Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca5

10,000+ results

3.73s

  • Freiler v. Tangipahoa Parish Board of Education

    201 F.3d 602 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jan 24, 2000

    See Lynch v. … As I noted in Murray v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Avondale Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    90 F.3d 955 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jul 25, 1996

    Dept. of the Air Force, Et Al. v. Rose, Et Al., 425 U.S. 352, 379 , 96 S.Ct. 1592, 1607 , 48 L.Ed.2d 11 (1976). In Halloran v. … See also, Voinche v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Mrs. Almena Willet Matthews v. Railroad Retirement Board

    472 F.2d 1176 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 1, 1973

    Patton v. Railroad Retirement Board, 5 Cir. 1963, 313 F.2d 434, 437 . … See Service v. Dulles, 1957, 354 U.S. 363 , 77 S.Ct. 1152 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1403 ; Accardi v. Shaughnessy, 1954, 347 U.S. 260 , 74 S.Ct. 499 , 98 L.Ed. 681 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • United Supermarkets, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    862 F.2d 549 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jan 3, 1989

    Standard of Review The Board’s findings of fact are conclusive if supported by substantial evidence on the record considered in its entirety. Universal Camera Corp. v. … V.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. National Beverages, Inc.

    418 F.2d 206 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Oct 23, 1969

    The second contention must also fail in that there was adequate support for the Board’s conclusion that the assertions as to possible discharge were capable of evaluation by the employees. N.L.R.B. v. … Southwestern Portland Cement Company v. N.L.R.B., 407 F.2d 131 (5 Cir., 1969). The Board’s ruling in this case was proper. Order enforced.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Shepherd Laundries Co.

    440 F.2d 856 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 15, 1971

    However, substantial evidence does not support the trial examiner’s and the Board’s finding that the Company discharged Darlene Brown because of union activity. … We deny enforcement of the Board’s order insofar as it requires reinstatement with back pay of employee Brown. Enforced in part and denied in part. 1 . The Board’s decision and order are reported at 176 N.L.B.B.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • United States v. Saint Landry Parish School Board

    601 F.2d 859 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Aug 30, 1979

    See Toney v. White, 476 F.2d 203 (5th Cir. 1973); James v. Humphreys Board of Election Commissioners, 384 F.Supp. 114 (N.D.Miss.1974); Coalition for Education v. Board of Elections, 370 F.Supp. 42 (S.D.N.Y.1974). … Accord, James v. Humphreys County Board of Election Commissioners, 384 F.Supp. 114 (N.D.Miss.1974). As we explained in Sands v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • In the Matter of R. Jess Brown

    346 F.2d 903 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 3, 1965

    On April 5, 1963, Brown appeared before Judge Mize of the Southern District of Mississippi in opposition to a motion by the Leake County School Board to dismiss the complaint in Hudson, et al. v. … Brown presented this petition to the School Board, but nothing was heard from the Board. Then it was decided to file the petition in the District Court seeking desegregation of the schools.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, Etc. v. Bethlehem Steel Corporation, and Claude Brown

    868 F.2d 759 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 31, 1989

    Brown appealed, challenging the AU’s finding that his temporary total disability had changed to a scheduled permanent partial disability, but the Board affirmed that finding, see Brown v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 19 Ben. … See Brown v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 20 Ben. Rev. Bd. Serv. (MB) 26 , 28 (1987). The Board disagreed with the Director’s argument.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Spartus Corporation

    471 F.2d 299 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jan 9, 1973

    The Board decision and order are reported at 195 NLRB No. 17 . We have the case on the Board’s petition to enforce and on the briefs of the parties, followed by oral argument. … To the extent stated, the Board order will be Enforced.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Terry Lynn Dunn v. Livingston Parish School Board

    430 F.2d 1261 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Aug 14, 1970

    Describe in detail the transportation system operated by the Livingston Parish School Board within the school district giving the following information for the 1968-69 and 1969-70 school years and projecting the information … Describe the school board’s plans for the retention and reassignment of nontenured Negro teachers and staff working in Negro schools, as well as its criteria for future hiring and its promotional policies for teachers and

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Gammage v. West Jasper School Board of Education

    179 F.3d 952 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 28, 1999

    Riel v. Electronic Data Sys. Corp., 99 F.3d 678, 681 (5th Cir. 1996)(emphasis added)(citing 42 U.S.C. § 12112(b)(5)(A)). … Taylor v. Principal Financial Group, Inc., 93 F.3d 155, 164 (5th Cir. 1996).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Albritton Engineering Corporation

    340 F.2d 281 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 23, 1965

    The Trial Examiner and the Board found for the Union. 138 NLRB No. 115 . The Company was privileged to replace strikers during the strike, in the interest of keeping its business going. N.L.R.B. v. … Section 10(b), therefore, is not necessarily an obstacle to enforcement of the Board’s order. See N.L.R.B. v. Textile Machine Works, 3 Cir. 1954, 214 F.2d 929, 932 ; N.L.R.B. v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Mooney Aircraft, Inc.

    328 F.2d 426 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 7, 1964

    The sole question on appeal is whether substantial evidence in the record, taken as a whole, supports the finding of the National Labor Relations Board that the respondent discharged a certain employee for union activity … After a careful study of the record and the briefs filed in this case, we agree that there is substantial evidence to support the Board’s finding. It is therefore ordered that the Board’s order be enforced.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Southland Paint Company, Inc.

    394 F.2d 717 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 8, 1968

    B. v. Linda Jo Shoe Co., 5 Cir.1962, 307 F.2d 355, 357 . George B. Brown. Brown had worked for the Company intermittently and in various positions since 1955, until he resigned in 1962. … The Board found that the Company’s failure to rehire Brown was caused by his having signed a Union card.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Dennis J. LEWIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BROWN & ROOT, INC., Defendant-Appellee

    722 F.2d 209 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jan 9, 1984

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Thomas v. Texas State Board of Medical Examiners

    807 F.2d 453 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jan 8, 1987

    Florida Board of Regents, 15 nor exhaustion of state judicial remedies, which the Court held unnecessary in Monroe v. … Monroe v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Randall Lee King v. National Transportation Safety Board

    766 F.2d 200 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jul 22, 1985

    Chromcraft Corp. v. EEOC, 465 F.2d 745, 747 (5th Cir.1972); accord EEOC v. Exchange Security Bank, 529 F.2d 1214, 1216 (5th Cir.1976). … In re French v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Corsicana Cotton Mills

    178 F.2d 347 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 9, 1949

    moderation and fair play, we hereby direct the respondent to at once initiate a resumption of bargaining with the union in a sincere effort to reach an agreement, union and respondent to be afforded the assistance of the Labor Board … of Labor' of Texas, acting for and on behalf of the-Union, to the counsel for respondent,, stating that the Union and the Company are apparently in agreement upon all provisions of the proposed contract except Articles V

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Hall v. West

    335 F.2d 481 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jul 9, 1964

    Begun more than eleven years ago, before Brown v. … Board of Education, 373 U.S. 683 , 83 S.Ct. 1405 , 10 L.Ed.2d 632 , put every school board on notice that the “all deliberate speed” language used by the Court in Brown v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.