Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca5

10,000+ results

1.60s

  • National Labor Relations Board v. American Thread Company

    188 F.2d 161 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 20, 1951

    The motion is granted, with recognition of the fact that respondent does not resist, ■but claims to be in compliance with, the Board’s order. … The decree to be entered here, therefore, will provide that whatever *162 the respondent has already done toward compliance with the order of the Board prior to entry of this Court’s decree will not be required to be redone

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Glenn M. Hebert v. Air Logistics, Inc. And Brown & Root, Inc.

    720 F.2d 853 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 5, 1983

    In Ardoin v. J. … Law v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • United States v. Boisey Beverly, Delores Scott, Emanuel Brown, and Carl Sykes

    921 F.2d 559 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 13, 1991

    United States v. … United States v. Wilson, 884 F.2d 174, 177 (5th Cir.1989).

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • United States v. Brown

    Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 27, 2026

    United States v. Brown, 7 F.3d 1155, 1160-61, 1161 n.3 (5th Cir. 1993). … Brown, 727 F.3d 329, 340-41 (5th Cir. 2013). Brown has therefore failed to show clear error as to this adjustment. See United States v. Bourrage, 138 F.4th 327, 353- 54 (5th Cir. 2025).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Moore v. Itawamba County MS

    431 F.3d 257 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Nov 18, 2005

    v. … See Cox v. Larios, 124 S.Ct. 2806, 2809 (2004) (SCALIA, J., dissenting). 2 See Brown v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Houston Maritime Association, Inc.

    337 F.2d 333 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Sep 29, 1964

    337 F.2d 333 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … National Labor Relations Board, supra, n. 1 10 Local 357, International Board of Teamsters, etc. v. National Labor Relations Board, supra, n. 1; National Labor Relations Board v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Schill Steel Products, Inc.

    408 F.2d 803 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 28, 1969

    See, e. g., Wirtz v. Robinson and Stephens, Inc., 5 Cir. 1966, 368 F.2d 114 , Wirtz v. McDade, 5 Cir. 1964, 330 F.2d 610 , Wirtz v. … Retail Clerks’ International Association v. NLRB, 1967, 125 U.S.App.D.C. 389 , 373 F.2d 655 , Surprenant Mfg. v. NLRB, 6 Cir. 1965, 341 F.2d 756 , NLRB v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans v. Howard

    175 F. 555 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 7, 1909

    Howard, receiver of the New Orleans Waterworks Company, against the Sewerage and Water Board of New Orleans, substantially alleging: That complainant operated a water distribution system to which were connected some 12,000 … R. v. Marshall, 136 U. S. 395 , 10 Sup. Ct. 846, 34 L. Ed. 385 ; Marble Co. v. Ripley, 10 Wall. 339 , 19 L. Ed. 955 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Florida Steel Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

    620 F.2d 79 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 25, 1980

    The Board has broad latitude in ascertaining, from its fund of knowledge and expertise, appropriate remedial measures; and its decision must be given “special respect”, N. L. R. B. v. … Stevens & Co. v. N. L. R. B., 612 F.2d 881 (4th Cir. 1980), enf’g, 240 NLRB No. 35 (1979). Judicial review of the Board’s orders is, while limited, nevertheless not illusory. As stated in Consolidated Edison Co. v. N.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Gulf States Canners, Inc.

    585 F.2d 757 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 7, 1978

    The Board, acting without a hearing, accepted the Union’s arguments and ordered Gulf Canners to conduct contract negotiations with the Union. The Board has applied for enforcement of this order. … NLRB v. Bristol Spring Manufacturing Co., 579 F.2d 704 (2nd Cir. 1978); Plastic Masters, Inc. v. NLRB, 512 F.2d 449, 450-51 (6th Cir. 1975); Collins & Aikman Corporation v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Bilyeu Motor Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

    391 F.2d 928 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 27, 1968

    Acutely aware of our limited role in cases of this type which recognizes that in a de novo proceeding we might well have reached a conclusion contrary to that of the Board, we must enforce the Board’s order. … B. v. Certain-Teed Prods. Corp., 5 Cir., 1968, 387 F.2d 639 , but the Board’s. Enforced.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Plaquemines Parish Commission Council v. United States of America by John Mitchell, Attorney General of the United States

    416 F.2d 952 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Aug 15, 1969

    See Plaquemines Parish School Board, et al. v. United States, 5 Cir. 1969, 415 F.2d 817 [August 15, 1969]. … United States v. Swift & Co., 286 U.S. 106 , 52 S.Ct. 460 , 76 L.Ed. 999 (1932); Brown v. Board of Education, 349 U.S. 294 , 75 S.Ct. 753 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 (1955) (Brown II); Green v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Patterson Menhaden Corp.

    389 F.2d 701 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 2, 1968

    Local Lodge No. 1424, International Ass’n of Machinists v. N.L.R.B., 1960, 362 U.S. 411 , 80 S.Ct. 822 , 4 L.Ed.2d 832 ; N.L.R.B. v. Stafford Trucking, Inc., 7 Cir., 1967, en banc, 371 F.2d 244, 246-247 . … Board order imposes a continuing obligation; and the Board is entitled to have the resumption of the unfair practice barred by an enforcement decree.” N.L.R.B. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Texas Industries, Inc.

    387 F.2d 426 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 28, 1967

    GODBOLD, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board found that Texas Industries, Inc., violated § 8(a) (3) and (1) of the Act 1 by discharging employee Kenneth Hester, a truck driver, because of union activity. … Sewell * * * president of the company, and get everything to where everybody would be happy.’ ” What Hester describes as a “big line of bull,” and the Trial Examiner as a “cock- and-bull story”, the Board in its brief refers

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Shirley Gaines v. Dougherty County Board of Education

    442 F.2d 1344 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 7, 1971

    a student assignment plan that complies with the principles established in Swann v. … The district court shall require the school boards to file semi-annual reports during the school year similar to those required in United States v. Hinds County School Board, 5 Cir., 1970, 433 F.2d 611, at 618-619 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Board of Public Instruction for Polk County v. Gillespie

    81 F.2d 586 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jan 25, 1936

    Bours v. L’Engle, 40 Fla. 392 , 24 So. 539 ; Brown v. City of Lakeland, 61 Fla. 508 , 54 So. 716 ; McKinnon v. State, 70 Fla. 561 , 70 So. 557 , L.R.A.1916D, 90; Johnson v. … Lytic v. Halff, 75 Tex. 128, 132 , 12 S.W. 610 ; Harris Comity v. Stewart, 91 Tex. 143 , 41 S.W. 650 ; Brown v. City of Galveston, 97 Tex. 1 , 75 S.W. 488 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. West Texas Utilities Co.

    119 F.2d 683 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 2, 1941

    B. v. A. S. Abell Co., 4 Cir., 97 F.2d 951 ; Solvay Process Co. v. N. L. R. B., 5 Cir., 117 F.2d 83 . N. L. R. B. v. Texas Mining & Smelting Co., 5 Cir., 117 F.2d 86 ; N. L. R. B. v. … Heinz Co. v. N. L. R. B., 61 S.Ct. 320 , 85 L.Ed. —; Solvay Process Co. v. N. L. R. B., supra. N. L. R. B. v. Express Pub. Co., March 3, 1941, 61 S.Ct. 693 , 85 L.Ed. —. Republic Steel Corp. v. N. L. R.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Trailmobile Division, Pullman Incorporated v. National Labor Relations Board

    407 F.2d 1006 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 20, 1969

    The Board notes its belief that N.L.R.B. v. … N.L.R.B. v. Dan River Mills, Incorporated, 274 F.2d 381, 384 (5 Cir. 1960); National Labor Relations Board v. McGahey, 233 F.2d 406 (5 Cir. 1956); National Labor Relations Board v. Russell Mfg.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. E. B. Brooks, Jr.

    548 F.2d 615 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 14, 1977

    Brown, Federal Special Verdicts: The Doubt Eliminator, 5 Cir., 44 F.R.D. 338 (1969); Wolfe v. Virusky, 5 Cir., 1972, 470 F.2d 831, 837 (Brown, C. … Bankers Life & Casualty Co., 5 Cir., 1970, 426 F.2d 509, 512 (Brown, C. J., concurring); Horne v. Georgia So. & Fla. Ry., 5 Cir., 1970, 421 F.2d 975, 980 (Brown, C. J., concurring).

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Laster v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

    128 F.2d 4 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 17, 1942

    Comm. v. … Drilling Company v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.