Case law

Doyle v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

102 F.2d 86 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 28, 1939

The findings of fact and opinion of the Board are reported in 37 B. T. A. 323. … As was said by the court in Helvering v. Smith, 2 Cir., 90 F.2d 590 , 592: “The commuted payment merely replaced the future income with cash.” See Escher v. Commissioner, 3 Cir., 78 F.2d 815 , affirming B. T.

Roy J. Napier v. Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs

890 F.2d 669 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Sep 1, 1989

The Board correctly noted that the prohibition against the re-reading of X-rays by a Board-certified or Board-eligible radiologist is not applicable to claims filed on or after January 1, 1982. See § 718.202(a)(l)(i). … See Winfrey v. Califano, 620 F.2d 37 (4th Cir.1980). Cf. Whitman v. Califano, 617 F.2d 1055 (4th Cir.1980).

United States v. Barry Wayne Bittinger

434 F.2d 49 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 9, 1970

The recent decision in Mulloy v. … See United States v. Tichenor, 403 F.2d 986 (6 Cir. 1968); Kanas v. Yancey, 385 F.2d 506 (2 Cir., 1967). But see Robertson v. United States, 417 F.2d 440 (5 Cir. 1969).

No. 9112

330 F.2d 164 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 3, 1964

Co. v. Sales Affiliates, 164 F.2d 260 (4 Cir. 1947). In addition, the disclosures of the Brown patent resulted in a great benefit to the hosiery industry. … Keiser v.

Timberlake v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

132 F.2d 259 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 8, 1942

Helvering v. Bartlett and Commissioner v. … The decision of the Board is affirmed.

Roller v. Gunn

107 F.3d 227 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 19, 1997

Georgia State Board of Pardons and Paroles, 59 F.3d 1145 , 1149 n. 8 (11th Cir.1995) (noting that Morales called into question the validity of Akins v. … See Cavallaro v. Groose, 908 S.W.2d 138, 136 (Mo.1995) (holding that a change from a three member board to a five member board did not violate the Ex Post Facto Clause).

United States v. Whitehurst

337 F.2d 765 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 9, 1964

It appears that the Commission and the landowner’s witnesses rejected the Brown-Leeke-Baillio twenty-acre sale at $400 per acre because Brown did not know it would be used as a borrow pit. … E. g., United States v. Miller, 317 U.S. 369, 374-375 , 63 S.Ct. 276 (1943); Olson v.

Consolidation Coal Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs

575 F. App'x 184 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 16, 2014

Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. … Consolidation Coal Co. v. Dir., Office of Workers’ Comp. Programs, No. 11-0467-BLA (B.R.B. Apr. 16, 2012).

A. S. Abell Co. v. Baltimore Typographical Union No. 12

338 F.2d 190 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 4, 1964

The rules announced by the Supreme Court in United Steelworkers of America v. American Manufacturing Co., 363 U.S. 564 , 80 S.Ct. 1343 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1403 (1960), and United Steelworkers of America v. … It is the Board of Arbitration who should make the determination of whether the controversy is subject to arbtration. In support of its position the union cites Independent Soap Workers v.

Jeffra v. United States

169 F.2d 218 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 7, 1948

See Cataneo and Magliano v. United States, 4 Cir., 167 F.2d 820 . Harry I. Jeffra and Nathan E. … Because the Board believed that Jeffra was a full time employee and would so continue in the future, the Board granted him deferment.

Herman Fulton v. James Brown, Captain Lacy Thornburg

865 F.2d 1257 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 6, 1989

Herman FULTON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. James BROWN, Captain; Lacy Thornburg, Respondents-Appellees. No. 88-6749. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: Nov. 29, 1988. Decided: Jan. 6, 1989. … Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59 (1985); Strickland v.

Interstate Petroleum Corp. v. Morgan

228 F.3d 331 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Sep 8, 2000

Co. v. … Under Franchise Tax Board v.

Dorothy Burnette v. School Board of City of Virginia Beach, and E. E. Brickell, Superintendent of Schools of the City of Virginia Beach

530 F.2d 124 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 19, 1976

Chandler, by members of the Board; and she answered them. … failure to afford the right to cross-examine before the Board was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.

American Chain & Cable Co. v. Federal Trade Commission

142 F.2d 909 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 29, 1944

National Labor Relations Board v. Brad *912 ford Dyeing Ass’n, 310 U.S. 318 , 60 S.Ct. 918 , 84 L.Ed. 1226 ; Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. … National Labor Relations Board, 319 U.S. 533 , 63 S.Ct. 1214 , 87 L.Ed. 1568 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Condensor Corp. of America, 3 Cir., 128 F.2d 67 .

Kemp v. Newport News Shipbuilding And Dry Dock Company

805 F.2d 1152 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 26, 1986

Sec. 928 (a). 1 The Benefits Review Board has interpreted the statute to limit an employer's liability to fees incurred after the employer receives notice of the claim and disputes it. See Baker v. … Todd Shipyards Corp., 12 BRBS 309 (1980); Jones v.

Melton v. Orange County Democratic Party

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 2, 2004

OF ELECTIONS; DIANE BROWN, Chairman of the Orange County Board of Elections; MELVIN BEASLEY; JUNE HASS, duly appointed officials of the Orange County Board of Elections, … See Melton v. Orange County Democratic Party, No. CA-96- 517-1 (M.D.N.C. filed Feb. 11, 2004; entered Feb. 12, 2004).

McElroy Coal Co. v. Trader

578 F. App'x 233 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 11, 2014

Our review of the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. … Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. McElroy Coal Co. v. Trader, No. 12-0658-BLA (B.R.B. Sept. 24, 2013).

Consolidation Coal Co. v. Gilbert

561 F. App'x 257 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 19, 2014

Our review of the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. … Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. Consolidation Coal Co. v. Gilbert, No. 12-0427-BLA (B.R.B. May 30, 2013).

Estate of Leavitt v. Commissioner

875 F.2d 420 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 19, 1989

See Brown v. Commissioner, 706 F.2d 755, 756 (6th Cir.1983), affg. T.C. … Brown, 706 F.2d at 757 . See also Raynor v.

Nial Ruth Cox v. A. M. Stanton, M.D.

529 F.2d 47 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 6, 1975

The director of the Washington County Welfare Agency then allegedly petitioned the Eugenics Board to order Miss Cox’s sterilization. According to the complaint, this board authorized Dr. A. M. … See also Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 , 91 S.Ct. 1999 , 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971); Singleton v. Vance County Board of Education, supra, (Winter, J., concurring and dissenting); Dahl v.