Case law

Josiah Henson v. The Honor Committee of U. Va., the Rector and Visitors of U. Va.

719 F.2d 69 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 5, 1983

See Board of Curators v. Horowitz, 485 U.S. 78 , 98 S.Ct. 948 , 55 L.Ed.2d 124 (1978). *73 B. … See Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565 , 95 S.Ct. 729 , 42 L.Ed.2d 725 (1975). The decision in Board of Curators v. Horowitz, supra, is instructive on this point.

Dan Kiser v. Clinchfield Coal Company Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

52 F.3d 321 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 19, 1995

Dan KISER, Petitioner, v. CLINCHFIELD COAL COMPANY; Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, Respondents. No. 95-1125. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. … Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Kiser v.

Holly Farms Corp v. NLRB

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 28, 1996

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … See Holly Farms Corp. v. NLRB, supra. Many of the Board's findings are uncontested here.

Norfolk & Western Railway Company v. Olen R. Roberson

918 F.2d 1144 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 16, 1990

Although the Board's interpretation standing alone is not entitled to special judicial deference, if the Director urges us to adopt the Board's interpretation, our analysis is governed by Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. … The Fifth Circuit recognized, in Freeman v.

Burie W. Heaton v. Clinchfield Coal Company Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

38 F.3d 1213 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 14, 1994

HEATON, Petitioner, v. CLINCHFIELD COAL COMPANY; Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, Respondents. No. 94-1650. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. … Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Heaton v.

Joe Jewell, Jr. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, Elkay Mining Company, Intervenor

37 F.3d 1494 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 11, 1994

Joe JEWELL, Jr., Petitioner, v. DIRECTOR, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, Respondent, ELKAY MINING COMPANY, Intervenor. No. 94-1211. … Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Jewell v.

24 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1168, 24 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 31,457, 28 cont.cas.fed. (Cch) 81,027 Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, and Liberty Mutual Life Assurance Company of Boston v. Everett Friedman, Chief of the Insurance Compliance Staff, Social Security Administration F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor Weldon J. Rougeau, Director, Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs James Cardwell, Commissioner, Social Security Administration

639 F.2d 164 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 9, 1981

See Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. at 306-07 , 99 S.Ct. at 1720 . … Brown, 441 U.S. at 304 n.34, 99 S.Ct. at 1719 n.34, citing Contractors Association v.

Maas v. National Casualty Co.

97 F.2d 247 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 6, 1938

That while plaintiffs were engaged in constructing said building the defendant sent to the said Board of Regents the following telegram: “University of Maryland “College Park, Maryland. … Washington Post Co. v. Chaloner, 250 U.S. 290 , 39 S.Ct. 448 , 63 L.Ed. 987 ; Baker v. Warner, 231 U.S. [588], 594, 34 S.Ct. 175 , 58 L.Ed. 384 .” See, also, Flaks v. Clark, 143 Md. 377 , 122 A. 383 ; Newbold v. J. M.

Dye v. Jewell Ridge Coal Corp.

21 F.3d 422 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 21, 1994

Harriet DYE, Widow of Elbert Dye, Petitioner, v. JEWELL RIDGE COAL CORPORATION; Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, Respondents. No. 93-1255. … Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Dye v.

Carlis Deel v. Dominion Coal Company Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

21 F.3d 422 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 15, 1994

Carlis DEEL, Petitioner, v. DOMINION COAL COMPANY; Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, Respondents. No. 93-2322. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. … Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Deel v.

Francine Green v. Fairfax County School Board, and Joanne T. Fields, Chairman, Fairfax County School Board

23 F.3d 400 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 6, 1994

Francine GREEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FAIRFAX COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Defendant-Appellee, and Joanne T. Fields, Chairman, Fairfax County School Board, Defendant. No. 93-2012. … We affirm on the opinion of the district court, Green v. Fairfax County Sch. Bd., 832 F.Supp. 1032 (E.D. Va.1993). AFFIRMED

David W. Bush v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor Clinchfield Coal Company

17 F.3d 1433 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 2, 1994

BUSH, Petitioner, v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; CLINCHFIELD COAL COMPANY, Respondents. No. 93-2170. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. … Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Bush v.

Thomas v. Duke University

512 F. App'x 312 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 28, 2013

Thomas v. Duke Univ., No. 3:11-cv-00387, 2012 WL 5985504 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 28, 2012).

Wannamaker v. Edisto Nat. Bank of Orangeburg

62 F.2d 696 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 10, 1933

These provisions, however, are designed to govern the actions of a board of directors in conducting the affairs of a solvent going concern, and not to render the board powerless to act so as to safeguard the assets when the … Zabriskie v. Cleveland, etc., R. Co., 23 How. 381 , 16 L. Ed. 488 ; Stokes v. Detrick, 75 Md. 256, 263 , 23 A. 846 ; Bensiek v. Thomas (C. C. A.) 66 F. 104 ; West Side Irrigation Co. v. U. S. (C. C.

Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. Minor

115 F. App'x 141 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 15, 2004

Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. … See Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. Minor, BRB No. 02-0850 (BRB Aug. 27, 2003).

Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. Spiers

119 F. App'x 521 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 14, 2005

Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. … See Newport News Shpbldg. and Dry Dock Co. v. Spiers, No. 03-624-BLA (BRB May 7, 2004).

Local 666, IBEW v. Stokes Electrical

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 11, 2000

See Sheet Metal Workers Local 20 v. … See, e.g., Retail Clerks Int'l Ass'n v.

Kenneth Kopp v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

877 F.2d 307 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 13, 1989

Danko v. Director, O.W.C.P., United States Dept. of Labor, 846 F.2d 366, 368 (6th Cir.1988); Hardesty v. Benefits Review Board, 783 F.2d 138, 139 (8th Cir.1986) (per curiam); Bernardo v. … We held in Eastern Associated Coal Corp. v.

United States v. Walker

696 F.2d 277 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 24, 1982

Parker was transferred to the cutter, but Ward was held on board with the boarding party, later augmented by Customs and other officials. … United States v. West, 574 F.2d 1131 (4th Cir.1978); United States v. Gamer, 574 F.2d 1141 , cert. denied 439 U.S. 936 , 99 S.Ct. 333 , 58 L.Ed.2d 333 (1978), and United States v.

United States v. Deunte L. Humphries

372 F.3d 653 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 17, 2004

United States v. Harris, 39 F.3d 1262, 1269 (4th Cir.1994). … Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 605 , 95 S.Ct. 2254 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975). 2 Unlike the police misconduct in Brown, supra, Humphries’ arrest was not effected for the purpose of obtaining evidence.