Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca4

10,000+ results

1.86s

  • Daulton v. Affeldt

    678 F.2d 487 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 17, 1982

    Healthy City Board of Educ. v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 , 97 S.Ct. 568 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977); Perry v. … Kim, supra; Williams v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Evans v. Cunningham

    335 F.2d 491 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 6, 1964

    Sims v. Smyth, 4 Cir., 282 F.2d 814 . . See Ex parte Hawk, 321 U.S. 114 , 64 S.Ct. 448 , 88 L.Ed. 572 . . Thomas v. Cunningham, 4 Cir., 335 F.2d 67 ; Thomas v. Cunningham, 4 Cir., 313 F.2d 934 ; Grundler v. … Garton v.

    Cited 41 timesPublished
  • Donna A. Granahan v. Dr. Jean Pearson

    782 F.2d 30 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 8, 1985

    This court in Brown v. American Broadcasting Co., 704 F.2d 1296 (4th Cir.1983) stated that, in Virginia, a statute of limitations does not accrue separately for each set of damages resulting from a wrongful act. … Brown concerned an action for damages stemming from alleged defamation and conspiracy to injure plaintiffs reputation.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Phillips v. LCI International, Inc.

    190 F.3d 609 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Sep 15, 1999

    .”); Glazer v. … See Leventhal v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Valcourt Building Services, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    142 F. App'x 668 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 24, 2005

    For example, in NLRB v. … Mead Coated Board, Inc., 337 NLRB 497, 497-98 (2002) (citations omitted); see also St. Elizabeth Cmty. Hosp. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Alvin Dotson v. Clinchfield Coal Company Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

    72 F.3d 126 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 15, 1995

    On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (95-1196-BLA) Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. … Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Dotson v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Leonard E. Drummond, Jr. v. Robert F. Froehlke, Secretary of the Army

    460 F.2d 264 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 17, 1972

    Bluth v. Laird, 435 F.2d 1065 (4 Cir. 1970); Van Bourg v. Nitze, 128 U.S.App.D.C. 301 , 388 F.2d 557 (1967). … no basis for calling a medical board.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • James Desroches, Ii, a Minor, by His Father and Next Friend, James Desroches v. Michael Caprio Roy D. Nichols, Jr. School Board of the City of Norfolk

    156 F.3d 571 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Sep 23, 1998

    Id. 117 S.Ct. at 1303 ; see, e.g., Camara v. … (quoting Delaware v. Prouse, 440 U.S. 648, 654-55 , 99 S.Ct. 1391 , 59 L.Ed.2d 660 (1979)). Recently, in Vernonia School Dist. 47J v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Chalmers v. Tulon Co of Richmond

    Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 4, 1996

    Tulon's business involves the manufacturing of drill bits and routers used in the printed circuit board industry. J.A. 42. … Brown v. Polk County , 61 F.3d 650, 654 (8th Cir. 1995) (en banc) (quoting Heller v. EBB Auto Co., 8 F.3d 1433, 1439 (9th Cir. 1993)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. Wainwright

    161 F. App'x 328 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 18, 2006

    Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the Board. … See Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. Wainwright, No. 04-0735 (B.R.B. June 16, 2005).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ollye Reynolds v. Fairfax County School Board

    985 F.2d 553 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 27, 1993

    Ollye REYNOLDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FAIRFAX COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-1066. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 (1972); Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593, 599-603 (1972). 12 Reynolds provided no such evidence before the district court.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Charles Sink v. Rogers Morton, Secretary of the Interior

    529 F.2d 601 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Sep 30, 1975

    Reed v. Franke (4th Cir. 1961) 297 F.2d 17, 27 . … Yakus v. United States (1944) 321 U.S. 414, 434-37 , 64 S.Ct. 660 , 88 L.Ed. 834 ; Smith v. Duldner (6th Cir. 1949) 175 F.2d 629, 630-1 . 10 . See Lucas v. Morton, supra ( 358 F.Supp. at 905 ) and Lance Roofing Co. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Kiser v. Clinchfield Coal Co.

    95 F. App'x 495 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 20, 2004

    Wilma Fay Kiser seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and orders affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of her survivor’s claim for black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2000) and denying … Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. See Kiser v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lusk v. Stonecoal Branch Mining, Inc.

    77 F. App'x 665 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 10, 2003

    Earnel Lusk seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2000). … Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. See Lusk v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Homer McKinley Peak

    992 F.2d 39 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 16, 1993

    United States v. Peak, No. 90-5525 (4th Cir. Nov. 15, 1990). Peak’s trial counsel, Melvyn Brown, has vanished. Neither Peak nor the government has been able to locate him since Peak’s sentencing. II. … In Rodriquez v.

    Cited 178 timesPublished
  • Gray v. Laws

    51 F.3d 426 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 10, 1995

    Prince George’s County, 827 F.2d 952, 964 (4th Cir.1987) (quoting Patsy v. Board of Regents, 457 U.S. 496 , 515 n. 19, 102 S.Ct. 2557 , 2567 n. 19, 73 L.Ed.2d 172 (1982)). … J.A. at 545 (quoting Huang v. Board of Governors of the Univ. of North Carolina, 902 F.2d 1134, 1140 (4th Cir.1990)).

    Cited 90 timesPublished
  • Horton (Ray) v. Bordenkircher (Donald E.),browning (Chauncey H.)

    722 F.2d 738 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 17, 1983

    722 F.2d 738 Horton (Ray) v. Bordenkircher (Donald E.),Browning (Chauncey H.) NO. 83-8106 United States Court of Appeals, Fourth circuit. OCT 17, 1983 1 Appeal From: N.D.W.Va. 2 CPC DENIED-DISMISSED.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Consolidated Gas Electric Light & Power Co. Of Baltimore v. Pennsylvania Water & Power Co.

    194 F.2d 89 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 3, 1952

    Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 316 U.S. 31 , 62 S.Ct. 886 , 86 L.Ed. 1246 ; U. S. Alkali Ass’n v. U. S., 325 U.S. 196 , 65 S.Ct. 1120 , 89 L.Ed. 1554 ; U. S. v. … Co. v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Alfred Lowe v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor Sewell Coal Company

    56 F.3d 61 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 25, 1995

    Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Lowe v. … DOWCP, No. 93-392-BLA (Benefits Review Board, May 13, 1994).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • James C. Fields v. Southern Ohio Coal Company Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

    37 F.3d 1493 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 6, 1994

    FIELDS, Petitioner, v. SOUTHERN OHIO COAL COMPANY; Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, Respondents. No. 93-1203. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. … Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Fields v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.