Case law

B & G Building Maintenance, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

123 F. App'x 551 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 6, 2005

Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Assoc., 507 U.S. 380, 395 (1993). The most important of these factors is the untimely party’s reason for delay. Thompson v. E.I. … Hospital Del Maestro v. NLRB, 263 F.3d 173, 175 (1st Cir. 2001).

Cooper v. Hinson

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 3, 1997

COOPER, Petitioner, v. DAVID R. … __________________ 5 Cooper's additional reliance on Hinson v.

Moore of Bedford, Incorporated v. National Labor Relations Board, and Textile Workers Union of America, Afl-Cio, Clc, Intervenor

451 F.2d 406 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 15, 1971

CRAVEN, Circuit Judge: This is a petition for review by Moore of Bedford, Incorporated to set aside an *407 order of the National Labor Relations Board, and a cross-application by the Board for enforcement of its order. … This the Board was without power to do. H. K. Porter Co. v. N. L. R. B., 397 U.S. 99 , 90 S.Ct. 821 , 25 L.Ed.2d 146 (1970), Tex Tan Welhausen Co. v. N. L. R. B., 434 F.2d 405 (5th Cir. 1970).

Frederick Aikens v. William Ingram, Jr.

811 F.3d 643 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 29, 2016

See also Williams v. Wilson, 762 F.2d'357, 359 (4th Cir.1985) (adopting the Mindes test where a servicemember challenged the National Guard’s empaneling of a selective retention board). … Brown, 652 F.2d 316, 323 (3d Cir.1981)); accord Kreis v. Sec'y of the Air Force, 866 F;2d 1508, 1512 (D.C.Cir.1989).

Fides, AG v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

137 F.2d 731 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 16, 1943

This tax and the penalty were (after redetermination and adjustment) sustained by the Board of Tax Appeals (hereinafter called the Board, and now the Tax Court of the United States) and petitioner has duly appealed. … The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed. Affirmed.

Nathan Johnson v. E. H. Tucker, Warden, West Virginia Penitentiary

249 F.2d 650 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 25, 1957

Nathan Johnson v. Skeen, 140 W.Va. 896 , 87 S.E.2d 521 , certiorari denied 351 U.S. 956 , 76 S.Ct. 854 , 100 L.Ed. 1478 , where the facts are fully stated. … Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443, 465 , 73 S.Ct. 397 , 97 L.Ed. 469 .

Huff v. Board of Governors of the University of North Carolina

334 F. App'x 583 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 12, 2009

BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA – CONSTITUENT N.C. A&T STATE UNIVERSITY, Defendant - Appellee. … English v. Pabst Brewing Co., 828 F.2d 1047, 1049 (4th Cir. 1987); Morse v. Daily Press, Inc., 826 F.2d 1351, 1352-53 (4th Cir. 1987).

American Crane Corp v. NLRB

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 24, 2000

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. No. 98-2775 AMERICAN CRANE CORPORATION, Respondent. … Allentown Mack Sales & Serv., Inc. v. NLRB, 522 U.S. 359, 366-67 (1998). A. The Board adopted the ALJ's finding that American Crane had coercively interrogated Clemmons and Brown regarding their Union activities.

Coastal Lumber Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

24 F. App'x 120 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 30, 2001

Ct. at 1871; see also SEC v. … NLRB v.

Kakar v. Gonzales

209 F. App'x 247 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 14, 2006

PER CURIAM: Muhammad Salim Adnan Kakar, a native and citizen of Pakistan, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reconsider its prior order, which adopted and … We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reconsider. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (a) (2006); Jean v.

Coleman v. Cedar Coal Co.

557 F. App'x 234 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 26, 2014

Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. … Coleman v. Cedar Coal Co., No. 12-0298-BLA (B.R.B. Feb. 27, 2013; July 18, 2013).

Johnston v. Huff, Andrews & Moyler Co.

133 F. 704 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 15, 1904

By the arrangement White, as boarding boss, was to furnish board and other supplies to the employés of the Norfolk & Western Railway Company, who were engaged in making repairs to the roadbed of said company. … As to this ruling this case is cited with approval in Dillon v. Barnard, 21 Wall. 440 , 22 L. Ed. 673 ; R. R. Co. v. Meyer, 100 U. S. 457 , 25 L. Ed. 593 ; Laclede Bank v. Schuler, 120 U. S. 516 , 7 Sup. Ct. 644, 30 L.

St. Clair v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs

213 F. App'x 189 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 18, 2007

PER CURIAM: In No. 06-1485, claimant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s (“Board”) decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s (“ALJ”) denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 … Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the Board. St. Clair v.

Baltimore Sun Co v. NLRB

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 18, 2001

 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,  Petitioner, v. … Even if this question were close, the Board should have resolved it by an election. See Stevens Ford, 773 F.2d at 473; NLRB v.

Helvering v. Credit Alliance Corp.

122 F.2d 361 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 21, 1941

interpretation approved in United States v. … The argument finds *365 its basis in the rule laid down in Commissioner v.

Gnago v. Holder

317 F. App'x 359 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 16, 2009

PER CTJRIAM: Serge Gervais Gnago, a native and citizen of the Ivory Coast, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("Board") denying his motion to reconsider its prior order, which denied Gnago's … We have reviewed the record and the Board's order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reconsider. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (a) (2008); Jean v.

Gutierrez de Martinez v. Drug Enforcement Administration

111 F.3d 1148 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 24, 1997

See Brown v. Armstrong, 949 F.2d 1007, 1011-12 (8th Cir.1991) (rejecting plaintiffs claim that a jury trial was required on scope-of-employment question). … v.

United States v. Fred M. Kellerman

729 F.2d 281 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 17, 1984

Batchelor v. United States, 156 U.S. 426 , 15 S.Ct. 446 , 39 L.Ed. 478 (1895). … See United States v. DiFrancesco, 449 U.S. 117, 130 , 101 S.Ct. 426, 433 , 66 L.Ed.2d 328 (1980) (dicta); United States v. Morrison, 429 U.S. 1, 3 , 97 S.Ct. 24, 25 , 50 L.Ed.2d 1 (1976); United States v.

Sinai Hospital Of Baltimore, Inc. v. National Benefit Fund For Hospital & Health Care Employees

697 F.2d 562 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 15, 1982

(Article V, Sec. 4). … Brown, 528 F.2d 69 (9th Cir.1975); Miniard v. Lewis, 387 F.2d 864 , 865 n. 5 (D.C.Cir.1967), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 873 , 89 S.Ct. 166 , 21 L.Ed.2d 144 (1968); Talarico v.

Edwards v. City of Goldsboro

178 F.3d 231 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 14, 1999

(quoting NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Co., 458 U.S. 886, 913 , 102 S.Ct. 3409 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1215 (1982), and Carey v. Brown, 447 U.S. 455, 467 , 100 S.Ct. 2286 , 65 L.Ed.2d 263 (1980)). … Pembaur, 475 U.S. at 481 ; see also Board of County Com’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 405-06 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997)(affirming this reading of Pembaur).