Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca4

10,000+ results

4.98s

  • Project Vote/Voting for America, Inc. v. Long

    682 F.3d 331 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 15, 2012

    Brown, Laurie A. Babinski, BAKER 4 PROJECT VOTE v. LONG HOSTETLER LLP, Washington, D.C., for the Society of Pro- fessional Journalists; Frank D. … Martha Bris- sette, an attorney and policy analyst with the Virginia State Board of Elections ("VSBE"), then emailed Advancement Project in support of Long’s refusal.

    Cited 50 timesPublished
  • Keener v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs

    372 F. App'x 399 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 29, 2010

    Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. … Keener v. DOWCP, No. 08-0261-BLA (B.R.B. Nov. 25, 2008).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • James G. Robinson v. Thomas W. Glynn, and Glynn Scientific, Incorporated Geophone Company, LLC

    349 F.3d 166 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 13, 2003

    See 17 C.F.R. § 240 .10b-5; Gasner v. Board of Supervisors of the County of Dinwiddie, 103 F.3d 361, 356 (4th Cir.1996). … Robinson not only had the power to appoint two of the board members, but he himself assumed one of the board seats and was named as the board’s vice-chairman.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Siu v. Johnson

    748 F.2d 238 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 20, 1984

    See, e.g., Skehan v. Board of Trustees of Bloomsburg State College, 590 F.2d 470 (3d Cir.1978); Mabey v. Reagan, 537 F.2d 1036 (9th Cir.1976). … See Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 481 , 92 S.Ct. 2593, 2600 , 33 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972); see also Board of Curators of the University of Missouri v.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Vance v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs

    369 F. App'x 449 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 9, 2010

    Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accord *450 ingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. … Vance v. Director, Office of Workers’ Comp. Programs, No. 08-712-BLA (B.R.B. June 23, 2009).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lurlie Ramey v. Director, Office Of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department Of Labor

    326 F.3d 474 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 14, 2003

    See Gustafson v. … Lurlie Ramey, his widow, was substituted as claimant and petitioner 3 The Board itself has consistently recognized that the BLBA does not permit settlement See Gerzarowski v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Raymond Benitez v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital

    992 F.3d 229 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 23, 2021

    Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341, 352 (1943). … The Act states that “[t]he General Assembly finds and declares that in order to protect 9 According to a white paper issued by the North Carolina School Board Association, school boards in most states

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Wake County Human Services v. William Davis

    Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 17, 2015

    OF DIRECTORS; WAKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD; KINGWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL; SHERRY SESSER; ELAINE HOFFETT; KRISTEN LEWIS; TOWN OF CARY; CARY POLICE DEPARTMENT; SETH CUNNINGHAM; PAT BAZEMORE; IRVING LESSETT; MICHELLE SAVAGE; GREGORY … CHARLOTTE MITCHELL; WENDY KIRWIN; RICHARD CROUTHIMEL; HAL MORRIS; SUSAN VICK; JANE DOE; NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; DENISE EDWARDS; ALLEN BRONIES; ANGELA HASS; DAVID DUKE; JAMIE HUNT; OLLIE TAYLOR; ROBERT BROWN

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Liverman v. Johnson

    318 F. App'x 166 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 16, 2009

    See Liverman v. Johnson, No. 3:07-cv-00344-JRS, 2008 WL 2397544 (E.D.Va. June 12, 2008).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Fleetwood v. Newport News Shipbuilding

    776 F.2d 1225 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 5, 1985

    The Board said that "change in condition" means "alteration of the physical condition of the employee caused by the accident." Rizzi v. … See Haughton Elevator Co. v. Lewis, 572 F.2d 447, 451 (4th Cir.1978) (J. Russell dissenting); see also Trans-State Dredging v. Benefits Review Board, 731 F.2d 199 (4th Cir.1984) (J. Sprouse, dissenting).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Randall v. United States

    95 F.3d 339 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Sep 10, 1996

    Kinneer, Executive Secretary, Army Board for Correction of Military Records; Deputy Chief, Appeals and Corrections Branch; Officers, Special Review Board (OSRB); Reinard M. Lotz, Colonel; Stephen Garret, Colonel; Ora J. … The Court of Federal Claims and the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit have "extensive experience reviewing decisions of corrections boards in military pay cases." Mitchell v.

    Cited 61 timesPublished
  • Clinchfield Coal Company v. DOWCP

    Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 15, 2026

    Ohio Coal Co. v. Dir. … Robinette v. Dir., OWCP, 9 B.L.R. 1- 154 (Ben. Rev. Bd. 1986); Casella v. Kaiser Steel Corp., 9 B.L.R. 1-131 (Ben. Rev.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brewster v. Westmoreland Coal Co.

    305 F. App'x 75 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 15, 2008

    Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. … Brewster v. Westmoreland Coal Co., Inc., No. 07-0835-BLA (B.R.B. June 30, 2008).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Stowers v. Westmoreland Coal Co.

    305 F. App'x 82 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 18, 2008

    Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. … Stowers v. Westmoreland Coal Co., Inc., No. 07-0678-BLA (B.R.B. Apr. 29, 2008).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Oscar A. Harrison v. Orel J. Skeen, Warden, West Virginia State Penitentiary, Moundsville, West Virginia

    226 F.2d 217 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 4, 1955

    Harrison v. Skeen, D.C., 114 F.Supp. 695, 696 . … v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Rambert L. Simmons v. Avisco, Local 713, Textile Workers Union of America

    350 F.2d 1012 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Sep 13, 1965

    McCraw v. United Ass’n of Journeymen & App. Plumbing, Etc., 341 F.2d 705, 710 (6th Cir. 1965); Vars v. … Co. v. Gulf Nat’l Bank, 307 F.2d 295 (5th Cir. 1962); Phoenix Indemnity Co. v. Givens, 263 F.2d 858 (5th Cir. 1959); Bucher v. Krause, 200 F.2d 576 (7th Cir. 1952); Trowbridge v.

    Cited 92 timesPublished
  • Folden v. Slab Fork Coal Co.

    324 F. App'x 276 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 1, 2009

    Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. … Folden v. Slab Fork Coal Co., No. 07-0836-BLA (B.R.B. June 24, 2008).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Folden v. Slab Fork Coal Co.

    324 F. App'x 276 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 1, 2009

    Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. … Folden v. Slab Fork Coal Co., No. 07-0836-BLA (B.R.B. June 24, 2008).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Davis v. North Carolina Department of Correction

    48 F.3d 134 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 2, 1995

    .”); Perdue v. … Brown, 466 U.S. 147 , 152 n. 6, 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 1726 n. 6, 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984) (per curiam).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Atlantic Coast Distributors v. Com'r of Internal Revenue

    33 F.2d 733 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 1, 1929

    This court has held that findings of primary facts made by the Board of Tax Appeals will not be reviewed when supported by testimony. Ox Fibre Brush Co. v. … The finding of the Board is that W. H.

    Cited 16 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.