Case law

National Labor Relations Board v. Mid State Sportswear, Inc.

412 F.2d 537 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 30, 1969

B. v. Schill Steel Prod., Inc., 5 Cir. 1965, 340 F.2d 568 . Furthermore, the Board does not stand on the small plant doctrine alone. … Where the Examiner and the Board reach different conclusions, if the Board’s findings are supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole they must be sustained. N. L. R. B. v.

Falk v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.

281 F. 690 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 20, 1922

. ' The ves'sel was claimed by said Shipping Board, and the cargo by the master of the Olockson as agent of the owners. … Rees v. United States (D. C.) 134 Fed. 146 ; Jacobson v. Panama R. Co. (C. C. A.) 266 Fed. 344, 346 . *695 We therefore conclude that the decree of the District Court should be affirmed.

Anson Graves, Etc. v. Walton County Board of Education

410 F.2d 1152 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 11, 1969

Graves v. Walton County Board of Education, M.D.Ga.1968, 300 F.Supp. 188 [C.A. #681, July 29-30, 1968, p. 195]. … Graves v. Walton County Board of Education, M.D.Ga.1968, 300 F.Supp. 188 [C.A. #681, July 29-30, 1968].

Hernandez v. Texas State Board of Dental Examiners

29 F.3d 624 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jul 8, 1994

29 F.3d 624 Hernandez v. Texas State Board of Dental Examiners NO. 93-01304 United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. July 08, 1994 1 Appeal From: N.D.Tex. 2 AFFIRMED.

National Labor Relations Board v. Braswell Motor Freight Lines

209 F.2d 622 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jan 29, 1954

and the employer, is in fact a struggle for power between an affiliated union, whose claims are supported by the Board, and an independent union, chosen by a majority of the employees under circumstances which the Board … Nevertheless, for the reasons assigned in N.L.R.B. v.

W.L. Rayborn v. Mississippi State Board of Dental Examiners

776 F.2d 530 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Nov 15, 1985

Prinzi v. Keydril Co., 738 F.2d 707 (5th Cir.1984). … Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners, 263 F.2d 661 (5th Cir.1959).

National Labor Relations Board v. Croft Metals, Inc.

771 F.2d 849 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Sep 6, 1985

PER CURIAM: Finding the decision by the National Labor Relations Board fully supported by the record, and concurring in each factual finding and legal conclusion therein, the same is ENFORCED.

D Holiday v. U. S. Board of Parole

524 F.2d 1230 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Nov 26, 1975

524 F.2d 1230 * d Holiday v. U. S. Board of Parole 75-2662 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Fifth Circuit 11/26/75 1 N.D.Ga. AFFIRMED * Summary Calendar case; Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v.

D Weldow v. Geneva County Board of Education

505 F.2d 1303 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 26, 1974

505 F.2d 1303 * d Weldow v. Geneva County Board of Education 74-3158 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Fifth Circuit 12/26/74 1 M.D.Ala. AFFIRMED * Summary Calendar case; Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v.

D Lackey v. U. S. Board of Parole

498 F.2d 910 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Aug 5, 1974

498 F.2d 910 * d Lackey v. U. S. Board of Parole 74-1452 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Fifth Circuit 8/5/74 1 N.D.Ga. AFFIRMED * Summary Calendar case; Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v.

D Chance v. U. S. Board of Parole

468 F.2d 950 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 9, 1972

468 F.2d 950 d Chance v. U. S. Board of Parole 72-1511 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Fifth Circuit May 9, 1972 1 E.D.Tex.

National Labor Relations Board v. Aero Engineering Corporation

433 F.2d 1311 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 16, 1971

National Labor Relations Board v. Allegheny Beverage Corp.

424 F.2d 1366 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 27, 1970

The § 8(a) (1), (3) and (5) violations found by the Board are amply supported by the facts considered on the record as a whole. … It not appearing from the record in this court that the matters involved are moot, that question should be addressed to the Board. Enforced.

National Labor Relations Board v. Singleton Packing Corp.

424 F.2d 548 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 30, 1970

Trade Winds Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

424 F.2d 549 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 29, 1970

National Labor Relations Board v. Riley Aeronautics Corp.

377 F.2d 557 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 6, 1967

PER CURIAM: The opposition of the Respondent to the Board’s petition for enforcement is so devoid of any possible merit that the Court, upon completion of the Board’s argument, ordered from the bench that the order be enforced

National Labor Relations Board v. Dubois Chemicals, Inc.

327 F.2d 494 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jan 24, 1964

We find no basis to upset the essential findings of the Board. The Order of the Board will be enforced.

National Labor Relations Board v. Arnall Manufacturing Company

196 F.2d 218 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 6, 1952

The motion is granted, with recognition of the fact that respondent does not resist, but claims to be in compliance with, the Board’s order. … The decree to be entered here, therefore, will provide that whatever the respondent has already done toward compliance with the order of the Board prior to entry of this Court’s decree will not be required to be redone, and

Edward C. Kelley v. The Railroad Retirement Board

180 F.2d 580 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 20, 1950

KELLEY, Petitioner, v. The RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent. No. 13045. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. March 20, 1950. Petition for Review of Decision of the Railroad Retirement Board. Robt. C.

National Labor Relations Board v. American Bottling Co.

205 F.2d 421 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 30, 1953

The petition to enforce the order of the Board should be, and the same hereby is, granted. Petition granted.