Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
5.77s
Elmer Davis, Jr. v. State of North Carolina
310 F.2d 904 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 7, 1962
The granting of a hearing is within the .discretion of the District Court, Brown v. … Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443, 506 , 73 S.Ct. 397 , 97 L.Ed. 469 . . Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443 , 73 S.Ct. 397 , 97 L.Ed. 469 . . Spano v. New York, 360 U.S. 315 , 79 S.Ct. 1202 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1265 ; Gallegos v.
Cited 18 timesPublished856 F.2d 655 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Sep 13, 1988
II. 6 In Parratt v. … Similarly, in Yates v.
Cited 1 timesPublished763 F.2d 625 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 4, 1985
As the Third Circuit reasoned in Sisco v. … Barnett v. United Airlines, Inc., 738 F.2d 358, 363-64 (10th Cir.1984); Welyczko v. U.S. Air, Inc., 733 F.2d 239, 240 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 512 , 83 L.Ed.2d 402 (1984); Sisco v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedCaldwell v. Perry & Hylton, Inc.
204 F. App'x 299 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 31, 2006
Caldwell seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2000). … Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the Board. Caldwell v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 21, 1997
Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp. , 496 U.S. 384, 398 (1990). … It certainly can- not meet the higher standard imposed by Pierce v.
Cited 0 timesPublished344 F.3d 407 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Sep 10, 2003
TREACY, Director, Department of Environmental Quality; State Water Control Board, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and United States of America, Plaintiff, v. … Cook County ("SWANCC") v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedHughes v. Clinchfield Coal Co.
223 F. App'x 239 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 5, 2007
PER CURIAM: Clara Sue Hughes seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2000). … Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the Board. Hughes v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedJacob Doe v. The University of North Carolina System
133 F.4th 305 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 4, 2025
; BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA; LEE H. … He sued UNC-CH, the UNC system, the UNC-CH Board of Trustees, the UNC Board of Governors, and eight university employees: UNC Chancellor Lee H.
Cited 8 timesPublishedSkidmore v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs
181 F. App'x 383 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 22, 2006
Skidmore seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2000). … Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. See Skidmore v.
Cited 0 timesPublished816 F.2d 162 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 21, 1987
Adams v. … See Augustus v. School Board, 507 F.2d 152, 155-56 (5th Cir.1975); Banks v. Muncie Community Schools, 433 F.2d 292, 298 (7th Cir.1970).
Cited 6 timesPublishedOllye Reynolds v. Fairfax County School Board
985 F.2d 553 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 27, 1993
Ollye REYNOLDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FAIRFAX COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-1066. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 (1972); Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593, 599-603 (1972). 12 Reynolds provided no such evidence before the district court.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished21 F.3d 421 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 11, 1994
BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, Respondent. Nos. 93-1589, 93-1755. … .' " NLRB v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSea "B" Mining Co. v. Director, Office of Worker's Compensation Programs
45 F.3d 851 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 26, 1995
The coal mine operators petition this court to review the Board’s decision. III Our review of subject matter jurisdiction is plenary. See Tazco, Inc. v. Director, OWCP, 895 F.2d 949 , 950-51 (4th Cir.1990). … Recently, the Seventh Circuit in Peabody Coal Co. v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedMorriss v. United States Department of Labor
276 F. App'x 277 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 2, 2008
PER CURIAM: Cliff Morriss seeks review of the Administrative Review Board’s decision and order dismissing his complaint of retaliatory discharge filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 7622 (2000). … Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for the reasons stated by the Board. Morriss v.
Cited 0 timesPublished105 F.3d 174 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 24, 1997
This testimony may be discounted only if one assumes either that Leavitt spontaneously put on a masterful theatrical performance to deceive Sergeant Brown or that Sergeant Brown also participated in the “coverup.” … In contrast, the dissent's extensive quotation of Sergeant Brown's testimony is beside the point.
Cited 7 timesPublished354 F.3d 262 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 29, 2003
Similarly, in Spence v. … In Car- 10 LINCOLN v. REKSTEN MANAGEMENT penter v.
Cited 1 timesPublished36 F.3d 358 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Sep 27, 1994
-Grant Co. v. … Brown, from the pool, Chandler’s counsel objected on Batson grounds. See Batson v.
Overruled by United States v. Bajakajian, 524 U.S. 321 (1998)Cited 84 timesPublishedPickens County v. National Surety Co.
13 F.2d 758 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 15, 1926
Co. v. Robinson (C. C. A. 6th) 245 F. 556 , 158 C. C. A. 22 ; Jeffrey Mfg. Co. v. Central Coal & Iron Co. (C. C.) 93 F. 408 . … Atlantic Trust Co. v. Laurinburg, supra; National Surety Co. v. Lincoln County, supra; American Bonding Co. v. U. S. to Use of Francini, supra.
Cited 24 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 22, 2023
He also requests that we review an order from the Inmate Grievance Resolution Board. Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Cheney v. U.S. Dist. … Murphy-Brown, 907 F.3d at 795 (cleaned up). This court does not have jurisdiction to grant mandamus relief against state officials. Gurley v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedTravelers Indemnity Co. v. Neal
176 F.2d 380 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 27, 1949
In Sordelett v. … To the same effect are Phoenix Indemnity Co. v. Anderson, 170 Va. 406 , 196 S.E. 629 ; Jordan v. Shelby Mut. Plate Glass etc. Co., 4 Cir., 142 F.2d 52 ; Frederiksen v. Employers’ Liability Assur.
Cited 4 timesPublished
Ask Donna