1969); NLRB v. … In like vein, we held in NLRB v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedPanior v. Iberville Parish School Board
542 F.2d 576 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Oct 18, 1976
542 F.2d 576 Panior v. Iberville Parish School Board No. 75-2381 United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit 10/18/76 M.D.La., 536 F.2d 101
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Oklahoma Transp. Co.
140 F.2d 509 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 8, 1944
Co. v. Brotherhood of Ry. & S. S. … National Labor Relations Board, 5 Cir., 136 F.2d 42 . National Labor Relations Board v. Riverside, 5 Cir., 119 F.2d 302 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Tex-O-Kan Flour Mills, 5 Cir., 122 F.2d 433 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedChristen v. National Transportation Safety Board
597 F.2d 281 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 25, 1979
597 F.2d 281 Christen v. … National Transportation Safety Board * No. 78-3500 United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit 5/25/79 1 N.T.S.B. 2 AFFIRMED *** * Summary Calendar case; Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTaylor v. Ouachita Parish School Board
656 F.2d 701 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Aug 20, 1981
656 F.2d 701 Taylor v. Ouachita Parish School Board 80-3549, 80-3614 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Fifth Circuit 8/20/81 W.D.La., 648 F.2d 959
Cited 0 timesPublishedOptical Workers' Union Local 24859 v. National Labor Relations Board
227 F.2d 687 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 13, 1955
Indeed, when the Board in one case deviated from its unannounced policy, it was held to have acted capriciously and arbitrarily. N. L. R. B. v. Guy F. Atkinson Co., 9 Cir., 195 F.2d 141 . … the Board’s action.
Cited 23 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. American Manufacturing Company of Texas
351 F.2d 74 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Sep 14, 1965
Brown-Dunkin Co., 10 Cir., 1961, 287 F.2d 17, 19 ; NLRB v. Missouri Transit Co., 8 Cir., 1957, 250 F.2d 261, 262 ; NLRB v. New Madrid Mfg. Co., 8 Cir., 1954, 215 F.2d 908 ; NLRB v. … Norma Mining Corp., 4 Cir., 1953, 206 F.2d 38, 41-42 ; NLRB v. Brown-Dunkin Co., 10 Cir., 1961, 287 F.2d 17 , 19 and see cases there cited p. 19, n. 1; Town & Country Mfg. Co, v.
Cited 39 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 14, 2025
State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. … State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1, 29 (2022)). 22 Diaz, 116 F.4th at 471-72 (quoting United States v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished417 F.2d 834 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 26, 1969
Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County, 5 Cir., 1969, 414 F.2d 69 ; Hall v. St. Helena Parish School Board, 5 Cir., 1969, 417 F.2d 801 ; Anthony v. … In Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483, 495 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954), the question of implementing the decision was posed in terms of immediate implementation or a deliberate speed concept. Fn. 13.
Cited 3 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Tex-Togs, Inc.
231 F.2d 310 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 27, 1956
In Gullett Gin Co. v. N. L. R. … Salt River Valley Water Users’ Ass’n v. N. L. R. B., 9 Cir., 206 F.2d 325 ; N. L. R. B. v. Schwartz, 5 Cir., 146 F.2d 773 , and N. L. R. B. v. Augusta Chemical Co., 5 Cir., 187 F.2d 63 .
Cited 2 timesPublishedEmerson v. Mississippi State Parole Board
86 F. App'x 784 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 17, 2004
See Thompson v. Patteson, 985 F.2d 202, 207 (5th Cir.1993). … The Mississippi State Parole Board is not an agency under the meaning of the Administrative Procedure Act. Johnson v. Wells, 566 F.2d 1016, 1018 (5th Cir.1978); Edward H. Bohlin Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Southern Plasma Corporation
633 F.2d 1210 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jan 8, 1981
See 29 U.S.C.A. § 152 (3); N.L.R.B. v. Foodway of El Paso, 496 F.2d 117 (5th Cir. 1974); N.L.R.B. v. AcClang, Inc., 466 F.2d 558 (5th Cir. 1972); Bob’s Casing Crews, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 458 F.2d 1301 (5th Cir. 1972). … However, the result of the Board’s petition for enforcement remaining the same, we modify our opinion in this respect only and DENY the petition for rehearing. REHEARING DENIED.
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna