Case law

Yeager Neil Kyle v. Swift & Company, a Corporation, and the Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, a Corporation

229 F.2d 887 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 7, 1956

As said in Wilkerson v. … Webb v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co., 121 W.Va. 115 , 2 S.E.2d 898 . And see Swift & Company v. Blackwell, 4 Cir., 84 F.2d 130 , a decision of this court applying the general law to a case arising in Virginia.

Pizlo v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.

884 F.2d 116 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 21, 1989

Each of the complaints named as defendants: Bethlehem, the members of the corporation’s Board of Directors, the corporation’s General Pension Board, the Pension Trust and certain individual officers of the corporation. … Stores, Inc. v.

Pun v. Holder

553 F. App'x 327 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 31, 2014

PER CURIAM: Rudra Bahadur Pun, a native and citizen of Nepal, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of his requests for asylum … We conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary *328 to the Board’s dismissal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (b)(4)(B) (2012); INS v.

United States v. David Wayne Williams

974 F.2d 480 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 27, 1992

United States v. Blackwood, 913 F.2d 139, 142 (4th Cir.1990); United States v. Cochrane, 896 F.2d 635, 637 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 929 , 110 S.Ct. 2627 , 110 L.Ed.2d 647 (1990); United States v. … Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730, 742 , 103 S.Ct. 1535, 1543 , 75 L.Ed.2d 502 (1983) (plurality opinion). The probable cause standard “does not demand showing that such a belief be correct or more likely true than false.”

Benson v. Walker

274 F. 622 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 4, 1921

Railroad Co. v. Husen, 95 U. S. 465, 470, 471 ; Mugler v. Kansas, 123 U. S. 623, 661 ; Lawton v. Steele, 152 U. S. 133, 136 ; Atkin v. Kansas, 191 U. S. 207, 223 ; Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U. S. 11, 27 . … In the re *625 cent case of Dobbins v. Los Angeles, 195 U.

United States v. Robert Kenneth Bush

450 F.2d 306 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 4, 1971

Bush urges that the local board did not make the sort of fact-finding statement as required in post induction cases. United States v. Broyles, 423 F.2d 1299 (4th Cir. 1970). … Guided by Ehlert, supra, we held in United States v.

Hamlet Ice Co. v. Fleming

127 F.2d 165 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 13, 1942

Santa Cruz Fruit Packing Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 303 U.S. 453, 463 , 58 S.Ct. 656 , 82 L.Ed. 954 ; Illinois Natural Gas Co. v. Central Illinois Pub. Serv. Co., 62 S.Ct. 384 , 86 L.Ed.-; Currin v. … Wallace, 306 U.S. 1 , 59 S.Ct. 379 , 83 L.Ed. 441 ; Mulford v. Smith, 307 U.S. 38 , 59 S.Ct. 648 , 83 L.Ed. 1092 ; National Labor Relations Board v.

Matthews ex rel. Matthews v. Davis

742 F.2d 825 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 30, 1984

of Education v. … Hendrick Hudson District Board of Education v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176 , 102 S.Ct. 3034 , 73 L.Ed.2d 690 (1982). . A stipulation of facts was also filed.

Abu-Bakar v. Holder

320 F. App'x 179 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 6, 2009

PER CURIAM: Kareem Abu-Bakar, a native and citizen of Nigeria, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reopen. … We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion as untimely. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (c)(2) (2008); Mosere v.

Mahmoudi v. Holder

461 F. App'x 322 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 10, 2012

See Lendo v. Gonzales, 493 F.3d 439, 441 (4th Cir.2007) (setting forth standard of review). … See Anim v. Mukasey, 535 F.3d 243, 256 (4th Cir.2008). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review substantially for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Mahmoudi (B.I.A. June 17, 2011).

Jerome Julius Brown, Sr. v. State of Maryland Attorney General of the State of Maryland, Jerome Julius Brown, Sr. v. Theresa A. Nolan, Judge Attorney General of the State of Maryland, Jerome Julius Brown, Sr. v. John W. Hardwicke, Chief Administrative Law Judge, Jerome Julius Brown, Sr. v. Maryland Parole Commission, Jerome Julius Brown, Sr. v. John W. Hardwicke Attorney General of the State of Maryland

91 F.3d 129 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 1, 1996

Jerome Julius BROWN, Sr., Petitioner--Appellant, v. STATE of Maryland; Attorney General of the State of Maryland, Respondents--Appellees. Jerome Julius Brown, Sr., Petitioner--Appellant, v. Theresa A. … Jerome Julius Brown, Sr., Petitioner--Appellant, v. John W. Hardwicke, Chief Administrative Law Judge, Respondent--Appellee. Jerome Julius Brown, Sr., Plaintiff--Appellant, v.

Nord-Deutscher Lloyd v. President of Insurance Co. of North America

110 F. 420 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 6, 1901

Co. v, Mississippi Val. Transp. Co. (C. … C.) 23 Fed. 89 ; Pearse v. Steamship Co. (D. C.) 24 Fed. 285 . The decree of the district court is affirmed.

Julian Ford, Jr. v. Us Parole Commission Us Probation & Parole Board, Columbia, Sc

1 F.3d 1232 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 3, 1993

Julian FORD, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. US PAROLE COMMISSION; US Probation & Parole Board, Columbia, SC, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-6376. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: July 16, 1993. … Ford v. United States Parole Commission, No. CA-91-1098 (D.S.C. Mar. 4, 1993).

M.C. ex rel. Crawford v. Amrhein

598 F. App'x 143 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 26, 2015

Anderson v. … She sued the individuals who recommended sterilization and their employers, the local county and its Board of Health and Board of Social Services. *148 Concluding that “[t]he county and the boards may be liable under § 1983

Anthony Grandison v. Warden, Maryland House of Correction and Mrs. Linda A. Corrick, Records Supervisor

580 F.2d 1231 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 25, 1978

This court in Brown v. United States, 483 F.2d 116 (4th Cir. 1973), adopted a two-step procedure to implement Tucker . This procedure was discussed in Stepheney v. … We took the opportunity in Strader to restate the requirements of Stepheney, supra, which refined the Brown test.

Alive Church of the Nazarene, Inc. v. Prince William County, Virginia

59 F.4th 92 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 31, 2023

(the “ABC Board”). … v.

United States v. Donald Winston Harper, John White, A/K/A Leroy J. Edwards, A/K/A Roy Edwards, Neil Wilson Rowe, United States of America v. James Merrill Burdine, United States of America v. David Ray Jenkins and David Ramond Govus, A/K/A Sam, A/K/A Melvin Hawkins, United States of America v. Donald Alfred Black, Gary Regan Talbert and Robert McNeill Herring, United States of America v. Richard Lewis Jackson and Michael Benjamin Forbes

617 F.2d 35 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 13, 1980

See, United States v. … See United States v. Warren, 578 F.2d at 1064-65 . (Stop and boarding on high seas.) But see, United States v.

Cai Zheng v. Eric Holder, Jr.

509 F. App'x 269 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 13, 2013

Delery, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Blair O’Connor, Assistant Director, Rachel Browning, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. … Chen Lin-Jian v.

Reap v. James

232 F.2d 507 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 13, 1956

As said by the Supreme Court in Estep v. … The question of jurisdiction of the local board is reached only if there is no basis in fact for the classification which it gave the registrant. See Goff v. United States, 4 Cir., 135 F.2d 610, 612 .'

Shami v. Holder

322 F. App'x 285 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 13, 2009

PER CURIAM: Nadeem Ur Rashid Shami, a native and citizen of Pakistan, petitions for review of *286 an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) upholding the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of his motion for a continuance … See Lendo v. Gonzales, 493 F.3d 439, 441 (4th Cir.2007) (setting forth standard of review).