Opinion

Melton v. Orange County Democratic Party

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Nov 2, 2004
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1329

SUSAN SEXTON MELTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ORANGE COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY; JAN ALLEN,

Chairman of the Orange County Democratic

Party; KEITH COOK; ALEX ZAFFRON; RICHARD

FRANCK; SHARON WORTHINGTON; S.A.M. BROOKS;

ROSCOE REEVE; RANDY BRANTLEY, current board

members of the Orange County Democratic Party;

ALL DEFENDANTS,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; DIANE BROWN,

Chairman of the Orange County Board of

Elections; MELVIN BEASLEY; JUNE HASS, duly

appointed officials of the Orange County Board

of Elections,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,

Chief District Judge. (CA-96-517-1)

Submitted: August 13, 2004 Decided: November 2, 2004

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Susan Sexton Melton, Appellant Pro Se. John Gregory McCormick,

Eric Wallace Hinson, Jeffrey E. Rosner, Chapel Hill, North

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Susan Sexton Melton appeals the district court’s order

awarding summary judgment to Appellees on her claim under the

Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213 (2000).

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Melton v. Orange County Democratic Party, No. CA-96-

517-1 (M.D.N.C. filed Feb. 11, 2004; entered Feb. 12, 2004). We

deny Melton’s motion to authorize preparation of a transcript at

government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.