Opinion

Abu-Bakar v. Holder

  • 320 F. App'x 179
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Apr 6, 2009
Status
Published
On the bench
Niemeyer, Traxler, Wilkinson
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 10.5%

The opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kareem Abu-Bakar, a native and citizen of Nigeria, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reopen. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion as untimely. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (c)(2) (2008); Mosere v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 397, 400 (4th Cir.2009) (“[I]t is impossible for us to say that the BIA abused its discretion in finding Mosere’s motion [to reopen], filed more than eleven years after the order of voluntary departure, untimely.”). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.