Case law

National Labor Relations Board, Peitioner v. Texas Bolt Company

313 F.2d 761 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 13, 1963

'support the findings of the Examiner on 'two main fact issues which have been Raised by the evidence and exceptions pled after adverse findings by the Trial Examiner which were affirmed by the National Labor Relations Board … B. v. Union Mfg. Co., 124 F.2d 332 ; N. L. R. B. v. Aleo, 133 F.2d 419 ; N. L. R. B. v. Caroline Mills, 167 F.2d 212 .

Dennis Brewer v. Austin Independent School District

779 F.2d 260 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 30, 1985

He also argues that Assistant Principal Brown impermissibly acted as both a witness and a judge at the Campus Review Board hearing. … Mitchell v. Board of Trustees, 625 F.2d 660 , 664 n. 8 (5th Cir.1980).

Boson v. Rippy

285 F.2d 43 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Nov 30, 1960

See Brown v. Board of Education, 1955, 349 U.S. 294, 299 , 75 S.Ct. 753 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 . … Bell v. Rippy, D.C.N.D.Tex.1955, 133 F. Supp. 811 . . Brown v. Rippy, 5 Cir., 1956, 233 F.2d 796 . . Rippy v. Brown, 1956, 352 U.S. 878 , 77 S.Ct. 99 , 1 L.Ed.2d 79 . . Bell v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Reliance Steel Products Company

322 F.2d 49 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Aug 5, 1963

B. v. … Both of the cases cited by the Board, N. L. R. B. v. District 50, 355 U.S. 453 , 78 S.Ct. 386 , 2 L.Ed.2d 401 , and International Ladies’ Garment Workers’ Union v. N. L. R.

Larry Brown v. Civigenics

439 F. App'x 370 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Aug 29, 2011

Cayce Clerk LARRY W BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant v. … Richardson v.

National Labor Relations Board v. J. Weingarten, Inc.

511 F.2d 1163 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 21, 1975

BY THE COURT: The Supreme Court of the United States having reversed the judgment of this Court denying the petition for enforcement of the National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. J. … denying enforcement of the Board’s order is hereby vacated and set aside, and the petition of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order is hereby granted.

National Labor Relations Board v. Morrison Cafeteria Co.

449 F.2d 350 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Oct 28, 1971

See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966 .

Transcontinental Bus System, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

383 F.2d 466 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jul 24, 1967

The weight to be given the various factors in *484 a particular case is a matter for the Board, United States v. … 38 V.

National Labor Relations Board v. Alamo Express, Inc.

420 F.2d 1216 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 17, 1969

Rule 53(e) (2); National Labor Relations Board v. Alamo Express, Inc. and Alamo Cartage Company, 5th Cir. 1968, 395 F.2d 481 . The findings and conclusions of the Master are affirmed in all respects. … All costs, fees and expenses are assessed against the Board.

United States Rubber Company v. National Labor Relations Board

384 F.2d 660 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 6, 1968

Universal Camera Corp. v. N.L.R.B., 1951, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 ; N.L.R.B. v. Walton Mfg. … “[T]he initial choice between two equally conflicting inferences of discriminatory or non-discriminatory employer motivation for an employee discharge is primarily the province of the Board * * N.L.R.B. v.

Newspaper Production Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

503 F.2d 821 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Nov 6, 1974

The mere absence of Board certification does not, however, preclude an unfair labor practice finding. See Hess Oil & Chemical Corp. v. … See NLRB v. Rockaway News Supply Co., 345 U.S. 71 , 73 S.Ct. 519 , 97 L.Ed. 832 (1953). The Board rejected the argument as to each Union.

National Labor Relations Board v. Local Union No. 725 of the United Ass'n of Journeymen & Apprentices of the Plumbing & Pipefitting Industry

572 F.2d 550 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 5, 1978

their job opportunities. 1 Second, the Board found a violation in the threat Brown made to Reik, which sought to prevent him from filing charges with the Board. … While the union cites NLRB v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Tri-Service Drilling Company, National Labor Relations Board v. Brahaney Drilling Company

432 F.2d 1271 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Oct 6, 1970

Moreover, the decision whether to apply the Hondo formula to these companies, like other matters of voter eligibility, is within the sound discretion of the Board. See N.L.R.B. v. Bar-Brook Mfg. … This distinguishes the similar recent case of NLRB v.

Global Advantech v. Brown

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 27, 2026

See, e.g., Heller v. Namer, 666 F.2d 905, 911 (5th Cir. 1982) (addressing grants of summary judgment); Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Brown, 86 F. … Myers v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Texas Mining & Smelting Co.

117 F.2d 86 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jan 4, 1941

B. v. Waterman S. S. Corp., 309 U.S. 206 , 60 S.Ct. 493 , 84 L.Ed. 704 ; N. L. R. B. v. Cherry Cotton Mills, 5 Cir., 98 F.2d 444 . N. L. R. B. v. Remington Rand, 2 Cir., 94 F.2d 862; N. L. R. B. v. Express Pub. … International Association of Machinists v. N. L. R. B., Nov., 1940, 61 S.Ct. 83 , 85 L.Ed. —; N. L. R. B. v. Abell Co., 4 Cir., 97 F.2d 951 ; Solvay Process Co. v. N. L. R. B., supra. N. L. R. B. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Handy Hardware Wholesale, Inc.

542 F.2d 935 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Nov 18, 1976

It is too obvious to warrant further comment that the Board could reasonably deny credence to this argument in the instant situation. N.L.R.B. v. John S. Barnes, 478 F.2d 1105, 1107 (7th Cir. 1973). … N.L.R.B. v. Decatur Transfer & Storage Co., 430 F.2d 763, 764 (5th Cir. 1970); Home Town Foods, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 416 F.2d 392, 396 (5th Cir. 1969); Turner’s Express, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 456 F.2d 289, 290 (4th Cir. 1972).

National Labor Relations Board v. Bill's Institutional Commissary Corporation

418 F.2d 405 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Nov 10, 1969

Sincerely, TEAMSTER LOCAL NO. 270 /s/ Eugene Brown Business Agent” *407 Attached thereto was a wage scale agreement taken from a collective bargaining contract. The letter concluded: “P.S. This could be yours.” … It is clear that neither the Regional Director nor the Board has considered or applied the factual tests promulgated by the Board and adopted by this Court in N. L. R. B. v.

Brown & Root, Inc., Appellant-Appellee v. Gifford-Hill & Company, Inc., Appellee-Appellant

319 F.2d 65 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jul 30, 1963

MacEvoy Co. v. … Very similar to Watson Bros. v. Jones, supra, and reaching the same result, is Hornsby v. Rives, supra. While there is language in Fuselier v. Hudson, supra, and B & B System v.

D Brown v. G. A. C. Finance, Inc. Of Mississippi

518 F.2d 1405 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Aug 27, 1975

518 F.2d 1405 * d Brown v. G. A. C. Finance, Inc. of Mississippi 75-1247 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Fifth Circuit 8/27/75 1 S.D.Miss. … .; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of N

Bilyeu Motor Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

391 F.2d 928 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 27, 1968

Acutely aware of our limited role in cases of this type which recognizes that in a de novo proceeding we might well have reached a conclusion contrary to that of the Board, we must enforce the Board’s order. … B. v. Certain-Teed Prods. Corp., 5 Cir., 1968, 387 F.2d 639 , but the Board’s. Enforced.