Case law

Standard Materials, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

862 F.2d 1188 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jan 12, 1989

National Labor Relations Board, 319 U.S. 533, 539 , 63 S.Ct. 1214, 1218 , 87 L.Ed. 1568 (1942); Labor Board v. Link-Belt Co., 311 U.S. 584, 585-86 , 61 S.Ct. 358, 359-60 , 85 L.Ed. 368 (1941); I.A. of M. v. … Lewis, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 681 F.2d 1154, 1156 (9th Cir.1982).

Brown v. King

250 F. App'x 28 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Oct 4, 2007

Fulbruge III Summary Calendar Clerk PAUL ALLEN BROWN Plaintiff-Appellant v. … Berry v. CIGNA/RSI-CIGNA, 975 F.2d 1188, 1191 (5th Cir. 1992).

BOARD OF COM'RS FOR BURAS LEVEE DIST. v. Cockrell

91 F.2d 412 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jul 3, 1937

The reasons assigned constitute a lengthy opinion, reported in Board of Com’rs v. Mt. Forest Fur Farms, 178 La. 696 , 152 So. 497, 504 . … Puritan Co. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.

361 F.2d 512 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 19, 1966

B. v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., 5 Cir., 324 F.2d 502 . … See Old King Cole, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 6 Cir., 260 F.2d 580, 532 . . Hereinafter called Local 47. . See N.L.R.B. v. American Manufacturing Company of Texas, 5 Cir., 351 F.2d 74, 81 .

National Labor Relations Board v. McCullough Environmental Services, Inc.

5 F.3d 923 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Nov 2, 1993

NLRB v. Delta Gas, Inc., 840 F.2d 309, 311 (5th Cir.1988). We must consider the totality of the evidence, including “that which fairly detracts from the Board’s decision.” Universal Camera Corp. v. … While we may not reject the “Board’s choice between two fairly conflicting views [of the evidence],” Id. at 488-91 , 71 S.Ct. at 465-66 , we are “not left to the sheer acceptance of the Board’s conclusions.” NLRB v.

Gulf States Manufacturers, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

579 F.2d 1298 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Sep 15, 1978

Indeed, we stated in National Labor Relations Board v. … The Board erred in its decision on these questions. We held in NLRB v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Plastic Applicators, Inc.

369 F.2d 495 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 2, 1966

N.L.R.B. v. … Kansas Milling Co. v. N.L.R.B., also cited in the Board’s brief, supra, involved a refusal to reinstate six employees following an economic strike.

Houston Insulation Contractors Association v. National Labor Relations Board

357 F.2d 182 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 9, 1966

NLRB v. Joint Council of Teamsters No. 38, 338 F.2d 23, 28 (C.A.9, 1964), and cases cited. … See N.L.R.B. v. Denver Bldg.

Brown v. D. W. Winkelman Co., Inc

197 F.2d 695 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Oct 7, 1952

See 46 Am.Jur,, Sales, Secs. 327, 328 ; 77 O.J.S., Sales, § 330, p. 1192; Andries v. Nelson, La.App., 46 So.2d 333 . 3 . Bulkley v. Honold, 60 U.S. 390 , 15 L.Ed. 263 ; Nelson v. M. C. M. … Lumber Co. v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co., 129 La. 983 , 57 So. 309 ; Sidney Machine Tool Co. v. Blanchard, 186 La. 476 , 172 So. 532 . 4 . Galt v. Herndon, 16 La.App. 239 , 133 So. 800 ; McLachlan v.

National Labor Relations Board v. J. M. MacHinery Corporation

410 F.2d 587 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 9, 1969

Thus the Board concluded that inquiry into the thoughts and afterthoughts of the signer need not be made. Joy Silk Mills, Inc. v. N. L. R. … B. v. Peterson Brothers Co., supra, is a good and fair legal standard, i. e. the Board must establish that the signer of the card did, in effect, do what he would have done by voting in a Board election.

Lucas v. McKeithen

102 F.3d 171 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 23, 1996

.; Jesse Carroll Knight, Sr., Reverend, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. … Mary Parish School Board; West Carroll Parish School Board; all Defendants, Defendants, v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Standard Container Company

428 F.2d 793 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 15, 1970

See Boeing Co. v. Shipman, 411 F.2d 365, 374 (5th Cir.1969). Accordingly, that portion of the Board’s order requiring Standard to cease and desist with such interference should be enforced. … Under these circumstances the Board’s order to reinstate Geiger must be enforced. Cf. N. L. R. B. v. Burnup & Sims, Inc., 379 U.S. 21 , 85 S.Ct. 171 , 13 L.Ed.2d 1 (1964).

National Labor Relations Board v. Southern Wood Preserving Co.

135 F.2d 606 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 26, 1943

The Company not complying, the Board seeks enforcement of the order, while the Company contends there is no substantial evidence to justify the order. The facts found by the Board are briefly these. … This is not contrary to but in accord with tests we laid down in National Labor Relations Board v. Tex-O-Kan Mills Co., 5 Cir., 122 F.2d 433 .

National Labor Relations Board v. Kohen-Ligon-Folz, Inc.

128 F.2d 502 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 28, 1942

, International Association of Machinists, etc., v. … B. v. Hawk & Buck Co., 5 Cir., 120 F.2d 903 .

National Labor Relations Board v. Walker Construction Co.

928 F.2d 695 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 15, 1991

PER CURIAM: This is an application for enforcement of a National Labor Relations Board order. … Inc. v. NLRB, 704 F.2d 1390, 1397 (5th Cir.1983) (quoting Ladies Garment Workers v. NLRB, 463 F.2d 907 , 919 (D.C.Cir.1972)). See NLRB v.

National Labor Relations Board v. C. & J. Camp, Inc.

216 F.2d 113 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Oct 29, 1954

The board insists that each and every finding on which it relies finds full support in the record considered as a whole. … National Labor Relations Board v. Tex-O-Kan Mills, 5 Cir., 122 F.2d 433, 434 .

Gulfcoast Transit Company v. National Labor Relations Board

332 F.2d 28 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 13, 1964

-C.I.O. v. N. L. R. B., (1960) 362 U.S. 411 , 80 S.Ct. 822 , 4 L.Ed.2d 832 . … B. v. Childs Co., (2nd Cir. 1952) 195 F.2d 617 ; N. L. R. B. v. Pennwoven, Inc. (3rd Cir. 1952) 194 F.2d 521 ; and, In Re Knickerbocker Mfg. Co. (1954) 109 NLRB 1195 .

National Fabricators, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

903 F.2d 396 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 19, 1990

Discussion Given the Board’s expertise in applying the general provisions of the Act to the complexities of industrial life, our review is narrow. NLRB v. … Co. v. NLRB, 693 F.2d 1176, 1181 (5th Cir.1982); NLRB v. L.B. Priester & Son, Inc., 669 F.2d 355, 359 (5th Cir.1982).

National Labor Relations Board v. Plant City Steel Corporation

331 F.2d 511 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 10, 1964

BROWN, Circuit Judge. … B. v. Minute Maid Corp., 5 Cir., 1960, 283 F.2d 705, 710 . Likewise, the Board’s condemnation of Rule 14 1 was justified.

James David Williams v. U. S. Board of Paroles

428 F.2d 1210 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jul 24, 1970

On May 6, 1969, the parole board revoked parole and held forfeited all accumulated good time. … When a parolee has violated the terms of his release, the Board of Parole may revoke his earned good time and require him to serve the full unexpired term of his original sentence. 18 U.S.C.A. § 4207 ; Smith v.